Jump to content

Talk:Year

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JMF (talk | contribs) at 12:26, 28 May 2023 (The orbital period is mentioned but not given for comparison: Actual number in which year?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

Perfect

The short article under "Abbreviations for "years ago" is perfect - thank You!!" - however, regrettably too less known by those linguistically incompetent geologists.2A02:8108:9640:AC3:4DF8:A0AF:4F2D:BE71 (talk) 06:28, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 18 June 2022

Change Hegira to Hijrah اخسجہ (talk) 12:43, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: makes sense, given that the relevant article is Hijrah not Hegira. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:55, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done after checking histories and finding Talk:Hijrah#Requested move 9 February 2022. Copy-edited to avoid starting with "The Islamic Anno Hegirae" as if the Latin name were Islamic. NebY (talk) 15:39, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Already done Baggaet (talk) 17:32, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Colloquial use of word "sees"

The article is copy protected, I can't make even a minor edit. First paragraph: " the course of a year sees the passing of the seasons". The course of a year doesn't have eyes; it can't see anything. There are perfectly good, non-figurative words that can be used instead of "sees". How about "features"? 2604:2000:2FC0:F:E123:5FF5:2949:5DEF (talk) 01:44, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A reasonable comment but "features" isn't exactly an improvement: it refers to a single event. My first idea was "marks" but no: maybe the months mark the passing of the seasons but not the whole year. Anyone else? Meanwhile, "sees" is inoffensive. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 10:06, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The orbital period is mentioned but not given for comparison

it would be nice to have the actual number for the orbital period (365.2422) when it is mentioned to compare to the 400 year average approximation of 365.2425. Also, add citation https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/Numbers/Math/Mathematical_Thinking/calendar_calculations.htm Zectbumo (talk) 11:47, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actual number in which year? The whole point of taking a 400 year average is to even out the occasional tiny gravitational ripples that affect the seventh significant digit. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 12:26, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]