User talk:RogerRadbit

June 2023

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:45, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't vandaliSe anything. RogerRadbit (talk) 11:23, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

RogerRadbit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm intending to make no further edits and I haven't vandalised anything, in future I would try to use the talk page as I have before on other edits RogerRadbit (talk) 16:48, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I'm intending to make no further edits and I haven't vandalised anything, in future I would try to use the talk page as I have before on other edits [[User:RogerRadbit|RogerRadbit]] ([[User talk:RogerRadbit#top|talk]]) 16:48, 25 June 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I'm intending to make no further edits and I haven't vandalised anything, in future I would try to use the talk page as I have before on other edits [[User:RogerRadbit|RogerRadbit]] ([[User talk:RogerRadbit#top|talk]]) 16:48, 25 June 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I'm intending to make no further edits and I haven't vandalised anything, in future I would try to use the talk page as I have before on other edits [[User:RogerRadbit|RogerRadbit]] ([[User talk:RogerRadbit#top|talk]]) 16:48, 25 June 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

RogerRadbit (talk) 16:48, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:28, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RogerRadbit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

has my block removal request been deleted? Here it is again. I don't see that it was a deliberate attempt to disrupt the page if I'm honest as I said that some people theorise.. this is part of a neutral outside debate on the matter. Noone disputes that it's bad for the region but it wildly accepted that some Ukr and Russians are working together. I understand your reasoning but respectfully disagree that it was deliberate. It was in good faith.

I intend to make no further edits on this page. RogerRadbit (talk) 16:30, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not provide sufficient assurance that the inappropriate edits will not recur nor tells us what edits you intend to make instead. 331dot (talk) 16:35, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.