Welcome to the miscellaneous section
of the Wikipedia reference desk.

Select a section:

WP:RD/M

Want a faster answer?

Main page: Help searching Wikipedia

How can I get my question answered?

Select the section of the desk that best fits the general topic of your question (see the navigation column to the right).
Post your question to only one section, providing a short header that gives the topic of your question.
Type '~~~~' (that is, four tilde characters) at the end – this signs and dates your contribution so we know who wrote what and when.
Don't post personal contact information – it will be removed. Any answers will be provided here.
Please be as specific as possible, and include all relevant context – the usefulness of answers may depend on the context.
Note:
- We don't answer (and may remove) questions that require medical diagnosis or legal advice.
- We don't answer requests for opinions, predictions or debate.
- We don't do your homework for you, though we'll help you past the stuck point.
- We don't conduct original research or provide a free source of ideas, but we'll help you find information you need.

Ready? Ask a new question!

How do I answer a question?

Main page: Wikipedia:Reference desk/Guidelines

The best answers address the question directly, and back up facts with wikilinks and links to sources. Do not edit others' comments and do not give any medical or legal advice.

June 15

Are these part of UK?

Are UK overseas territories, such as Cayman Islands, Turks and Caicos Islands and Pitcairn part of the United Kingdom, like Martinique, Guadeloupe, Reunion, Mayotte and French Guiana are part of France? I don't like that the flags of the five aforementioned French overseas departements have no official status, unlike UK overseas territories flags. Are there any instances of French overseas departments' flags shown with theeitories' names in English Wikipedia rather than French flag. I also don't like that the overseas departements are too closely tied with France. --40bus (talk) 20:56, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@40bus: The difference is in your post, overseas territories versus overseas departments. Overseas departments and regions of France says: "They have exactly the same status as mainland France's regions and departments." It's like Hawaii which is one of 50 US states with exactly the same status as the 49 mainland states. A French overseas collectivity has a different status. The British Overseas Territories "do not form part of the United Kingdom itself". PrimeHunter (talk) 21:12, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since the OP doesn't like it, where should they go to complain? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 02:16, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The government of France. PrimeHunter (talk) 03:45, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like that the residents of UK overseas territories are not allowed to vote in the UK general elections and cannot freely relocate to Great Britain and take a job there. The residents of the overseas regions of France can vote in the legislative elections in France and can freely move to mainland France. --Lambiam 09:07, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since 2002 almost all British Overseas Territories citizen also hold British citizenship and so do have the right to live and work in the UK. The right is not, however, reciprocal. DuncanHill (talk) 09:21, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The advantage of the British over the French system is that territories can decide to become independant whenever they want; for example Belize which was granted independence in 1981. Gibraltar is a special case; it can only choose to remain British or be returned to Spain because of the terms of the Treaty of Utrecht (in a 2002 referendum, 99% of Gibraltarians voted to stay British). Alansplodge (talk) 21:25, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 17

Check the source

Good afternoon! In the article https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00172091 says "This hypothesis has a longish history, dating back at least to Leibenstein (1957)." and "Leibenstein H (1957) Economic backwardness and economic growth. Wiley, New York". How do you check the existence of these theses in that source, if it is not on the Internet? Thank you in advance. Vyacheslav84 (talk) 08:40, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This book? (You can search it without borrowing it.) I don't know what I'd do, if it wasn't on the internet. In principle there are libraries of physical books and librarians who could be convinced to check things for you, if you wanted to go to the trouble of contacting them. That's probably the way. Or another option would be to buy an old copy and resell it later, but this requires a certain dedication to checking facts. I see the page you provided also has a link to Google Scholar.

One quote from the book:

We distinguish among three types of utility to be derived from an additional birth and two types of cost. The types of utility are: (1) the utility to be derived from the child as a "consumption good," namely, as a source of personal pleasure to the parents; (2) the utility to be derived from the child as a productive agent, that is, at some point the child may be expected to enter the labor force and contribute to family income; and (3) the utility derived from the prospective child as a potential source of security, either in old age or otherwise.

There's more like this on subsequent pages. I recommend a search for "old age" (in quotes). Card Zero (talk) 12:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but there are only 14 pages. --Vyacheslav84 (talk) 16:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Depending on where you live you may also have the option to lend it through your library even if they do not themselves have a copy. In some countries public libraries cooperate through a system where one library can request a book from another library for a limited time. You have to pay a fee and it may take a few days (or even weeks depending on availability), but it may still be cheaper than to buy the book. Some libraries also offer to send you a scan or copy of short sections of books for a fee; as with the first option you usually have to be a member/user of a different library in the same system.

