Jump to content

Event of the mubahala

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Albertatiran (talk | contribs) at 08:20, 15 July 2023 (edited the lede to match the new title). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Part of a series on
Muhammad
Life
Career
Miracles
Views
Perspectives
Succession
Praise
Related
Part of a series on
Shia Islam
Beliefs and practices
Days of remembrance
History
Branches and sects
Ahl al-Kisa
Holy women
icon Shia Islam portal

The event of mubahala (Template:Lang-ar) with the Najrani Christians refers to an aborted attempt to resolve their theological dispute with Muslims circa 632 CE by invoking the curse of God upon the liars. The debates took place in Medina, located in the Arabian Peninsula, between a Christian delegation from Najran, a city in South Arabia, and the Islamic prophet Muhammad, who proposed this solution probably when their debates reached a deadlock concerning the nature of Jesus, human or divine.

The Christian delegation withdrew from the challenge and negotiated a peace treaty, either immediately, or when Muhammad arrived for the mubahala with his family, according to the majority of Islamic traditions. This episode has been linked to certain verses of the Quran, the central religious text of Islam, particularly verse 3:61. The event is particularly significant for Shia Muslims because Muhammad was accompanied to the mubahala by his daughter Fatima, her husband Ali, and their two sons, Hasan and Husayn, who are pivotal to Shia beliefs. At the time, this event must have raised their religious rank as the partners of Muhammad in his prophetic claims.

Etymology

The word mubahala (مُبَاهَلَة) is derived from the root verb bahala, which means 'to curse', while the noun al-bahl can mean either 'the curse' or a scarcity of water.[1] The word mubahala can also mean 'withdrawing mercy from one who lies or engages in falsehood'.[2] The act of mubahala (lit. 'mutual imprecation, curse') thus involves swearing a conditional curse, for instance, "May I be cursed if...," together with a purifying oath.[3] As a last resort, mubahala remains a lawful option to resolve disputes in Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh).[3]

Event

With the rise of Islam in the Arabian Peninsula,[4][5] the Islamic prophet Muhammad wrote to nearby personages around the year 9 AH (631–632 CE) and invited them to Islam.[6] One such letter was apparently addressed at the bishops of the southern city of Najran, which hosted a Christian community.[7] A delegation of Najrani Christians later arrived in Medina to meet with Muhammad in 8,[8] 9,[9][10] or 10 AH,[8][11][3] perhaps to ascertain his claims to prophethood.[12] In view of their weak ties with the Persian Empire, these and other Christians of the south were probably in a position to independently negotiate with Muhammad.[7] By one account, the delegation was led by Abd al-Masih, Abu al-Harith ibn Alqama, and Sayyid ibn al-Harith.[7][13] There a peace treaty was finally reached by which the Christians agreed to pay an annual poll-tax (jizya) but were not required to convert to Islam or partake in Muslims' military campaigns,[14] and remained in charge of for their own affairs.[10] This was perhaps the first such treaty in Muslim history,[4][10] but also resembled the treatment of Christians elsewhere by Muhammad.[15] It was not until the caliphate of Umar (r. 634–644) that the Christians of Najran were expelled from the Arabian Peninsula.[4]

Mubahala

In Medina, Muhammad and the Christian delegation may have also debated the nature of Jesus, human or divine, although the delegation ultimately rejected the Islamic belief that Jesus was human,[16] as represented by verse 3:59 of the Quran, which acknowledges the miraculous birth of Jesus but rejects the Christians' belief in his divinity, "Truly the likeness of Jesus in the sight of God is that of Adam; He created him from dust, then said to him, 'Be!' and he was."[17] Indeed, this and some other verses of the third chapter (sura), perhaps even its first seventy to eighty verses,[3] are said to have been revealed to Muhammad on this occasion.[18] Among these is verse 3:61, sometimes known as the verse of mubahala, which instructs Muhammad to challenge his opponents to mubahala,[19] perhaps when the debate had reached a deadlock.[20]

