User talk:Christhegeek517
A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Christhegeek517! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! —MelbourneStar☆talk 12:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
November 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Child's Play 2 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Child's Play 2 was changed by Christhegeek517 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.920798 on 2016-11-27T02:12:52+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:12, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
List of Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign endorsements
Hi there. I've undone your most recent edit to List of Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign endorsements as it added content with this citation. Scribd is not an independent reliable source (it needs to be per standard #2 of WP:ENDORSE). Unfortunately, one can't determine the veracity of Scribd seeing as it's only a place where documents are uploaded (whether they're authentic or not is a different story). If the letter provided in the Scribd document is correct, then I'd imagine a reliable source has picked it up; if that's the case, said content can be returned but only with the reliable source. Kind regards, —MelbourneStar☆talk 12:25, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Reliable Source?
I believe that Breitbart had received the letters themselves and published it on Scribd. Are they not considered reliable?
Christhegeek517 (talk) 20:16, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi Chris! how's it going! Sorry I had to undo your recent addition to Trump endorsement as the source didn't fit the guidelines as per WP:Endorsement Also breitbart is not considered a reliable source according to wikipedia blacklist. Best of luck with future edits! Alexandre8 (talk) 23:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
New section
Start a new section on the Trump 2020 page for retired Military. Thank you and happy editing! Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 22:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Nazi
Hi Chris, How's it going
It was originally added a slur as an attempt to tie Trump to Nazism. It's best left in the trash.Alexandre8 (talk) 18:35, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for September 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 United States Senate election in Utah, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ron Johnson and Roger Marshall.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Oregon gubernatorial election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Cameron.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 Republican Party presidential primaries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steven Cheung.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Your contributions at List of Donald Trump 2024 presidential campaign primary endorsements
Please review your use of named references. This article is a real mess of failed verifications right now, as you changed the content of a named reference, impacting every reference that calls to it. Please clean this up. Thanks. Wracking 💬 04:59, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- I believe this is still an issue. Please clean it up, or I will remove portions that violate Wikipedia's policies on information about living people. Let me know if you think I've made an error. Thanks. Wracking 💬 02:38, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- I'm a little confused on what you mean. Could you please highlight which reference is messed up? Thank you. Christhegeek517 (talk) 02:41, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- It's reference 62 in the current edition of the article – Kashinsky, Lisa (April 28, 2023). "The Mass. MAGA faithful". Politico. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
- As far as I can tell, the source does not apply in the dozens(!!!) of times it's called. I believe the diff I included in my initial message may be the source of the mess. Thanks. Wracking 💬 02:49, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- OK, gotcha. That source provides a hyperlink under the "BACK ON THE TRUMP TRAIN" section, which should have all the people cited on there. Is that allowed or do referenced sources have to directly list the names on the page that is being cited? Thanks. Christhegeek517 (talk) 02:58, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. While secondary sources are preferred on Wikipedia, if the actual source of information was a primary-source email from the Trump campaign, that's what should be cited. Because the source (Politico article) does not explicitly name those people and the reference gives no indication that we should be checking that small section of the article, it's functionally unverifiable and leaves a dead end (which could get worse if links break in the future). I would probably cite the Trump email using Template:Cite press release. Again, let me know if you have issues, and thanks for being responsive. Wracking 💬 03:27, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- OK, gotcha. That source provides a hyperlink under the "BACK ON THE TRUMP TRAIN" section, which should have all the people cited on there. Is that allowed or do referenced sources have to directly list the names on the page that is being cited? Thanks. Christhegeek517 (talk) 02:58, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- I'm a little confused on what you mean. Could you please highlight which reference is messed up? Thank you. Christhegeek517 (talk) 02:41, 6 May 2023 (UTC)