Also, Wikipedia has a system where volunteers with access to good libraries help other users to get sources they need for their work on Wikipedia articles: WP:WikiProject_Resource_Exchange/Resource_Request -- Random person no 362478479 (talk) 13:55, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Vyacheslav84 (talk) 16:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Small 'inconsistency'

Hello. If you look at the link on the page below, where the nationality of people born in the UK is described, you can read before the 'breakdown' of the three constituent Nations, that most people of white ethnicity born in Britain prefer to put their national identity first despite being British citizens. However, I want to focus on England alone; if most white people call themselves 'English', why under the heading of England alone is everything 'turned on its head', so that most people tend to call themselves British instead of English? Perhaps the white population is not taken into account or is it in the minority in that particular context? Thank you very much. http://projectbritain.com/nationality.htm 93.41.98.58 (talk) 19:58, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First let's be clear, this is the work of one Mandy Barrow of Woodlands Junior School. Barrow may be an expert, or may just be someone trying to help 6 year-olds out; whatever the case, the site has no relationship with Wikipedia. Mathematically her claims are just possible. Of the 60 million living on the island, "most" could be as little as 31 million. If all the Scots and Welsh prefer Scottish and Welsh, then than would mean 25 million English prefer "English" and 31 million "British". As I said, mathematically possible but absolutely no authoritative sources are quoted and the "facts" are dubious in the extreme. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 20:35, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

National identity, England and Wales: Census 2021 from the Office for National Statistics says:

In England:

*15.3% of people selected an "English" only identity (a decrease from 60.4% in 2011)

*56.8% of people selected a "British" only identity (an increase from 19.2% in 2011)

*72.1% of people (40.7 million) selected either an "English" only or "British" only identity (a decrease from 79.6%, or 42.2 million, in 2011)

*14.3% of people selected both "English" and "British" identity (an increase from 9.1% in 2011)

It suggests that the decrease in those identifying as "English" only, might have been because "British" had been moved to the top of the list on the census form issued in England. Make of that what you will.

However, the assertion that "most people of white ethnicity born in Britain prefer to put their national identity first" is obviously just plain wrong.Alansplodge (talk) 21:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No Sex Please, We're British. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 22:27, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [reply]

Package shipping

I want to ship a 15 pound box (containing mostly clothes) from California to New York. It is not fragile and delivery is not urgent. The contents won't fit in a USPS flat rate package ($22.80) and the online price calculators for random boxes that weight at USPS, UPS Ground, Fedex etc. are all $60+. That seems pretty crazy since I can get a plane ticket for around $120 with a bit of advance planning. Any suggestions of a cheaper way to ship? Greyhound apparently stopped doing package delivery a year or so ago. USPS Media Mail would be around $13. This box doesn't qualify as media, but that rate shows how gouged the other prices are. Thanks for any ideas. 2601:644:8500:C9F0:0:0:0:38B4 (talk) 21:53, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Exact destination and package size will determine your cost. I just did a quote check at ups.com for a medium size package to Buffalo NY from Beverly Hills CA and it is showing $18.15 for ground shipping. This is for the flat rate shipping that is up to 50 pounds. Going to a larger box is $24.55. It likely varies depending on the source and destination address, so you may just want to talk to someone there on the phone directly to get some assistance. RudolfRed (talk) 22:45, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the large flat rate box is about 0.5 cubic foot which is too small for these bulky clothes. Alternatives seem to cost a fortune. I have indeed been using shipping calculators that take the src and dst addresses, weight, and dimensions. I haven't talked to anyone on the phone yet but I guess I can try. I was hoping for "try XYZ discount shipping at [url]" or something like that. I know big online stores can't pay nearly as much for shipping as USPS/UPS/etc claim to charge. 2601:644:8500:C9F0:0:0:0:38B4 (talk) 23:51, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added: this looks promising, 1 cubic foot for $26.05. This didn't show up through normal navigation on the UPS site or their rate calculator. I found a mention of it through a wider web search. I think I can pack the stuff I want to send into 1 cubic foot. 2601:644:8500:C9F0:0:0:0:38B4 (talk) 00:24, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See if splitting it into multiple smaller packages is cheaper. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 04:55, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The comparison with a plane ticket is somewhat flawed: with a bit of advance planning, your ticket will be cheaper than average. At $120, it's barely enough to cover the fuel cost (around 100 litres/passenger). You are self-loading cargo, your package isn't. Last mile delivery is also quite labour intensive. The driver of the van with medium packages spends several minutes handling your package only. A smaller package (as suggested above) may put it in a different van, handling far more packages per hour. PiusImpavidus (talk) 10:16, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 18

Burger King doesn't sell regular cheeseburgers and hamburgers separately now?