And to whomsoever disputes with thee over it, after the knowledge that has come unto thee, say, "Come! Let us call upon our sons and your sons, our women and your women, ourselves and yourselves. Then let us pray earnestly, so as to place the curse of God upon those who lie."[18]

The following verse 3:63, "And if they turn away, then God knows well the workers of corruption,"[10] has been interpreted as the subsequent rejection by the Christian delegation of tawhid, that is, the Islamic belief in the oneness of God.[21]

Participants

The Mubahala Mosque in Medina, present-day Saudi Arabia

By some reports, the delegation did not accept the challenge and instead negotiated a peace treaty with Muhammad, either because they thought possible that he was truthful in his claims,[22][3] or because they were intimidated by the military might of Muslims.[22][23] This is reported by the Sunni exegete Muqatil ibn Sulayman (d. 767),[24] and by the Sunni historian Ibn Sa'd (d. 845) in his Tabaqat.[13] In a tradition cited by Muqatil, Muhammad reflects hypothetically that he would have taken with him to the mubahala his daughter Fatima, her husband Ali, their two sons, namely, Hasan and Husayn, and two of his own wives, namely, Aisha and Hafsa, who were the daughters of the first two caliphs, namely, Abu Bakr and Umar, respectively.[24] Ibn Sa'd writes that two leaders of the delegation later returned to Medina and converted to Islam,[13] which might explain their earlier refusal of the mubahala.[25]

Yet according to other reports, Muhammad did appear for the occasion of mubahala, accompanied by his family, as instructed by the verse of mubahala,[22][26] apparently at the khatib ahmar (lit. 'red dune') in the Baqi' Cemetery, later renamed to jabal al-mubahala (lit. 'mountain of the mubahala').[3][27] Those who accompanied him are often identified as Ali, Fatima, Hasan and Husayn.[8][28][29] Such reports are given by the Shia-leaning historian Ibn Ishaq (d. 767) in his Sira, the Sunni exegete al-Razi (d. 1210) in his Tafsir,[8] the Sunni traditionist Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj (d. 875) in his canonical Sahih Muslim, the Sunni traditionist Hakim al-Nishapuri (d. 1014) in his al-Mustadrak,[30] and the Sunni exegete Ibn Kathir (d. 1373).[10] This indeed appears to be the majority view in exegetical works.[31] Here, the Islamicist Wilferd Madelung (d. 2023) argues that the term 'our sons' (abna'ana) in the verse of mubahala must refer to Muhammad's grandchildren, namely, Hasan and Husayn. In that case, he continues, it would be reasonable to include also in the event their parents, namely, Ali and Fatima.[16]

Ahl al-Kisa

Some traditions about the mubahala add that Muhammad, Ali, Fatima, Hasan, and Husayn stood under Muhammad's cloak, and the five have thus become known as the Ahl al-Kisa (lit. 'people of the cloak').[32][33][34] On the same occasion, Muhammad may have defined Ali, Fatima, Hasan, and Husayn as his ahl al-bayt (lit. 'people of the house'), according to Shia and some Sunni sources,[31] including the canonical collections Sahih Muslim, Sahih al-Tirmidhi,[35] and Musnad Ibn Hanbal.[36] Alternatively, some have suggested that these claims were possibly later additions.[36][3] At any rate, the inclusion of these four by Muhammad in the mubahala ritual, as his witnesses and guarantors,[37][38] must have raised their religious rank within the community.[16][39]

Significance in Shia Islam

Verse 3:61 of the Quran, also known as the verse of mubahala, inscribed in the shrine of Husayn in Karbala, located in Iraq

That Muhammad was accompanied to the mubahala by the above four is also the Shia view,[40] and Shia sources are unanimous that the term 'our sons' (abna'ana) in the verse of mubahala refers to Hasan and Husayn, the term 'our women' (nisa'ana) therein refers to Fatima, and that the term 'ourselves' (anfusana) is a reference to Ali.[41] By contrast, most reports presented by the Sunni exegete al-Tabari (d. 923) are silent about the matter, whereas some other Sunni authors agree with the Shia reports.[16][12][27]

