User talk:173.46.67.114

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Content Disarm & Reconstruction, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorials
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 23:54, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Content Disarm & Reconstruction, you may be blocked from editing. Come on. You're adding non-notable companies with their company links. Drmies (talk) 23:58, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Do_not_disrupt_Wikipedia_to_illustrate_a_point

This isn't a hill to die on, we are all trying to create something better here. If you want to flesh out the article more with additional sources, I might be open to removing the references to existing implementations. 173.46.67.114 (talk) 00:05, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Content Disarm & Reconstruction shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 00:18, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you suggest as an alternative approach to prevent further vandalism? 173.46.67.114 (talk) 00:24, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The edits aren't WP:VANDALISM, which has a narrow definition here on Wikipedia. Would you please self-revert as you just violated WP:3RR after being warned, I would prefer not to file an WP:ANEW report, thanks. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 00:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I guess I used the wrong term. Attempting to start an edit war? I tried multiple times to point the user to the Talk page to discuss, but they continued to harass and revert. 173.46.67.114 (talk) 00:33, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No one has harassed you. I was probably a bit more aggressive than I should have been with the reverts. We have a number of dispute resolution procedures that can be used as needed. In the meantime, I again urge you to self-revert; even if I don't file an ANEW someone else might and you will be blocked unless you self-revert. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 00:40, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:51, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.