Is this a well-known thing, or is my local BK just being weird? The only way to get your basic hamburger or cheeseburger is as part of a kids' meal - they said they don't sell them separately any more! Seriously - they actually have them in stock but straight up refused to sell me one on its own the other day. Utterly bizarre. Iloveparrots (talk) 16:19, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Probably depends on your country/region/franchise. Still on the menu and available in the UK. Nanonic (talk) 16:37, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If they're jerking you around, ask for the manager, and tell them you'll spend your money at McDonald's henceforth. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 17:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the staff member was messing with me for the sake of it - she said that there wasn't even an entry on the till system for a single basic cheeseburger and therefore couldn't sell me one. Very weird. Iloveparrots (talk) 20:25, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Burger King May Have Secretly Discontinued These Menu Items (March 2022) describes the deletion of several items (mostly salad) from US Burger King menues, but no mention of regular hamburgers. Alansplodge (talk) 21:08, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Have you tried any other BK's in your region? Maybe it's just that one store. Years ago, McD's used to sell what was called a "double cheeseburger". They eventually took it off the menu so they could promote Quarter Pounders and Big Macs and such. But you could still get a double cheeseburger. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 21:36, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can order double cheeseburgers and double hamburgers on Canadian order kiosks. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:44, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aye! And so can any man. But do they come when you do order them? (With apologies to WS) {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.l195} 46.65.228.117 (talk) 13:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 19

Color conversion formula with respect to sea temperature.

The climate chapters of some articles have templates for sea temperature, for example New York City, Detroit, and Tromsø, Norway. But I don't know what is the formula for converting the input temperature value to the output color value? Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 04:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't figure it out either. This seems to be user:D.Nino doing something idiosyncratic. They are color values put directly into tables. Template:Weather box, on the other hand, uses Module:Weather box/colors. It would be logical to make use of that, but here's what I get if I input the sea temperature values for New York City, January to July:

5.44.34.57.311.418.122.3

This doesn't match. The high value is orange alright (too orange, I think) but the low value isn't blue.

I thought maybe it's some simple gimmick like subtracting a value, so I tried subtracting 29:

5.44.34.57.311.418.122.3

This still doesn't match. I guess there's a formula where the input value is multiplied by something, and then something is subtracted, and then the result is fed into the Lua to get the color value.

On closer inspection, I don't think it's possible to get the color used there for June (#FFE9A1) using the Lua color_t function: it hasn't got enough blue in it. The color_t function produces something like #FFE9D4 as the closest match. So I don't know what function's being used, maybe it's only an imitation of the color_t function.

However, multiplying by 3 and subtracting 45 gives results which are close (I included August this time):

5.44.34.57.311.418.122.323.4

Pretty much as required apart from the 18.1 (June) color value.

By the way, I had trouble understanding how _temperature_color() works until I learned that .. in Lua means string concatenation. So it's in three stages: first it chooses the two hex digits for R, then it appends the G, then it appends the B. Card Zero (talk) 14:58, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why should Detroit have a "sea temperature" template? Detroit is located on a freshwater river, hundreds of miles from the Atlantic Ocean. Cullen328 (talk) 18:00, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Change it to say water temperature then. Lots of places are on water but not on the ocean, there's no need to say a river isn't important enough for the climate box when the information is available. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 19:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It makes sense for the color to be different cause the range is smaller. Even the saltiest ocean water (which is usually the hot, dry inland parts like Israel in summer) would get ice crust by about minus 2C and the coldest possible NaCl brine is -21.1C while a weather station has seen minus 89.2C. In non-hurricane desiccating zones the sea has (so far) never been much above 30 and anywhere in the world has only been about as hot as a male rectum (hot desert sea). I don't know what's the record hot lakewater, riverwater or water body in general temp but since water has more thermal inertia than land and air and cools and humidifies any nearby desert it's probably not even 54C (which has happened in air). Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 18:40, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hope this helps:

	function hex( $value )
	{
		return sprintf( "%02X", $value );
	}


	function range_pos( $value, $start, $stop )
	{
		if ( $start < $stop )
		{
			if ( $value < $start )
			{
				return 0;
			}
			elseif ( $value > $stop )
			{
				return 1;
			}
			else
			{
				return ( $value - $start ) / ( $stop - $start );
			}
		}
		else
		{
			if ( $value < $stop )
			{
				return 1;
			}
			elseif ( $value > $start )
			{
				return 0;
			}
			else
			{
				return ( $start - $value ) / ( $start - $stop );
			}
		}
	}