The verse of mubahala is often cited by Shia scholars to support their claims concerning the prerogatives of the Ahl al-Kisa.[19][3] In particular, if the word 'ourselves' in the verse is a reference to Ali and Muhammad, as Shia authors argue, then the former naturally enjoys a similar authority as the latter.[42][23] Likewise, the Shia exegete Muhammad H. Tabatabai (d. 1981) contends that the participation of these four, to the exclusion of other Muslims, necessitates their partnership with Muhammad in his prophetic claims, for otherwise there could have been no negative consequence to their participation as the verse of mubahala targets only the liars.[43]

Eid of mubahala

Eid of mubahala (عِيْد ٱلْمُبَاهَلَة) is the Shia commemoration of the mubahala with the Najrani Christians, celebrated annually on 21,[3] or 24 Dhu al-Hijja of the Islamic calendar,[23] although the date in the Gregorian calendar varies from year to year because the former calendar is lunar and the latter is solar. The equivalent Gregorian date to 24 Dhu al-Hijja is shown below for a few years.[44]

Islamic year 1440 1441 1442 1443
Eid of mubahala 14 August 2020 3 August 2021 23 July 2022 12 July 2023[45]

See also

Footnotes

  1. ^ Berjak 2006, p. 419.
  2. ^ Massignon 1999.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i Schmucker 2012.
  4. ^ a b c Shahid.
  5. ^ Nickel 2006.
  6. ^ Momen 1985, p. 13.
  7. ^ a b c Watt 1956, p. 127.
  8. ^ a b c d Shah-Kazemi 2015.
  9. ^ Momen 1985, pp. 13–14.
  10. ^ a b c d e Nasr et al. 2015, p. 380.
  11. ^ Lalani 2000, p. 6.
  12. ^ a b Momen 1985, p. 14.
  13. ^ a b c Nickel 2006, p. 181.
  14. ^ Watt 1956, pp. 127–128.
  15. ^ Watt 1956, p. 126.
  16. ^ a b c d Madelung 1997, p. 16.
  17. ^ Nasr et al. 2015, pp. 378–379.
  18. ^ a b Nasr et al. 2015, p. 379.
  19. ^ a b Haider 2014, p. 35.
  20. ^ Osman 2015, p. 110.
  21. ^ Nickel 2006, p. 179.
  22. ^ a b c Nasr et al. 2015, pp. 379–380.
  23. ^ a b c Bill & Williams 2002, p. 29.
  24. ^ a b Nickel 2006, pp. 179–180.
  25. ^ al-Hasan 1977, p. 370.
  26. ^ Lammens 2012.
  27. ^ a b Bar-Asher & Kofsky 2002, p. 141.
  28. ^ Shah-Kazemi 2007, p. 61n18.
  29. ^ Daftary 2008.
  30. ^ Osman 2015, p. 140n42.
  31. ^ a b Haider 2014, p. 36.
  32. ^ Momen 1985, pp. 14, 16–7.
  33. ^ Algar 1974.
  34. ^ Tritton 2012.
  35. ^ Momen 1985, pp. 16, 325.
  36. ^ a b Soufi 1997, p. 11n36.
  37. ^ McAuliffe.
  38. ^ Fedele 2018, p. 56.
  39. ^ Lalani 2006, p. 29.
  40. ^ Thurlkill 2007, p. 20.
  41. ^ Mavani 2013, pp. 71–2.
  42. ^ Mavani 2013, p. 72.
  43. ^ Thurlkill 2007, p. 110.
  44. ^ "تبدیل تاریخ شمسی میلادی قمری". www.bahesab.ir (in Persian). Retrieved 14 June 2023.
  45. ^ "Islamic Calendar in Iran 1444, 2022-2023". IslamicCal.com. Retrieved 10 July 2023.

References

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Event_of_the_mubahala&oldid=1165455618"