Talk:Potato

Calling them irish potatoes in america

Hi,

The etymology ends with potatoes sometimes being called “Irish or white potatoes in America to distinguish them from sweet potatoes.” Has anyone ever actually heard an American call a potato an irish or white potato? Maybe that detail should be omitted.

Lit, ~~ Blob400 (talk) 06:01, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

That sentence cites the Oxford English Dictionary (OED) as its source. Unless you can verify that the information does not appear at that source, it will remain. The content of Wikipedia is not based on the experiences of our editors, but on the information published by cited sources. General Ization ^Talk 06:09, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

I have no problem with the source, but is it really appropriate for our article to mention what a fraction of less than 5% of the world's population sometimes incorrectly call potatoes. It looks like a bit of US-centrism to me. Something can be well sourced, but insignificant and trivial. HiLo48 (talk) 07:00, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Without having done any significant analysis, I can find more than 800k online references to "irish potato" -famine and 500k references to "white potato". I don't think either term is derogatory or offensive as applied to potatoes, so I don't see any need to remove the terms from our article, or to invest more time in debate about them. The single sentence, appropriately in the Etymology section, is hardly undue. General Ization ^Talk 07:07, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

It's not just in the USA that the term is used. See e.g. [1] and [2] from Rwanda, [3] from Kenya and [4] from Nigeria. SmartSE (talk) 13:52, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

@General Ization you seem to be mistaking the term "Irish potato famine" for "Irish-potato famine". The famine is not named after the "Irish potato", it was a famine involving the potato which occurred in Ireland. This is not evidence of the use of "Irish potato" as a term. Adhiyana (talk) 12:13, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

It is probably an old saying, or only in certain art of america as I have never heard them be called Irish potatoes we just call them plain potatoes, regular potatoes, or just potatoes. Woolmadj (talk) 17:38, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Does anybody know if this could be a regional dialect? I've lived on the west coast of the US most of my life and never heard "Irish potato" used. NoseSniffer (talk) 20:51, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

@Adhiyana: Perform the same Google searches that I did and you'll find plenty of evidence for the use of "Irish potato" as a common term (neither a derogatory nor offensive one). Also, university extension services are generally reliable sources for such things; see https://plants.ces.ncsu.edu/plants/solanum-tuberosum/, for example. No one was claiming that the famine in Ireland was named for the potato; the question was whether Americans actually use the term to refer to Solanum tuberosum. They do. General Ization ^Talk 02:12, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

@Adhiyana: By the way, you apparently didn't realize that the Google search term "irish potato" -famine means to show hits on "Irish potato" that don't include the word "famine", since I wasn't interested in articles that referred to the famine in Ireland. General Ization ^Talk 02:20, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

@General Izationyes that is correct, I did not know this search method Adhiyana (talk) 02:23, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

The list

What is up with the absurdly long list of different scientific names? At least make it collapsable. 98.128.166.100 (talk) 09:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

@98.128.166.100 agreed, the layout of this page is a complete mess, some months ago I tried to move the taxonomy section to a lower part of the article but this edit was immediately reverted, on mobile this article's readability is severely impacted Adhiyana (talk) 12:10, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 30 August 2022

179.6.199.103 (talk) 17:13, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

La papa es oriunda de Perú, hasta se ha encontrado evidencia cientifica de sus orígenes en este pais, no de Chile como indica wikipedia. En el año 2006 Chile quiso inscribir como patrimonio más de 286 variadades de papas pero la cancillería de Perú respondió contundentemente en base a estudios científicos.

 Not done Wikipedia articles summarize what published reliable sources say. You need to furnish a published reliable source that says potato cultivation began in Chile as opposed to Peru/Bolivia. Cullen328 (talk) 17:22, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. The article states "The potato was first domesticated in the region of modern-day southern Peru and northwestern Bolivia[5] by pre-Columbian farmers, around Lake Titicaca.[6] It has since spread around the world and become a staple crop in many countries.

The earliest archaeologically verified potato tuber remains have been found at the coastal site of Ancon (central Peru), dating to 2500 BC.[56][57] The most widely cultivated variety, Solanum tuberosum tuberosum, is indigenous to the Chiloé Archipelago, and has been cultivated by the local indigenous people since before the Spanish conquest.[27][58]"

Translation of request, for those watching at home, courtesy of google: The potato is native to Peru, even scientific evidence of its origins has been found in this country, not in Chile as indicated by wikipedia. In 2006, Chile wanted to register more than 286 varieties of potatoes as heritage, but the Peruvian Foreign Ministry responded forcefully based on scientific studies. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:23, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

