Jump to content

Talk:Apple I

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2600:1012:b18a:153d:887c:4d61:194f:d029 (talk) at 04:49, 17 June 2023 (→Clare: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

New Apple I info Slashdotted

Can someone grab the audio file and cassett pic from http://www.pagetable.com/?p=32 and post it here. Looks like its significant to this article. Lostwars --68.83.91.35 (talk) 14:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone fix the formatting?

I show the sidebar on the right as slightly overlapping the text. I am using Firefox 1.5.0.6. Will 05:12, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I put in a section break before the Reference section. I don't know if that helps you, but on Internet Explorer, it prevents the sidebar from overlapping into the References section in a visually unappealing way. Edu-Ward 18:25, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PET vs. Apple I

The apple clearly wasn't the first computer to be useful 'out of the box'. It wasn't sold with a monitor or a keyboard, or some kind of storage input device such as a cassette drive. Therefore, the first "Works out of the Box" computer was the PET, unveiled 6 months before the Apple II and a few months after the Apple I.

Apple I current price

An original Apple 1 computer sold on eBay for $17,950 on October 3, 2009. Item number 320431509242 -- SWTPC6800 (talk) 03:20, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keyboard

Is it true that the Apple 1 still needed a keyboard to connect with? Why is that? I mean if you look at the picture in the article, that computer appears to have a built-in set of keys on its surface. 121.58.216.46 (talk) 13:53, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After having a look in Apple Inc., I found that the Apple I which has a built-in keyboard on its surface is actually a remodelled version made by someone who purchased a unit. I wonder if there are any pictures of the Apple I in its original form? 121.58.216.46 (talk) 23:44, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

minus the wooden board, transformers and fan

Function

Would it be possible to address what the computer could do, and what users did with them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.126.123.101 (talk) 01:34, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


An Apple 1 just sold for $212,000

Read here: http://www.mercurynews.com/news/ci_16695428?source=rss 98.118.62.140 (talk) 05:03, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Satanism comment

I haven't read the Steve Jobs biography, so maybe someone could provide a reference, but the statement in here is that Steve Wozniak was a satanist. This is a pretty substantial claim, and since it is cited as the reason for the price of the original computer, is relevant to the article. That said, the claim must have a substantiating source. I've seen several pages' previews from a Google search, but none from websites that I would venture to visit from work. If there is no good source for this statement I submit that it should be removed. Without a source, all it does is make an unverifiable claim that smells of vandalism. Daytonduck (talk) 20:59, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neither Jobs nor Wozniak are or were satanists. Wozniak originally wanted to sell it at cost, but Jobs wanted to make a profit, and chose a price that allowed for a 33% markup over the $500 wholesale price. Neither knew the significance of 666 in Revelation. Wozniak later recalled that he liked "repeating digits" and that the phone number for his dial-a-joke service was 255-6666. Or so it is written in Jobs' biography. WTF? (talk) 17:14, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's not vandalism the original price was $666.66 2601:C:5600:27B:9A3:A075:2A97:D9F4 (talk) 18:39, 18 January 2015 (UTC)Johnnie DeHuff[reply]

release date

The info box lists a released date of April 11 but the article states July 1976. Is the former when the design was finalized? What is the preferred date to use? For example, most items such as records and movies will use when they go on sale. 22yearswothanks (talk) 19:32, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@ the computer history museum

https://test.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=File%3AApple_1_computer_at_the_computer_history_museum.jpeg feel free to migrateVictor Grigas (talk) 04:38, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hardware description

I dearly miss a description of the hardware. A 6502 cpu seems to have been used, like in the Apple ][ , but what was its clock frequency? How much ROM/RAM were present? Was the RAM SRAM or DRAM? &c &c ... Jan olieslagers (talk) 14:35, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another Apple I at an e-waste story?

