Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugg v Ryan (2nd nomination)

Rugg v Ryan

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Rugg v Ryan
• Articles for deletion/Rugg v Ryan (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Rugg v Ryan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is for a proposed litigation that was settled before it arose, and so refers to a court case that does not exist. Due to its settlement, the outcome of the court case was legally insignificant, and the case itself is not notable as a separate entry per se. I propose that content of this entry be deleted and reworked into the Wiki pages for Ryan & Rugg as persons; perhaps as a paragraph remarking that they litigated against each other. Jack4576 (talk) 07:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Politics, and Australia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:43, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
• Merge with Monique Ryan and Sally Rugg ––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 08:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
• Comment The last AfD was only closed a week ago. Thus seems a WP:POINTy nomination and not a good use of the community's time. As the nominator said in another AfD "once notable always notable". LibStar (talk) 08:31, 10 May 2023 (UTC)