	function sea_color( $val )
	{
		$item       = "";
		$background = "";
		$text_color = "";
		if ( $val < 17 )
		{
			$item       = range_pos( $val, 0, 17 ) * 255;
			$background = hex( $item );
		}
		else
		{
			$item       = range_pos( $val, 60, 30 ) * 255;
			$background = hex( $item );
		}
		if ( $val <= 17 )
		{
			$item       = range_pos( $val, 0, 17 ) * 255;
			$background = $background . hex( $item );
		}
		else
		{
			$item       = range_pos( $val, 30, 17 ) * 255;
			$background = $background . hex( $item );
		}
		if ( $val < 17 )
		{
			$item       = range_pos( $val, - 17, 0 ) * 255;
			$background = $background . hex( $item );
		}
		else
		{
			$item       = range_pos( $val, 20, 17 ) * 255;
			$background = $background . hex( $item );
		}
		if ( $val <= 7 OR $val >= 27 )
		{
			$text_color = "FFFFFF";
		}
		else
		{
			$text_color = "000000";
		}
		return array (
			"#" . $background,
			"#" . $text_color
		);
	}


list( $background, $text_color ) = sea_color ( $val );

Note: temp ( $val ) is in C

--D.Nino (talk) 21:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@D.Nino: In addition, can you create a watertemperature template, you can refer to the weatherbox template, because I don't know the Lua language. Thanks! Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 09:51, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, a distinction needs to be made between fresh water temperature (rivers, lakes) and sea water temperature. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 09:52, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Suspicion of Josef Mengele's alleged death

Mengele's name was mentioned several times during the Nuremberg trials in the mid-1940s, but the Allied forces believed that he was probably already dead. Irene Mengele and the family in Günzburg also alleged that he had died. Working in West Germany, Nazi hunters Simon Wiesenthal and Hermann Langbein collected information from witnesses about Mengele's wartime activities. In a search of the public records, Langbein discovered Mengele's divorce papers, which listed an address in Buenos Aires.

This whole story sounds odd to me. Why would the allied forces have assumed he was dead? Viriditas (talk) 08:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Have you followed up the citation in the article and read the reference work to which the statement is sourced? {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 46.65.228.117 (talk) 09:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Posner & Ware 1986a, pp. 76, 82. It says Mengele's father and spouse convinced the American authorities he was dead. The author argues that the case stopped there. The author also goes on to say that a former employee of Mengele's, Dr. Gisella Perl, a gynecologist at Auschwitz, tried desperately to convince the authorities of Mengele's many crimes, but was mostly ignored by US authorities. This lack of communication seems to have contributed to the failure of the counsel at Nuremberg to cross-check reports of his death, attributed to a mistaken finding of an official in the Locator and Apprehension Branch in Nuremberg, which was relayed to the US--all of which is attributed by the author to the combined efforts of Mengele's father and spouse. It sounds quite far-fetched, that an important Nazi asset like Mengele was assumed dead without any serious verification, and blamed on his family. Very odd. Viriditas (talk) 09:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You find this far-fatched, as it happens, I don't: both are personal reactions. I have no referenced facts, but I see the aftermath of WW2 as a time of chaos, confusion, and greatly overstretched human and organisational resources, where it would be quite understandable for harrassed officials to accept allegations, no less credible than many others they were dealing with, at face value and move onto the next nightmare.

Mengele's case later assumed greater significance precisely because he was belatedly perceived as having slipped through the net, and because the nature and extent of his crimes had become more apparent, but at the time he was just one more on a very long list of alleged and actual, alive and dead, possibly alive and probably dead, war criminals. Dealing with them was, of course, not unimportant, but in most individual and goverment minds probably had less priority than rebuilding shattered national economies and infrastructures, and dealing with millions of refugees and other displaced persons. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 46.65.228.117 (talk) 07:24, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Might there also have been legal issues pursuing him into South America? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 10:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undoubtably, once it was realised that he probably wasn't dead and was probably in South America, but the OP is querying why initially the relevant Allied authorities accepted the (false) reports that he was dead. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 46.65.228.117 (talk) 12:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to our article, Mengele visited Germany — using a passport showing his real name — in 1956. Of course that was before these things were largely computerized, but still, no one noticed that name? Did his notoriety perhaps come later, as a result of Wiesenthal's efforts or something? --Trovatore (talk) 19:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article makes it fairly clear that the authorities at that time thought he was dead (so he probably wasn't included on any relevant watch lists), and 'Mengele', though not a common surname, is not unique. It's also possible that if any German official did realise who he was, they might not have wanted to draw attention to him – many Germans remained passively sympathetic to nazism or at least didn't want to actively aid the occupying Allied powers (I speak as one who briefly lived in West Germany in the '70s). Weisenthal's efforts indeed only succeeded in reviving interest in pursuing him from 1959 onwards. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 46.65.228.117 (talk) 01:06, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 21

Too fancy a name for a plain country girl?

