Jump to content

User talk:Giltsbeach

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Giltsbeach (talk | contribs) at 02:23, 5 May 2023 (May 2023: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Courtesy notification

I've started a section at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Infoboxes#Information in infobox, not in article, again: Heraldic tinctures. Yngvadottir (talk) 01:52, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Serial Number 54129

Hello, Giltsbeach. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Message added 12:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
SN54129 12:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Yngvadottir (talk) 11:15, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
This block is the result of the conversation at WP:ANI. You need to completely change your approach to editing if you want to return. Cullen328 (talk) 19:01, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Giltsbeach (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

You guys are weird af. You really think people join Wikipedia to read policies and take part in months-long discussions about infobox guidelines? You seriously think that is normal? And it "scares you" that I rather just get to editing and improving the articles I care about rather than take part in your bureaucratic hellscape? You let an editor harass and troll me for a month, no one would help when I sought intervention, and then you blocked me in the dead of night because I dared to ask for help in the first place? Yeah, I'm good. You guys really did earn your reputation. Good luck.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=You guys are weird af. You really think people join Wikipedia to read policies and take part in months-long discussions about infobox guidelines? You seriously think that is normal? And it "scares you" that I rather just get to editing and improving the articles I care about rather than take part in your bureaucratic hellscape? You let an editor harass and troll me for a month, no one would help when I sought intervention, and then you blocked me in the dead of night because I dared to ask for help in the first place? Yeah, I'm good. You guys really did earn your reputation. Good luck. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=You guys are weird af. You really think people join Wikipedia to read policies and take part in months-long discussions about infobox guidelines? You seriously think that is normal? And it "scares you" that I rather just get to editing and improving the articles I care about rather than take part in your bureaucratic hellscape? You let an editor harass and troll me for a month, no one would help when I sought intervention, and then you blocked me in the dead of night because I dared to ask for help in the first place? Yeah, I'm good. You guys really did earn your reputation. Good luck. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=You guys are weird af. You really think people join Wikipedia to read policies and take part in months-long discussions about infobox guidelines? You seriously think that is normal? And it "scares you" that I rather just get to editing and improving the articles I care about rather than take part in your bureaucratic hellscape? You let an editor harass and troll me for a month, no one would help when I sought intervention, and then you blocked me in the dead of night because I dared to ask for help in the first place? Yeah, I'm good. You guys really did earn your reputation. Good luck. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Giltsbeach (talk) 02:23, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]