Jump to content

Connectomics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BattyBot (talk | contribs) at 15:15, 19 June 2023 (Fixed reference date error(s) (see CS1 errors: dates for details) and AWB general fixes). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Connectomics is the production and study of connectomes: comprehensive maps of connections within an organism's nervous system. More generally, it can be thought of as the study of neuronal wiring diagrams with a focus on how structural connectivity, individual synapses, cellular morphology, and cellular ultrastructure contribute to the make up of a network. The nervous system is a network made of billions of connections and these connections are responsible for our thoughts, emotions, actions, memories, function and dysfunction. Therefore, the study of connectomics aims to advance our understanding of mental health and cognition by understanding how cells in the nervous system are connected and communicate. Because these structures are extremely complex, methods within this field use a high-throughput application of functional and structural neural imaging, most commonly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electron microscopy, and histological techniques in order to increase the speed, efficiency, and resolution of these nervous system maps. To date, tens of large scale datasets have been collected spanning the nervous system including the various areas of cortex, cerebellum,[1][2] the retina,[3] the peripheral nervous system[4] and neuromuscular junctions.[5]

Generally speaking, there are two types of connectomes; macroscale and microscale. Macroscale connectomics refers to using functional and structural MRI data to map out large fiber tracts and functional gray matter areas within the brain in terms of blood flow (functional) and water diffusivity (structural). Microscale connectomics is the mapping of small organisms' complete connectome using microscopy and histology. That is, all connections that exist in their central nervous system.

Methods

Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging is used to assess macroscale connectomics within the human brain. dMRI image series are used to map white matter tracts, and fMRI series are used to assess how blood flow correlates between connected gray matter areas.

Macroscale Connectomics

Macroscale connectomes are commonly collected using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI or DW-MRI) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). dMRI datasets can span the entire brain, imaging white matter between the cortex and subcortex. In contrast, fMRI datasets measure cerebral blood flow in the brain, as a marker of neuronal activation. One of the benefits of MRI is it offers in vivo information about connectivity between different brain areas. Macroscale connectomics has furthered our understanding of various brain networks including visual,[6][7] brainstem,[8][9] and language networks,[10][11] among others.

Microscale Connectomics

On the other hand, microscale connectomes focus on a much smaller area of the nervous system with much higher resolution. These datasets are commonly collected using electron microscopy imaging and offer single synapse resolution of entire local circuits. Some of the milestones in EM connectomics include the entire nervous system of C. elegans,[12] an entire fly brain,[13] and most recently a millimeter cube from both mouse[14] and human cortex.[15]

Tools

One of the main tools used for connectomics research at the macroscale level is MRI.[16] When used together, a resting-state fMRI and a dMRI dataset provide a comprehensive view of how regions of the brain are structurally connected, and how closely they are communicating.[17][18] The main tool for connectomics research at the microscale level is chemical brain preservation followed by 3D electron microscopy,[19] used for neural circuit reconstruction. Correlative microscopy, which combines fluorescence with 3D electron microscopy, results in more interpretable data as is it able to automatically detect specific neuron types and can trace them in their entirety using fluorescent markers.[20]

To see one of the first micro-connectomes at full-resolution, visit the Open Connectome Project, which is hosting several connectome datasets, including the 12TB dataset from Bock et al. (2011).

Model systems

Aside from the human brain, some of the model systems used for connectomics research are the mouse,[21] the fruit fly,[22][23] the nematode C. elegans,[24][25] and the barn owl.[26]

Caenorhabditis Elegans

The Caenorhabditis Elegans roundworm is a highly researched organism in the field of connectomics, of which a full connectome has been mapped using various imaging techniques, mainly serial-electron microscopy;[27] This process involved studying the aging process of the C. elegans brain by comparing varying worms from birth to adulthood.[28] Researchers found the biggest change with age is the wiring circuits, and that connectivity between and within brain regions increases with age.[28] Regardless of the massive achievement of mapping the full C. Elegans connectome, more information is yet to be discovered about this brain network; The researchers noted that this can be done using comparative connectomics, comparing and contrasting different species brain networks to pinpoint relations in behavior.[28]