Would it be halfway-plausible for a young lady from a small provincial Russian town (more specifically, from Kostroma) to have the name "Adelaida" (Russian for Adelaide)? And, would it be halfway-plausible for her to be a flight instructor specializing in fighter jets such as the Mig-29 and/or the Su-27 and their derivatives? 2601:646:9882:46E0:7DE6:4D87:FC8E:D68 (talk) 12:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 13:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why what? 2601:646:9882:46E0:7DE6:4D87:FC8E:D68 (talk) 13:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think someone from the rural areas can't have a particular name or career? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 13:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, as far as the name, because it's Western in origin, and there's very little Western influence in Russia outside of the Moscow and St. Pete areas -- and as far as the career, it's because rural parts of Russia are very impoverished, so it's hard for someone from those areas to get into a high-skilled occupation (and doubly so for a woman to get into a highly-skilled and traditionally male-dominated line of work). But, of course, there are exceptions to (almost) every rule (barring the laws of nature, of course) -- and, besides, Kostroma is not that much of a backwater (not like Sretensk, for example -- which is so far away from the core part of Russia that it's actually more Chinese than Russian now)! 2601:646:9882:46E0:7130:A393:E500:58CF (talk) 01:06, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It would have to be very old or very recent according to a coworker who moved from Georgia (when it was part of the USSR) to the United States. She told me, and I have verified it with a quick Internet search, the women were phased out as fighter pilots in the 1970s. It was just a few years ago that women were allowed to begin training as fighter pilots again. 97.82.165.112 (talk) 14:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Beethoven's song "Adelaide", "Adelaida" in Russian, was also popular in Russia, and Kostroma is not a godforsaken place in the backwaters of Russia. Is the person in question alleged to be a a flight instructor now, in 2023? --Lambiam 18:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info! In case you must know, this is for a work of fiction that I've recently started -- and it's quite a story to explain why the character in question must be a woman named Adelaide, must be from Kostroma and must be a flight instructor who can fly fighter jets! So, from what you've told me, this combination is unusual but not completely implausible, right? 2601:646:9882:46E0:7130:A393:E500:58CF (talk) 01:06, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I didn't know Beethoven wrote songs for Sinatra to sing in musicals. If you can hear it in your head, you're welcome. --Trovatore (talk) 18:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [reply]

Unfortunately I can only remember the chorus, which is now on repeat. Curse you. Better Sinatra than Brando, I suppose. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 19:46, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A friend of mine once said about Brando's rendition of Luck Be a Lady that it was good enough to enjoy, but not so good that you didn't think he had sung it himself. --Trovatore (talk) 19:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [reply]

Let's not forget Beethoven's famous "Moonlight Sinatra". ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 20:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A classic! 199.208.172.35 (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1990 Bantala rape case

I am searching for pictures related to this mass rape murder case. The picture can be copyrighted, from any book, journal, magazine, newspaper, inline archive. But should be taken during that time 1990 or 1991.

1990_Bantala_rape_case

The women were not gangraped by 5,6 men(I mentioned the number, as that number of accused, I read in gangrape news, but I never read such high number of accused and yet media is not discussing how top ministers were justifying the crime) but almost 50 to 70 men as per a Bengali newspaper report I read in 2007. Proloysant (talk) 14:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Difference between illusory correlation and synchronicity

Is there a (substantial) difference between illusory correlation and synchronicity? My reading of both articles shows they're essentially the same. 212.180.235.46 (talk) 21:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They are very similar, but not the same. In the first, there are two entities that vary in time and have measurable aspects that can be tracked as time elapses. Say one is the sales figures of root beer and the other the market price of a bitcoin. These tracks can look similar purely by chance. In the second, there are two events that happen at instants of time. Say one is a conjunction of Venus and Mars, and the other is a princess getting engaged. These events can happen very close in time to each other by pure chance. --Lambiam 23:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 22