Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Salvatore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Salvatore

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not satisfy WP:GNG. Both sources are not independent, failing WP:IS. One is just social media, and the other are clearly PR Newswire.

I didn't think being in Marquis Who’s Who is an automatic sign that he is notable, more references are required to establish notability. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Businesspeople, United States of America, and Arizona. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Can't find SIGCOV. And yes, Marquis Who's Who is unreliable and can't be used to establish notability, much less solitary articles about getting into Marquis Who's Who. 〜 Festucalex • talk 07:29, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing in the article is adequately sourced. Nothing in the article confers automatic notability. For accomplishments of this nature, we need GNG-level in-depth reliable independent sourcing and we do not have it. Certainly Marquis doesn't count as reliable. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:16, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Both sources in the articles are bad (LinkdIn and a press release) and I didn't find any good. Deckkohl (talk) 13:56, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:35, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.