The C. elegans has a simple nervous system, and data collection is more attainable. A study created a code that searches the connections within the C. elegans mapped connectome, as this data is already readily available. The findings were able to collect information about sensory neurons, interneurons, neck motor neurons, behavior, environmental influences and more in deep detail.[29] Overall, the experiment investigates the connection between neuroanatomy and behavior given that there is a lot of available information about the worm already discovered.[29]

To provide context, the C. elegans roundworm has 302 neurons and 5000 synaptic connections, while the human brain has 100 billion neurons and more than 100 trillion chemical synapses.[30] The human connectome has yet to be fully mapped with a limiting factor being the sheer amount of data collection that this will require in addition to the complexity in comparing individual connectomes given the great degree of variation in human neural circuits.[31]

The drosophila connectome is mostly complete, allowing a visual representation of the anatomical structure and an easier way for researchers to study drosophila neural circuits. Already, this has allowed researchers to identify differences in compartments and their electrophysiology characteristics.[32]

Mouse

An online database known as MouseLight displays over 1000 neurons mapped in the mouse brain based on a collective database of sub-micron resolution images of these brains. This platform illustrates the thalamus, hippocampus, cerebral cortex, and hypothalamus based on single cell projections.[33] Imaging technology to produce this mouse brain does not allow an in depth look at synapses, but can show axonal arborizations which contain many synapses.[34] A limiting factor to studying mouse connectomes, much like with humans, is the complexity of labeling all the cell types of the mouse brain; This is a process that would require reconstruction of 100,000+ neurons and the imaging technology is advanced enough to do so.[34]

Mice models in the lab have provided insight into genetic brain disorders, one study that manipulated mice with a deletion of 22q11.2 (chromosome 22, a likely known genetic risk factor that leads to schizophrenia).[35] Findings of this study showed that this impaired neural activity in mice’s working memory similar to as it does in humans.[35]

Leading Connectomics Labs

The Lichtman Lab of Harvard University is a leading force in the field of connectomics, investigating how synaptic connectivity and competition change with age using advanced imaging techniques on model organisms such as mice, zebra fish, and C. elegans.[36] This lab is led by neuroscientist, Harvard professor, and renowned researcher, Jeff Lichtman. The Lichtman Lab research had major impacts on the field of connectomics from their development of Brainbrow, which also had a spinoff expansion into Zebrabow technology from their work with zebra fish.[37] This is an in vivo imaging technique that uses multicolor cell labeling that allows researchers to distinguish by cell type and pathway using different Cre lines.[34]

Another notable lab is the Lee Lab of Harvard Medical School that aims to look at how neural networks are organized by function based on the observed activity of these circuits in model organisms, a field known as “functional connectomics”.[38]

Applications

A connectivity matrix assessing the functional connectivity between each brain region in the Default Mode Network (DMN). Here, shades of red indicate stronger coupling between two regions blood flow changes, and shades of blue indicate an anti-correlation between two regions.

By comparing diseased and healthy connectomes, we can gain insight into certain psychopathologies, such as neuropathic pain, and potential therapies for them. Generally, the field of neuroscience would benefit from standardization and raw data. For example, connectome maps can be used to inform computational models of whole-brain dynamics.[39][self-published source?] Current neural networks mostly rely on probabilistic representations of connectivity patterns.[40] Connectivity matrices (checkerboard diagrams of connectomics) have been used in stroke recovery to evaluate the response to treatment via Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.[41] Similarly, connectograms (circular diagrams of connectomics) have been used in traumatic brain injury cases to document the extent of damage to neural networks.[42][43]

The human connectome can be viewed as a graph, and the rich tools, definitions and algorithms of the Graph theory can be applied to these graphs. Comparing the connectomes (or braingraphs) of healthy women and men, Szalkai et al.[44][45] have shown that in several deep graph-theoretical parameters, the structural connectome of women is significantly better connected than that of men. For example, women's connectome has more edges, higher minimum bipartition width, larger eigengap, greater minimum vertex cover than that of men. The minimum bipartition width (or, in other words, the minimum balanced cut) is a well-known measure of quality of computer multistage interconnection networks, it describes the possible bottlenecks in network communication: The higher this value is, the better is the network. The larger eigengap shows that the female connectome is better expander graph than the connectome of males. The better expanding property, the higher minimum bipartition width and the greater minimum vertex cover show deep advantages in network connectivity in the case of female braingraph.