American Cancer Society is good medical source

@user:bon courage has reverted my edit and seems to be disputing the source and my representation of it. The main medical source is the American Cancer Society, which I believe satisfies WP:MEDRS. The top of the article has the classification of Acrylamide by other national and intl organisations, so it is representing the scientific consensus that Acrylamide is probably carcinogenic, as I stated in my edit. I'm not sure what I'm misrepresenting. The other sources, while not medical, also reach the same conclusion and added details. Therefor I am re-adding my edit. Brian Shaposky (talk) 19:08, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

You have already been warned for edit warring. Yes, the ACS is a good WP:MEDRS. And WP:V is a core policy. Bon courage (talk) 19:27, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

The scientific consensus in the beginning of the article that acrylamide is "probably carcenogenic to humans" from the IARC for example. Also, you removed the part that cooking potatoes at high temps increases the amount of acrymalide. The quote you use from the source is about "dietary acrylamide", but acrylamide from burning foods is not part of a normal diet. Brian Shaposky (talk) 19:54, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Yes it is. If you want to introduce stuff about cooking temperature effects that could be okay; putting it just into the lede is not. Bon courage (talk) 20:01, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

What makes you believe acrylamide from burnt food is included in the umbrella term "dietary acrylamide"? Brian Shaposky (talk) 20:13, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

The words in the source. If it's eaten, it's dietary; if it's not eaten it doesn't have health effects. Anyway, I have added a new source to quell any doubt. From the sources it seems the acrylamide-causes-cancer idea is a debunked health scare of yesteryear. Bon courage (talk) 20:20, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 November 2022

I suggest removing the words "and a fruit" from the first sentence of the article, changing "a root vegetable and a fruit native to the Americas" to "a root vegetable native to the Americas". Even if the potato plant does produce fruits, its fruits are not used in cuisine and probably not safely edible; the tubers are not fruits; and these words were added by a user whose edits to other articles seem to consist mostly of vandalism. 2607:FEA8:12A2:4300:0:0:0:F9AC (talk) 21:57, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for spotting that - I have removed it. It was added by a vandal just over a month ago [5]. SmartSE (talk) 22:03, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Number of varieties

Section 2.3, Genetics, begins There are about 5,000 potato varieties worldwide, whereas 2.4, Varieties, a mere four paragraphs later, asserts There are close to 4,000 varieties of potatoes; a difference of 1,000 is fairly substantial. Neither statement seems to be referenced, so i can't determine which is correct. Anyone have any idea which is? Happy days ~ Lindsay^Hello 19:56, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

After a tad bit of research I believe the 5,000 was a typo and was meant to be 4,000. Woolmadj (talk) 17:40, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

semi protected edit request: smashed potatoes

There's nothing New England about a smashed potato (source, a proud New Englander would be happy to claim credit were it at all possible) so that either needs a cite or just take those couple of words out and leave the smashed potato in. You can google it, it ain't. 2603:8001:D3F0:87E0:0:0:0:10D0 (talk) 06:17, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

the table shows 100g of potato has almost half a day's worth of recommended potassium, but the text seems to claim that is not a significant amount

the table shows 100g of potato has almost half a day's worth of recommended potassium, but the text seems to claim that is not a significant amount 68.235.169.222 (talk) 10:42, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Comparison to other staple foods and nutritional content

I think the part about nutritional content in this article could be clearer. Many articles about food has a simple table of the sort "Nutritional value per 100 g (3.5 oz)" which is really good when trying to do a quick approximate lookup.

Having a huge table comparing dry weight to other staple foods seems a bit out of place in an article that's primarily about potatoes. To me that table fits much better in the article about staple food Staple food#Comparison of 10 staple foods where it also exists, rather than being in lots of individual articles for each staple food. To me, the article about Cassava for instance is much easier to use for looking up nutrition while still offering a link to the staple food comparison. Bricksprovidecoal (talk) 13:49, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Bricksprovidecoal - Agree about removing the large nutrition table. Use the cassava nutrition section and table format as an example, and WP:FIXIT. Here are the USDA nutrition data for a raw potato. Watching for your edit. Zefr (talk) 16:45, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Without commenting of the desirability of the huge table, it may be suspect. I have looked at just one value, raw sweet potato beta-carotene. Table says 36996μg now; USDA says 8510μg. Best wishes, Pol098 (talk) 19:22, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

@Pol098: Yes and 77.3 % water. (8510/22.7) x 100 = 37488. I converted everything to dry weight after first proposing it nine years ago. It's impossible to fairly compare potatoes (and sweet potatoes) with cereals if you do not account for the vastly different water contents. SmartSE (talk) 09:37, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, makes perfect sense. I noticed the "raw sweet potato" (G) footnote, but the enormous beta-carotene number caught my eye eye and I missed the (blatantly obvious) "dry weight". Maybe I was just a bit stupid, or maybe a comment for the table would be justified? "Many published tables show weight including water content, which is much lower", Best wishes, Pol098 (talk) 10:28, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