A guy at the ACCRC told me in conversation pretty much exactly the same story back about 10 years ago. Someone dropped off an Apple I and toddled off. - Richfife (talk) 04:24, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Apple I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:08, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Apple I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:07, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

infobox image

Any reason the infobox shows the custom wooden cased Apple I? The actual Apple I was only sold as a bare motherboard, I think a more appropriate image would be the image of the bare board used further down in the article. Readers may mistake the current lead image with the wooden case as being how the device was sold. TarkusABtalk 20:04, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:37, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Character set merger

Should Apple I character set be merged into this? – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 00:12, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support:Merge the article according to context in WP:MERGEREASON--PATH SLOPU 10:00, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's an entirely unreferenced sub-stub - nothing we can be sure is reliable to merge. Boleyn (talk) 16:18, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hardware description 2

This article is severely incomplete, as Jan olieslagers mentioned already in 2016. It covers the subject almost entirely like a collector's item, rather than a technical capabilities overview, like with almost every early home computer article. CapnZapp (talk) 19:53, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CapnZapp-I've added an Overview section that attempts to describe the hardware more completely. Anything you think is missing?--agr (talk) 21:59, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. However, even in its current state, if I compare this article's table of contents to that of, I don't know, let's pick Apple II; there is only one section here that even starts describing the hardware (Overview) while there are nine (9) in the Apple II article. I understand Apple I is significantly more collectable, but this is Wikipedia, and not some collector's site. (I'm thinking of WP:NOT here) - I do not find it encyclopedic to devote much more space to collector details than to the history of Apple I development, its significance for computer and corporate history, its technical capabilities and shortcomings and so on. In other words, I have tagged this article because it does not treat its subject like other home computers of its era. Best regards, CapnZapp (talk) 08:50, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Apple One (service) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 16:22, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apple

Apple first computer 103.42.1.75 (talk) 09:37, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect name: it's "Apple 1," not "Apple I"

As far as I can tell, Apple never used the roman numeral, "Apple I," but always the number, "Apple 1" in contemporary documentation. The Apple-1 Operation Manual refers to the system as "the Apple Computer" in the text; on the cover it's "Apple-1" and on the schematics it's "Apple~1." This page should be renamed to match Apple's contemporary usage. Cjs (talk) 05:01, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apple 1 was designed and made by Steve Wozniak.

Apple 1 was designed in Steve Job's house not the garage, they later moved their and created in the garage 2601:205:C200:D0D0:F538:7B66:4E60:7AFA (talk) 20:39, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 5 January 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No Consensus to move (non-admin closure) >>> Extorc.talk 07:28, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

– The computer was only ever called "Apple 1" in the original manuals and all other original product literature that I've been able to find. The "Apple I" designation appears to be a later retronym derived from the Apple II after its appearance a couple of years later. The current "Apple I" page and "Apple 1" redirect page need to be swapped. Cjs (talk) 00:07, 5 January 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). – Ammarpad (talk) 06:38, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Another possibility

Looking at the DAB it seems to me that Apple 1 should be a primary redirect to Apple I.

Ammarpad, O.N.R., JIP, any comments on that possibility? Andrewa (talk) 10:18, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To editor Andrewa: noted above there is also an article titled Apple One, so then while one of them might be a primary topic/redirect, how would "one" pick between them? P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'r there 10:55, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This looks like a good idea, as the only other entry with its own article is Apple One, and that uses a different spelling. JIP | Talk 11:01, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It appears that [1] can also be considered an alternative "spelling", or at least an alternative form, of both [I] and [One]. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'r there 11:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it's relevant whether or not 1 and I and One are alternative spellings of the same word. Even if so that doesn't make Apple 1 and Apple I and Apple One alternative spellings of the same name. They may be. Or not.
Because that's not the way English works and nor does Wikipedia article naming policy.
The article at Apple One is IMO correctly named. That doesn't prevent Apple I being the correct name for that other article, nor does it prevent Apple 1 redirecting to it. Andrewa (talk) 00:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You could be right, and I could be wrong. Since Apple 1 presently titles a dab page and is ambiguous to both Apple One and Apple I, I think it best for Wp readers to leave things as they are. I think the present situation is best in spite of confusing names to help readers find what they are looking for. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'r there 17:03, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clare

This sign needs citation 2600:1012:B18A:153D:887C:4D61:194F:D029 (talk) 04:49, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Apple_I&oldid=1160540539"