Local measures of difference between populations of those graph have been also introduced (e.g. to compare case versus control groups).[46] Those can be found by using either an adjusted t-test,[47] or a sparsity model,[46] with the aim of finding statistically significant connections which are different among those groups.

Human connectomes have an individual variability, which can be measured with the cumulative distribution function, as it was shown in.[48] By analyzing the individual variability of the human connectomes in distinct cerebral areas, it was found that the frontal and the limbic lobes are more conservative, and the edges in the temporal and occipital lobes are more diverse. A "hybrid" conservative/diverse distribution was detected in the paracentral lobule and the fusiform gyrus. Smaller cortical areas were also evaluated: precentral gyri were found to be more conservative, and the postcentral and the superior temporal gyri to be very diverse.

Comparison to genomics

The recent advancements in the field of connectomics has sparked conversation around its relation to the field of genomics. Recently, scientists in the field have highlighted the parallels between this project and large-scale genomics initiatives.[49] Additionally, they have referenced the need for integration with other scientific disciplines, particularly genetics. While genomics focuses on the genetic blueprint of an organism, connectomics provides insights into the structural and functional connectivity of the brain. By integrating these two fields, researchers can explore how genetic variations and gene expression patterns influence the wiring and organization of neural circuits.[50] This interdisciplinary approach helps uncover the relationship between genes, neural connectivity, and brain function. Additionally, connectomics can benefit from genomics by leveraging genetic tools and techniques to manipulate specific genes or neuronal populations in order to study their impact on neural circuitry and behavior.[49] Understanding the genetic basis of neural connectivity can enhance our understanding of brain development, neural plasticity, and the mechanisms underlying various neurological disorders.

The human genome project initially faced many of the above criticisms, but was nevertheless completed ahead of schedule and has led to many advances in genetics. Some have argued that analogies can be made between genomics and connectomics, and therefore we should be at least slightly more optimistic about the prospects in connectomics.[51] Others have criticized attempts towards a microscale connectome, arguing that we don't have enough knowledge about where to look for insights, or that it cannot be completed within a realistic time frame.[52]

Human Connectome Project

The Human Connectome Project (HCP)[53] is an initiative launched in 2009 by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) with the goal of mapping the neural pathways that underlie human brain function.[54] It aimed to acquire and share data on the structural and functional connectivity of the human brain, advancing imaging and analysis techniques to improve sensitivity, resolution, and utility in the field of human connectomics.[54] By understanding the wiring patterns within and across individuals, researchers hope to unravel the electrical signals that give rise to our thoughts, emotions, and behaviors. Additional programs within the Connectome Initiative, such as the Lifespan Connectome and Disease Connectome, focus on mapping brain connections across different age groups and studying connectome variations in individuals with specific clinical diagnoses.[54] The Connectome Coordination Facility serves as a centralized repository for HCP data and provides support to researchers.[54] The success of this project has opened the door to understanding how connectomics might be influential in other areas of neuroscience. The potential of a “Connectome II” project has been referenced recently, which would focus on developing a scanner designed for high-throughput studies involving multiple subjects.[55] The project would aim to utilize recent advancements in visualization technologies towards a higher spatial resolution in imaging structural connectivity.[55] Advancements in this area might also involve incorporating wearable mobile technology to acquire various types of behavioral data, complementing the neuroimaging information gathered by the scanner.[55]

Eyewire game

Main articles: Eyewire and Sebastian Seung

Eyewire is an online game developed by American scientist Sebastian Seung of Princeton University. It uses social computing to help map the connectome of the brain. It has attracted over 130,000 players from over 100 countries.

