Jump to content

Talk:Alebrije

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sevenverde (talk | contribs) at 03:01, 14 June 2023 (Remove Art in NY- Wednesday - Spring 2023 assignment details). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconVisual arts C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconMexico B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconChildren's Museum of Indianapolis B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is related to the Children's Museum of Indianapolis. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alebrije. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Alebrije. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:59, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Huge sections are duplicated.

This entire needs a large edit. Several paragraphs are simply repeated word for word later. For example, the theme including "This version of the craft has since spread to a number of other towns, most notably San Martín Tilcajete and La Unión Tejalapan, become a major source of income for the area, especially for Tilcajete. The success of the craft, however, has led to the depletion of the native copal trees. Attempts to remedy this, with reforestation efforts and management of wild copal trees has only had limited success" is presented at the beginning and then again word for word further below. Thammer302 (talk) 22:02, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I feel likewise, perhaps reorganizing the article into sections would help. YamaPlos talk 18:07, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

papier mache is not cartoneria

Forgive the technology buff here :-), cartoneria, the craft of making figures using strips of paper and glue, and often plaster and paint, is as far from papier mache (paper fibers and glue) as, say, "real" paper and papyrus, or even amate, or tapa. Also, "cardboard" is problematic, nowadays meaning and bringing to mind the corrugated material, rather than what was "card board" in olden times, multiple layers of paper glued together, or very thick paper, "paper board". While modern cardboard is much used in modern cartoneria, it wasn't so by Mr. Linares, especially at first, as he was a "cartonero de oficio", and modern cardboard was unknown in Mexico. The concept of "plasterboard" can be helpful, but brings to mind the flat panels used in building houses in the US. I don't have a fix, alas, just a concern YamaPlos talk 18:06, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

split papercraft and wood carving, perhaps a separate specialized article for

The current article is too "heavy" with Oaxaca Alebrijes, and barely covers the original papercraft kind.
There is not just the technique differences, the Oaxaca Alebrijes section presents wood-carved alebrijes as being a regional thing, which of course they are, primarily, but fails to address diversity that does exist. Papercraft alebrijes were originally "Mexico City", but are much more widespread. Definitely something needs to be done... YamaPlos talk 16:09, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

cleanup weasel words

Too many of "the most", "the only", etc., with weak or no reference. Won't be tagging those just yet, but feel free to. I hope, though it's unlikely I'll be able to clean those any time soon. At least I did add a reference to one case, but I still feel that such superlatives can only be used when overwhelming agreement exists, and in something like art, that seldom would be the case YamaPlos talk 17:10, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Additional examples

The article does well in focusing on the history of the creation of the myth. However, it falls short in telling the actual myth. What role does an alebrije fill? What stories are told about them? 2600:1700:7971:3440:A0E0:EB70:1FEB:FE9F (talk) 04:30, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]