Talk:Code42
Code42 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 4, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Code42 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Reviewed for Conflict
Can't find anything blatantly advertising like or incorrect. Comparing user counts via alexa and compete, it appears they are more relevant than many providers listed in wikipedia.
I modeled this article based on the format and content used in the currently posted article about Backblaze. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backblaze
Not sure what is missing in the CrashPlan article that makes it a candidate for removal. Please offer specific suggestions about what needs to be changed.
Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariecrashplan (talk • contribs)
Cleanup request
{{request edit}} There was previously a separate article on the company's software Crashplan and in the merge things got a little mixed up. A lot of the content became redundant, poor grammar, etc. I would like to propose the following:
- Delete the Reviews section. I don't think it makes sense to have it now that the article is focused on the company.
- Delete the software infobox. It's crowding the article, which already has a company infobox. Also, most of the info in the box is repeated elsewhere.
- Replace the Software and Features sections with a couple paragraphs (leaving the Reception section in). This section got muddled up in the merge and became over-sized and redundant. Just a couple paragraphs about the products should be all that's needed.
Proposed Crashplan section (to replace Software and services & Features)
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Update Key People
BerkshireQueen14 (talk) 19:44, 12 June 2020 (UTC)BerkshireQueen14 References
Update Key People
BerkshireQueen14 (talk) 17:38, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
References Updates Requested/NeededAt some point in the past the CrashPlan article was merged in with the Code42 article. As of July 2022, CrashPlan the product has been spun out from Code42 and is its own entity focused on backup and recovery whereas Code42 are continuing on their course to provide Insider Risk Management: https://www.crashplan.com/en-us/crashplan-receives-investment-from-mill-point-capital/ https://twitter.com/crashplan/status/1554832245579337728?s=20 I cannot edit the article as 1) I am a brand new baby editor and 2) I work for an involved party and want to be respectful of the community guidelines against edits in that case. Can someone help me out and make sure that it's clear that CrashPlan is in no way affiliated with Code42 at this juncture? It would be helpful to create a dedicated "CrashPlan" page which focuses on the product and indicates that there is a separation. Rileybruce (talk) 21:31, 7 April 2023 (UTC) |
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- All unassessed articles
- GA-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/03 November 2012
- Accepted AfC submissions
- GA-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- GA-Class software articles
- Low-importance software articles
- GA-Class software articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Software articles
- GA-Class Minnesota articles
- Low-importance Minnesota articles
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions
- Implemented requested edits