Business Development

Omniscient Neurotechnology, a startup out of Australia co-founded by Michael Sughrue and Stephane Doyen, is currently the primary business endeavor incorporating connectomics into their development of neuronal brain maps. These maps provide a comprehensive understanding of neural connections and cell-to-cell communication, which were previously inaccessible through MRI and CT scans.[56] This technology is targeted for surgeons and researchers who might utilize the maps to identify abnormal neural connections and misfiring neurons in order to make more precise decisions regarding surgeries and therapies.[57] The technology behind the brain maps was developed using machine learning algorithms applied to MRI scans, and it has been likened to “Google Maps for the brain”.[56] They have launched two products, “Quicktome'' and “Infinitome”. Quicktome is a digital brain mapping platform intended to provide neurosurgeons with insights into a patient's brain networks before performing brain surgery, ultimately working to streamline the process of neurosurgical planning and provide greater insights for patient care.[57] The platform uses data from a single non-invasive MRI scan, which is processed automatically and delivered through an intuitive web-based app.[57] The platform allows visualization of critical brain networks and helps neurosurgeons make more informed decisions, reduce surgical uncertainty, and have better patient conversations about surgical outcomes.[57] In 2021, Quicktome received regulatory clearance from the FDA, Health Canada, and the Therapeutic Goods Administration of Australia.[58] The company’s other product, “Infinitome”, defines a neuroscience research platform that allows for revolutionary data and image analysis of the brain using computational neuroscience6. It is a cloud-based platform that complies with HIPAA regulations, and it can transform raw MRI data into detailed functional network maps of the human brain.[58] By utilizing machine learning to automate the extraction of insights from brain data specific to individual patients, Infinitome is intended to accelerate the research and clinical trial processes related to complex diseases. Ultimately, Omniscient Neurotechnology is aimed at improving the diagnosis and treatment processes of brain-related disorders. The company recently raised $30 million in Series B funding, helping to support further research and technological development.[58]

Public Datasets

Websites to explore publicly available connectomics datasets:

Macroscale Connectomics (Healthy Young Adult Datasets)

For a more comprehensive list of open macroscale datasets, check out this article