What would editors think of collapsing the section and table for comparison to other staple foods and just having a specific section on nutrition for both raw and boiled potatoes (FoodData Central has several choices for cooked)? It seems this is the clearer presentation for the common user, as opposed to the comparison table which unfocuses attention on potato nutrition. I would be happy to compose this revision and have the USDA table for cooked potato as the main data presentation. Zefr (talk) 15:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

@Zefr: Sounds reasonable to me. I doubt that there is much difference between raw and cooked, but if there is any data on different ways of cooking them, e.g. fries vs. boiled, that would be good to include. More generally, it would be good to mention how some nutrients vary widely between varieties. This source is probably too primary but shows what I mean, but there is hopefully a better source out there. SmartSE (talk) 16:49, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

With this edit, I used FoodData Central for nutrient data of boiled potatoes with skin, assuming this is the most common cooking method. Data are also available for boiled from frozen, and microwaved with/without skin. Apologies - there are no USDA data for raw potato nutrient contents - an unlikely preparation for eating. There are no nutrient data for French fries or different potato varieties. Open into how we make this better. Zefr (talk) 19:07, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Looks good but on my screen at least, it does result in a lot of white space. Something else worth including is patatin which isn't even mentioned yet and include how potatoes are a complete protein source (i.e. containing all the essential amino acids) per [6]. The GI info is also poorly sourced (primary) and simplistic, something like this would be a better source. Some mention of the role of preventing scurvy during the Irish famine and WW2 may also be worthy of mention. SmartSE (talk) 22:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

The comparison table is clumsy and unnecessary, presenting much more information than the common user would want. It's causing the white space in the presence of the potato nutrition table. I recommend deleting it and the introductory content with it.

On your other suggestions, I'll leave those for now for other editors to include. Zefr (talk) 23:32, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

The comparison table is included in most of the other crop articles, but I agree it is a lot of information and {{see also}} link would be an alternative way to show it. Looking at this it states Note that there are two sets of data for raw (uncooked potatoes) - USDA and FDA. The USDA data are specific to the potato type analyzed, while the FDA data represent a “market-basket” analytic approach, utilizing a weighted average of the nutrients found in potato varieties available to US consumers. Because these values can vary so widely, it would be better to use the FDA data but we also need to add the caveat that the values are for typical US potatoes. This seems to be an up to date version although oddly the values are out of date according to this source. The downside of that data is some values are only as %DV so need to be recalculated to give grams. This may be a better source though it's USDA but based off 8 samples. It's raw and without skin, but raw is probably better to use since cooking method can affect nutrient levels, particularly vitamin C e.g.. Another slight tangent, is that we should include some discussion of nutrition of the skin as it's a common misconception that it contains significant amounts of nutrients this from Potatoes USA and this from growingproduce.com discuss that but neither are great sources. Apologies if I'm overthinking this all! SmartSE (talk) 08:32, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Oh and the text should also clarify that nearly all of the carbs are starch. SmartSE (talk) 08:36, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

1) I'll move the comparison table to See also. 2) as people do not eat raw potatoes, I assumed this is why the USDA-FoodData Central (FDC) site no longer has nutrient data for raw (at one time, it did). This also justifies use of the nutrition table for cooked potatoes as representative of what people consume. Most or all (?) of our plant-food articles with nutrition sections use the USDA-FDC tables, where analyses have been done. 3) As we don't have reliable nutrition data for non-American potatoes, I think we have to stay with this and not be too concerned with slight geographic or cultivar variation. 4) likewise, for nutrients in skin specifically, there are no reliable sources other than the USDA-FDC tables where skin was included - should we have a separate nutrition table for this? I didn't think it was justified. 5) I've looked through PubMed, but don't see better sources to discuss potato starch more than we say in the paragraph on GI. Zefr (talk) 15:54, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 May 2023

I wanted to add that a new potato species has been found in the northern half of Ireland. AidenPlayz835 (talk) 00:35, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Lightoil (talk) 00:44, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Add Swedish to the earth-apple part

In some variants of Swedish, jordäpple (jordappel, jolappel) is or has been used for potatoes, so "at least 7" can be changed to "at least 8". Source: https://svenska.se/saob/?sok=jord%C3%A4pple#U_J1_193122 I'm guessing Norwegian could also be added to that list, but I don't have a source for that. 84.216.33.26 (talk) 09:47, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

I agree. You can add this yourself. Invasive Spices (talk) 13:56, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

wikt:no:jordeple — Invasive Spices (talk) 14:02, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

How? I don't have an account and this page is semi-protected. 84.216.33.26 (talk) 10:07, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

I didn't see that. I've added {{Edit semi-protected}} for you. Invasive Spices (talk) 14:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC)