User talk:RedactedUser300

RedactedUser300, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi RedactedUser300! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bsoyka (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Lil Skies discography. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:23, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for this. RedactedUser300 (talk) 21:59, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lil Gnar (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lil Gnar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lil Gnar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CUPIDICAE💕 20:59, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lil Gnar (April 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Probably notable, but needs more support from reliable sources. Only sources 1 through 7 are inline, and of those, 2 are not reliable (Instagram, YouTube).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lil Gnar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lil Gnar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 22:17, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lil Gnar (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

The comment the reviewer left was:

If you wish the draft be deleted, please place {{Db-U1}} at the top of the page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lil Gnar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lil Gnar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:09, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Landon Cube (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Links to billboard charts and Apple music are not WP:RS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Landon Cube and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Landon Cube, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 01:55, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Landon Cube 2 (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No references support notability. Association with other artists does not make for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Landon Cube 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Landon Cube 2, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:40, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flags

Hi, you recently added flags to Jake Paul, you seemed to be confused why they had previously been removed so since you have now been reverted (not by me) I thought I would give you a heads up on why they are generally excluded. The editor that reverted you cited WP:FLAGCRUFT, which includes some concerns with the use of flags. I'm neutral on the manner, but thought I'd let you know because it's always good to be informed when you are reverted. How else are you meant to learn? --TylerBurden (talk) 16:23, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up! I was very confused why flags had been removed from all fighter records because I checked a few others after I changed Jake's, still confused as to why they have been removed in that regard but wiki has its own reasons behind the scenes. Thanks again for educating me on the matter. RedactedUser300 (talk) 16:56, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Landon Cube (July 20)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Velella was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Duplicate of Draft:Landon Cube 2 . Creating more than one draft about the same subject is usually seen as trying to game the system. No notability here. If further edits are justified please edit the older draft.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:39, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This was an accident making more than one page, I keep asking for Landon Cube 2 to be deleted but it never gets done. RedactedUser300 (talk) 15:53, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where, exactly, have you ask that it be deleted? This looks very much like gaming the system by keeping two options open and hoping nobody will notice. You were still actively editing both versions yesterday add unreliable and spammy sources. I don't think that this is going anywhere. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:23, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well at first I placed the Db-U1 at the top of the Draft:Landon Cube page which got ignored over two times, as I wanted to delete that one in order for Draft:Landon Cube 2 to be renamed without the 2 as I was editing that one then I tried to get Landon Cube 2 deleted using the same tag which again got ignored. I left it a while then edited Landon Cube 2 yesterday with more reliable sources and when I pressed submit it redirected me to another page where I clicked an option and then Landon Cube (1) was submitted so I just carried over the edits and left them on Landon Cube (1) as it was already submitted. Also explain how they are "unreliable and spammy sources" as I have seen multiple pages with worse sources and fewer (which have been my complaints when submitting this page and my previous Lil Gnar draft) yet they still get the go ahead to be uploaded to the main space, so please explain that. RedactedUser300 (talk) 22:25, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lets get to the facts. You nominated the draft for deletion on 6 June under G7 but this was rejected as you were not the originating author. You made no other deletion requestions but you then went on to expand the draft while, at the same time expanding Draft:Landon Cube 2. I think that any rational editor would find that odd. Secondly, I would agree that there are many articles with appalling sourcing - please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS for more on that. If you care to provide me with a list I will review for nominations to AfD. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:46, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the original author? I definitely made the page in my sandbox. If I'm not who is?. And I strictly remember doing it more than once, why would I lie? If they didn't go through the system that ain't on me. I've been editing both yes, I have admitted this from the start but that is only because Landon Cube 2 is the redirect from my sandbox but whenever I submit it for acceptance to the main space it just sends Landon Cube off instead so I carry the edits over. I haven't intentionally made 2 pages, it just happened, I couldn't even tell you how. I just think if other pages get through with next to no sources get through being submitted and uploaded to the main space what's the big issue with mine. One feedback was "Apple Music" isn't reliable or notable which I personally don't understand because A LOT of artist pages use Apple Music links. But the links I want reviewed are basically all of the references on the page (also some links are reused as I don't know how to relink it without making it spammy if that makes sense, If I ctrl C + V them they just duplicate but on some pages it will label them with the same number once per use, any tips with that?). RedactedUser300 (talk) 22:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talia Mar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Talia Mar, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talia Mar. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:16, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Talia Mar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Talia Mar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talia Mar (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:28, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page is deleted can I still re-upload it as a draft to then be accepted? I didn't mean to put it on the main space, I added it to draft under my name as It said Talia Mar wasn't available so I submitted it as my name then move it to article (which I didn't think was the main space and I thought only admins could approve that) then I moved it again to draft (which found after I moved it to article) , which I thought would remove the page from the main space. RedactedUser300 (talk) 14:56, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it to mainspace myself as the subject meets WP:MUSICBIO#C2; my apologies for not posting here.--Laun chba ller 15:04, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh right, thanks for moving it to the mainspace. Kinda confused why people want it deleted, don't know what that's about I feel like the page has good sources and adds to the site but people will try delete all pages it seems. RedactedUser300 (talk) 16:54, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Hello, I'm Sahaib. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Zerkaa have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sahaib (talk) 18:25, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would appreciate if you told me A. What that means and B. How. I also cannot use my sandbox currently as I have a page redirect which I don't know how to get rid of. Any tips? RedactedUser300 (talk) 22:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for butting in, but "sandbox" is just one name. You can actually have many sandboxes if needed and used responsibly . Just create User:RedactedUser300/sanbox2 for example to create a different sandbox or User:RedactedUser300/mylatestarticleinprogress . Just an examples. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:13, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh right brilliant, and how exactly would I do that? I'm sort of still getting used to the site so I'm not sure on things still. RedactedUser300 (talk) 22:18, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just click on one of the weird (mispelled) redlinks that I invented. Start writing text on the page and hit "publish changes". The quasi sandbox is created! Simples! Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant thank you so much! RedactedUser300 (talk) 01:51, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've started work on User:RedactedUser300/sanbox2 but my references keep messing up and going a line below, ruining the format, would you be able to have a look and let me know how to fix it please, and some feedback on the page would be good too if possible? RedactedUser300 (talk) 13:00, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, sorry for the spam as I know you have yet to reply to my previous message but I was wondering if you could check out my draft I just submitted Draft:Rah Swish and see if it is ready enough to submit/move into the main space. The help asked in my previous message still stands as I have yet to finish and fix that page. RedactedUser300 (talk) 16:03, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Talia Mar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Talia Mar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talia Mar (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

RedBaron12 (talk) 17:07, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Fighting Demons, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 06:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need add pointless information in articles, Wikipedia is not a place to add trivia (WP:TRIVIA). TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 04:17, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It’s not pointless information though is it. It is information about the various editions of the albums and the dates they were released with the relevant information. You kept them after they were referenced so why delete them again? RedactedUser300 (talk) 14:00, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it has been used to evade blocks on one or more other accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock. To do so, first read the guide to appealing blocks, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} to the bottom of the talk page of your original account. JBW (talk) 22:13, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rah Swish

Hello, RedactedUser300. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rah Swish, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rah Swish

Hello, RedactedUser300. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rah Swish".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]