Jump to content

Talk:Kim Kardashian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Burrito813 (talk | contribs) at 18:05, 16 March 2007 (→Why?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on February 1, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep and cleanup.


Keep The Photo

The Photo is fine. I spent 2 hours looking for it. I would be very upset if someone got rid of it. Thank You!


Why?

is this all it takes to be a person of note? be friends with a celebrity and have a sex tape? i knew Craig David at school and have a video of me with an ex girlfriend do i get a wikipedia page now? Kejoxen 21:33, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt that. And CD goes both ways anyways.74.195.3.199 04:12, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that she is definitely a person of note. She is getting national news attention (albeit mostly celebrity news). I came here looking for information after I read about her in the news so at least on that level I am glad that the article is here. Being the daughter of an O.J. attorney is noteable as well as the fact that there is a rather learge article on wikipedia regarding celebrity sex tapes. I definitely believe that this article needs to be cleaned up, but I think deletion would be premature, especially since she seems to be able to stay in the news. But that's just my opinion. Tinman8443 19:35, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
She has been in the news many times recently, she is a "celebrity" herself in that respect whereas you are not. Also, she has one or two businesses in the fashion area. She is of note and the article should not be deleted. (but it should be improved!) 66.254.246.198 05:06, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
After reading an article about her, I had no idea who she was. I googled her and found the Wikipedia entry. It told me all that I needed to know about her background. If it was useful to me, it might be useful to others. Sure, it could be improved (how about a photo?) but why delete it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.5.190.164 (talk) 07:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]
I think an article just on her sex tape would be more appropriate. Aside from the sex tape, there is nothing notible about her. She isn't really a celebrity (news coverage does not equal celebrity). Rather, she parties with them and all her media attention derives from her association with celebrity. She has done nothing of note. She should be a footnote in articles about others, but doesn't justify an article. 12.96.162.45 21:25, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion is premature but to call her a person of note when the only reason is the sex tape would Americanise the place too much. These sex videos happen all the tıme and others don't get wikipedia-ed. Boils 11:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check sources

Please check the sources you cite. I just removed a link citing the comments section on a gossip blog. --~ Mr. S 20:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kim_Kardashian&oldid=115604986"