Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amina Kaddur
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Bruce1ee (talk | contribs) at 00:09, 25 July 2023 (fixed lint errors – misnested tags). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 00:09, 25 July 2023 by Bruce1ee (talk | contribs) (fixed lint errors – misnested tags)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Mark Arsten (talk) 00:25, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Amina Kaddur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 18:32, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:ENT: minor model. Per FMD, her career consists of two magazine covers, and the depth of coverage amounts to one sentence in Vogue and her name being mentioned in Araba.com, clearly falling short of the significant coverage guideline. Mbinebri talk ← 12:41, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of notability in the modelling industry. --Artene50 (talk) 04:56, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:13, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 19:48, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.