Microscale Connectomics

See also

References

  1. ^ Quartarone, Angelo; Cacciola, Alberto; Milardi, Demetrio; Ghilardi, Maria Felice; Calamuneri, Alessandro; Chillemi, Gaetana; Anastasi, Giuseppe; Rothwell, John (2020-02-01). "New insights into cortico-basal-cerebellar connectome: clinical and physiological considerations". Brain. 143 (2): 396–406. doi:10.1093/brain/awz310. ISSN 0006-8950. PMID 31628799.
  2. ^ Nguyen, Tri M.; Thomas, Logan A.; Rhoades, Jeff L.; Ricchi, Ilaria; Yuan, Xintong Cindy; Sheridan, Arlo; Hildebrand, David G. C.; Funke, Jan; Regehr, Wade G.; Lee, Wei-Chung Allen (2021-11-30). "Structured connectivity in the cerebellum enables noise-resilient pattern separation". pp. 2021.11.29.470455. bioRxiv 10.1101/2021.11.29.470455v1.
  3. ^ Helmstaedter, Moritz; Briggman, Kevin L.; Turaga, Srinivas C.; Jain, Viren; Seung, H. Sebastian; Denk, Winfried (2013-08-07). "Connectomic reconstruction of the inner plexiform layer in the mouse retina". Nature. 500 (7461): 168–174. Bibcode:2013Natur.500..168H. doi:10.1038/nature12346. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 23925239. S2CID 3119909.
  4. ^ Phelps, Jasper S.; Hildebrand, David Grant Colburn; Graham, Brett J.; Kuan, Aaron T.; Thomas, Logan A.; Nguyen, Tri M.; Buhmann, Julia; Azevedo, Anthony W.; Sustar, Anne; Agrawal, Sweta; Liu, Mingguan (2021-02-04). "Reconstruction of motor control circuits in adult Drosophila using automated transmission electron microscopy". Cell. 184 (3): 759–774.e18. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.013. ISSN 0092-8674. PMC 8312698. PMID 33400916.
  5. ^ Boonstra, Tjeerd W.; Danna-Dos-Santos, Alessander; Hong-Bo, Xie.; Roerdink, Melvyn; Stins, John F.; Breakspear, Michael (2015). "Muscle networks: Connectivity analysis of EMG activity during postural control". Scientific Reports. 5: 17830. Bibcode:2015NatSR...517830B. doi:10.1038/srep17830. PMC 4669476. PMID 26634293.
  6. ^ Kammen, Alexandra; Law, Meng; Tjan, Bosco S.; Toga, Arthur W.; Shi, Yonggang (January 2016). "Automated retinofugal visual pathway reconstruction with multi-shell HARDI and FOD-based analysis". NeuroImage. 125: 767–779. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.005. ISSN 1053-8119. PMC 4691391. PMID 26551261.
  7. ^ Yogarajah, M.; Focke, N. K.; Bonelli, S.; Cercignani, M.; Acheson, J.; Parker, G. J. M.; Alexander, D. C.; McEvoy, A. W.; Symms, M. R.; Koepp, M. J.; Duncan, J. S. (2009-05-21). "Defining Meyer's loop-temporal lobe resections, visual field deficits and diffusion tensor tractography". Brain. 132 (6): 1656–1668. doi:10.1093/brain/awp114. ISSN 0006-8950. PMC 2685925. PMID 19460796.
  8. ^ Nieuwenhuys, Rudolf; Voogd, Jan; van Huijzen, Christiaan (2008). The Human Central Nervous System. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-34686-9. ISBN 978-3-540-34684-5.
  9. ^ Paxinos, George; Xu-Feng, Huang; Sengul, Gulgun; Watson, Charles (2012), "Organization of Brainstem Nuclei", The Human Nervous System, Elsevier, pp. 260–327, doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374236-0.10008-2, ISBN 9780123742360, retrieved 2021-12-07
  10. ^ Glasser, Matthew F.; Rilling, James K. (2008-02-14). "DTI Tractography of the Human Brain's Language Pathways". Cerebral Cortex. 18 (11): 2471–2482. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn011. ISSN 1460-2199. PMID 18281301.
  11. ^ Catani, Marco; Jones, Derek K.; ffytche, Dominic H. (2004). "Perisylvian language networks of the human brain". Annals of Neurology. 57 (1): 8–16. doi:10.1002/ana.20319. ISSN 0364-5134. PMID 15597383. S2CID 17743067.
  12. ^ White, J. G.; Southgate, E.; Thomson, J. N.; Brenner, S. (1986-11-12). "The structure of the nervous system of the nematodeCaenorhabditis elegans". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences. 314 (1165): 1–340. Bibcode:1986RSPTB.314....1W. doi:10.1098/rstb.1986.0056. ISSN 0080-4622. PMID 22462104.
