Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EvoWorld.io

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:30, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

EvoWorld.io

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails GNG. No sources in article, BEFORE showed only promo. Game had a name change and I checked under the previous name and didn't find anything except promo. Draft:EvoWorld.io already exists but also lacks sources and submission was declined on 22 March 2023. CSD doesn't apply to cross name space dups.

Based on the similarity between this article now [1] and the declined draft, its obvioius this is a recreation of a declined AfC submission.

Creator has created a cross namespace redirect from the draft to mainspace. [2] // Timothy :: talk 13:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can't find any WP:RS coverage or reviews Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Websites. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources, entirely promotional. The person who loves reading (talk) 17:12, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I saw this in WP:NPP and was pondering a PROD as I broadly concur with the nom statement, however no problem if we look at the WP:AFD route instead. Coverage seems limited to promotional material only and not what is necessary to suitably assert notability. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:36, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOTPROMO applies. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:05, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete G11. Non-notable UPE spam. Uhai (talk) 05:11, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because of the lack of sources. Might be promotional, but I'm not sure. RteeeeKed 💬📖 22:07, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable, but WP:TNT applies even if good sources are found. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:33, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I did not find RS. Lightburst (talk) 01:17, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.