  13. ^ Scheffer, Louis K; Xu, C Shan; Januszewski, Michal; Lu, Zhiyuan; Takemura, Shin-ya; Hayworth, Kenneth J; Huang, Gary B; Shinomiya, Kazunori; Maitlin-Shepard, Jeremy; Berg, Stuart; Clements, Jody (2020-09-03). Marder, Eve; Eisen, Michael B; Pipkin, Jason; Doe, Chris Q (eds.). "A connectome and analysis of the adult Drosophila central brain". eLife. 9: e57443. doi:10.7554/eLife.57443. ISSN 2050-084X. PMC 7546738. PMID 32880371.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  14. ^ Bae, J. Alexander; Baptiste, Mahaly; Bodor, Agnes L.; Brittain, Derrick; Buchanan, JoAnn; Bumbarger, Daniel J.; Castro, Manuel A.; Celii, Brendan; Cobos, Erick; Collman, Forrest; et al. (MICrONS Consortium) (2021-07-29). "Functional connectomics spanning multiple areas of mouse visual cortex". bioRxiv 10.1101/2021.07.28.454025.
  15. ^ Shapson-Coe, Alexander; Januszewski, Michał; Berger, Daniel R.; Pope, Art; Wu, Yuelong; Blakely, Tim; Schalek, Richard L.; Li, Peter; Wang, Shuohong; Maitin-Shepard, Jeremy; Karlupia, Neha (2021-05-30). "A connectomic study of a petascale fragment of human cerebral cortex". bioRxiv 10.1101/2021.05.29.446289.
  16. ^ Wedeen, V.J.; Wang, R.P.; Schmahmann, J.D.; Benner, T.; Tseng, W.Y.I.; Dai, G.; Pandya, D.N.; Hagmann, P.; et al. (2008). "Diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging (DSI) tractography of crossing fibers". NeuroImage. 41 (4): 1267–77. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.036. PMID 18495497. S2CID 2660208.
  17. ^ Damoiseaux, Jessica S.; Greicius, Michael D. (2009-10-01). "Greater than the sum of its parts: a review of studies combining structural connectivity and resting-state functional connectivity". Brain Structure and Function. 213 (6): 525–533. doi:10.1007/s00429-009-0208-6. ISSN 1863-2661. PMID 19565262. S2CID 16792748.
  18. ^ Honey, C. J.; Sporns, O.; Cammoun, L.; Gigandet, X.; Thiran, J. P.; Meuli, R.; Hagmann, P. (2009-02-10). "Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106 (6): 2035–2040. Bibcode:2009PNAS..106.2035H. doi:10.1073/pnas.0811168106. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 2634800. PMID 19188601.
  19. ^ Anderson, JR; Jones, BW; Watt, CB; Shaw, MV; Yang, JH; Demill, D; Lauritzen, JS; Lin, Y; et al. (2011). "Exploring the retinal connectome". Molecular Vision. 17: 355–79. PMC 3036568. PMID 21311605.
  20. ^ BV, DELMIC. "Neuroscience: Synaptic connectivity in the songbird brain - Application Note | DELMIC". request.delmic.com. Retrieved 2017-02-16.
  21. ^ Bock, Davi D.; Lee, Wei-Chung Allen; Kerlin, Aaron M.; Andermann, Mark L.; Hood, Greg; Wetzel, Arthur W.; Yurgenson, Sergey; Soucy, Edward R.; et al. (2011). "Network anatomy and in vivo physiology of visual cortical neurons". Nature. 471 (7337): 177–82. Bibcode:2011Natur.471..177B. doi:10.1038/nature09802. PMC 3095821. PMID 21390124.
  22. ^ Chklovskii, Dmitri B; Vitaladevuni, Shiv; Scheffer, Louis K (2010). "Semi-automated reconstruction of neural circuits using electron microscopy". Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 20 (5): 667–75. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2010.08.002. PMID 20833533. S2CID 206950616.
  23. ^ Zheng, Z (2018). "A Complete Electron Microscopy Volume of the Brain of Adult Drosophila melanogaster". Cell. 174 (3): 730–743. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.019. PMC 6063995. PMID 30033368.
  24. ^ Chen, B. L.; Hall, D. H.; Chklovskii, D. B. (2006). "Wiring optimization can relate neuronal structure and function". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 103 (12): 4723–8. Bibcode:2006PNAS..103.4723C. doi:10.1073/pnas.0506806103. PMC 1550972. PMID 16537428.
  25. ^ Perez-Escudero, A.; Rivera-Alba, M.; De Polavieja, G. G. (2009). "Structure of deviations from optimality in biological systems". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106 (48): 20544–9. Bibcode:2009PNAS..10620544P. doi:10.1073/pnas.0905336106. PMC 2777958. PMID 19918070.
  26. ^ Pena, JL; Debello, WM (2010). "Auditory processing, plasticity, and learning in the barn owl". ILAR Journal. 51 (4): 338–52. doi:10.1093/ilar.51.4.338. PMC 3102523. PMID 21131711.
  27. ^ "WormWiring". www.wormwiring.org. Retrieved 2023-06-19.
  28. ^ a b c Witvliet, Daniel; Mulcahy, Ben; Mitchell, James K.; Meirovitch, Yaron; Berger, Daniel R.; Wu, Yuelong; Liu, Yufang; Koh, Wan Xian; Parvathala, Rajeev; Holmyard, Douglas; Schalek, Richard L.; Shavit, Nir; Chisholm, Andrew D.; Lichtman, Jeff W.; Samuel, Aravinthan D. T. (August 2021). "Connectomes across development reveal principles of brain maturation". Nature. 596 (7871): 257–261. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03778-8. ISSN 1476-4687.
  29. ^ a b Izquierdo, Eduardo J.; Beer, Randall D. (2013-02-07). "Connecting a Connectome to Behavior: An Ensemble of Neuroanatomical Models of C. elegans Klinotaxis". PLOS Computational Biology. 9 (2): e1002890. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002890. ISSN 1553-7358.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  30. ^ "Overview". medicine.yale.edu. Retrieved 2023-06-19.
  31. ^ "What is Connectomics?". News-Medical.net. 2019-04-11. Retrieved 2023-06-19.
  32. ^ Scheffer, Louis K; Xu, C Shan; Januszewski, Michal; Lu, Zhiyuan; Takemura, Shin-ya; Hayworth, Kenneth J; Huang, Gary B; Shinomiya, Kazunori; Maitlin-Shepard, Jeremy; Berg, Stuart; Clements, Jody; Hubbard, Philip M; Katz, William T; Umayam, Lowell; Zhao, Ting (2020-09-03). Marder, Eve; Eisen, Michael B; Pipkin, Jason; Doe, Chris Q (eds.). "A connectome and analysis of the adult Drosophila central brain". eLife. 9: e57443. doi:10.7554/eLife.57443. ISSN 2050-084X.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  33. ^ "MouseLight". www.mouselight.janelia.org. Retrieved 2023-06-19.
  34. ^ a b c Winnubst, Johan; Bas, Erhan; Ferreira, Tiago A.; Wu, Zhuhao; Economo, Michael N.; Edson, Patrick; Arthur, Ben J.; Bruns, Christopher; Rokicki, Konrad; Schauder, David; Olbris, Donald J.; Murphy, Sean D.; Ackerman, David G.; Arshadi, Cameron; Baldwin, Perry (2019-09-19). "Reconstruction of 1,000 Projection Neurons Reveals New Cell Types and Organization of Long-Range Connectivity in the Mouse Brain". Cell. 179 (1): 268–281.e13. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.042. ISSN 0092-8674.
  35. ^ a b Sigurdsson, Torfi; Stark, Kimberly L.; Karayiorgou, Maria; Gogos, Joseph A.; Gordon, Joshua A. (April 2010). "Impaired hippocampal–prefrontal synchrony in a genetic mouse model of schizophrenia". Nature. 464 (7289): 763–767. doi:10.1038/nature08855. ISSN 1476-4687.
  36. ^ "Research". lichtmanlab.fas.harvard.edu. Retrieved 2023-06-19.
  37. ^ Pan, Y. Albert; Freundlich, Tom; Weissman, Tamily A.; Schoppik, David; Wang, X. Cindy; Zimmerman, Steve; Ciruna, Brian; Sanes, Joshua R.; Lichtman, Jeff W.; Schier, Alexander F. (July 2013). "Zebrabow: multispectral cell labeling for cell tracing and lineage analysis in zebrafish". Development (Cambridge, England). 140 (13): 2835–2846. doi:10.1242/dev.094631. ISSN 1477-9129. PMC 3678346. PMID 23757414.
  38. ^ "Research". Lee Lab | Wei-Chung Allen Lee, PhD. Retrieved 2023-06-19.
  39. ^ http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Connectome[unreliable medical source?][permanent dead link‍]
  40. ^ Nordlie, Eilen; Gewaltig, Marc-Oliver; Plesser, Hans Ekkehard (2009). Friston, Karl J. (ed.). "Towards Reproducible Descriptions of Neuronal Network Models". PLOS Computational Biology. 5 (8): e1000456. Bibcode:2009PLSCB...5E0456N. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000456. PMC 2713426. PMID 19662159.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  41. ^ Yeung, Jacky T.; Young, Isabella M.; Doyen, Stephane; Teo, Charles; Sughrue, Michael E. (October 2021). "Changes in the Brain Connectome Following Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation". Cureus. 13 (10): e19105. doi:10.7759/cureus.19105. ISSN 2168-8184. PMC 8614179. PMID 34858752.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  42. ^ Van Horn, John D.; Irimia, A.; Torgerson, C.M.; Chambers, M.C.; Kikinis, R.; Toga, A.W. (2012). "Mapping connectivity damage in the case of Phineas Gage". PLOS ONE. 7 (5): e37454. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...737454V. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037454. PMC 3353935. PMID 22616011.
  43. ^ Irimia, Andrei; Chambers, M.C.; Torgerson, C.M.; Filippou, M.; Hovda, D.A.; Alger, J.R.; Gerig, G.; Toga, A.W.; Vespa, P.M.; Kikinis, R.; Van Horn, J.D. (6 February 2012). "Patient-tailored connectomics visualization for the assessment of white matter atrophy in traumatic brain injury". Frontiers in Neurology. 3: 10. doi:10.3389/fneur.2012.00010. PMC 3275792. PMID 22363313.
  44. ^ Szalkai, Balazs; Varga, Balint; Grolmusz, Vince (2015). "Graph Theoretical Analysis Reveals: Women's Brains Are Better Connected than Men's". PLOS ONE. 10 (7): e0130045. arXiv:1501.00727. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1030045S. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130045. PMC 4488527. PMID 26132764.
  45. ^ Szalkai, Balázs; Varga, Bálint; Grolmusz, Vince (2017). "Brain size bias compensated graph-theoretical parameters are also better in women's structural connectomes". Brain Imaging and Behavior. 12 (3): 663–673. doi:10.1007/s11682-017-9720-0. ISSN 1931-7565. PMID 28447246. S2CID 4028467.
  46. ^ a b Crimi, Alessandro; Giancardo, Luca; Sambataro, Fabio; Diego, Sona (2019). "MultiLink analysis: brain network comparison via sparse connectivity analysis". Scientific Reports. 9 (1): 1–13. Bibcode:2019NatSR...9...65C. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37300-4. PMC 6329758. PMID 30635604.
  47. ^ Zalesky, Andrew; Fornito, Alex; Bullmore, Edward (2010). "Network-based statistic: identifying differences in brain networks". NeuroImage. 53 (4): 1197–1207. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.041. PMID 20600983. S2CID 17760084.
  48. ^ Kerepesi, Csaba; Szalkai, Balázs; Varga, Bálint; Grolmusz, Vince (2018). "Comparative connectomics: Mapping the inter-individual variability of connections within the regions of the human brain". Neuroscience Letters. 662 (1): 17–21. arXiv:1507.00327. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2017.10.003. PMID 28988973. S2CID 378080.
  49. ^ a b Chen, Patrick B.; Flint, Jonathan (2021-07-16). "What connectomics can learn from genomics". PLOS Genetics. 17 (7): e1009692. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009692. ISSN 1553-7404. PMC 8318269. PMID 34270560.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  50. ^ Arnatkeviciute, Aurina; Fulcher, Ben D.; Bellgrove, Mark A.; Fornito, Alex (2021-12-01). "Where the genome meets the connectome: Understanding how genes shape human brain connectivity". NeuroImage. 244: 118570. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118570. ISSN 1053-8119.
  51. ^ Lichtman, J; Sanes, J (2008). "Ome sweet ome: what can the genome tell us about the connectome?". Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 18 (3): 346–53. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2008.08.010. PMC 2735215. PMID 18801435.
  52. ^ Vance, Ashlee (27 December 2010). "Seeking the Connectome, a Mental Map, Slice by Slice". The New York Times.
  53. ^ "Human Connectome Project", Wikipedia, 2023-06-01, retrieved 2023-06-19
  54. ^ a b c d "Connectome Programs | Blueprint". neuroscienceblueprint.nih.gov. Retrieved 2023-06-19.
  55. ^ a b c Elam, Jennifer Stine; Glasser, Matthew F.; Harms, Michael P.; Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N.; Andersson, Jesper L. R.; Burgess, Gregory C.; Curtiss, Sandra W.; Oostenveld, Robert; Larson-Prior, Linda J.; Schoffelen, Jan-Mathijs; Hodge, Michael R.; Cler, Eileen A.; Marcus, Daniel M.; Barch, Deanna M.; Yacoub, Essa (2021-12-01). "The Human Connectome Project: A retrospective". NeuroImage. 244: 118543. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118543. ISSN 1053-8119.
  56. ^ a b Pratap, Aayushi. "This Startup Raised $30 Million To Create Brain Maps To Aid Surgeries And Therapeutics". Forbes. Retrieved 2023-06-19.
  57. ^ a b c d "Brain Mapping for Neurosurgeons | Omniscient Neurotechnology". www.o8t.com. Retrieved 2023-06-19.
  58. ^ a b c "Omniscient Announces FDA-Clearance of New MRI-based Functional Brain Analysis Technology". Yahoo Finance. 2023-06-02. Retrieved 2023-06-19.

Further reading

"New map IDs the core of the human brain". Brain Mysteries. 2008-07-02. Archived from the original on 2008-07-03.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Connectomics&oldid=1160924190"