Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anatomy

WikiProject Anatomy Talk Page
Main page	Discussion	Things To Do	Tools	Article alerts	Manual of Style	Resources

Shortcut

WT:ANAT

WikiProject Anatomy was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 3 September 2014.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Requested move at Talk:Muscle tissue#Requested move 19 April 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Muscle tissue#Requested move 19 April 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – Material Works 21:01, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Kidney#Requested move 3 July 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Kidney#Requested move 3 July 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 21:34, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bad photos

I and @Claes Lindhardt have been working on the List of skeletal muscles of the human body and it has become clear that several of the muscles have "reused" images or are just scans of Gray's Anatomy 20th edition that do not really explain what the muscle is. For example, just for the head muscles:

Orbicularis oculi muscle - does not show parts
Depressor supercilii muscle - just reuses obicularis oculi image
Temporoparietalis muscle - image but muscle is not even labeled
Levator labii superioris alaeque nasi muscle - labelled under a different name and the arrow is not even pointing at the right muscle
Transverse muscle of the chin - identical pictures to Depressor anguli oris muscle
Thyroarytenoid muscle - doesn't label parts

I'm not really an illustrator, so what is the best way to go about fixing these? Mathnerd314159 (talk) 15:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articularis genus muscle - ist a picture of a bone with the muscle attachment rather then the muscle itself

Claes Lindhardt (talk) 21:54, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalene_muscles - have all the scalenus muscles except the minimus Claes Lindhardt (talk) 19:07, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interspinales_muscles have no picture yet Claes Lindhardt (talk) 21:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subcostalis_muscle also do not have a picture yet Claes Lindhardt (talk) 21:29, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coccygeus_muscle , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levator_ani also seems to be using the same primary pictures. There is a lot of articles using the same picture where both muscles are likely visable but not marked. This might not be a major issue, but it would be very neat to also have resolved. Claes Lindhardt (talk) 21:55, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

puboperinealis, pterygoideus proprius, Muscle of terminal notch, ceratocricoideus and puboprostaticus (males) / pubovaginalis (females) are also still missing pictures Claes Lindhardt (talk) 22:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triceps and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Articularis_cubiti_muscle Claes Lindhardt (talk) 12:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Guideline on Multiple muslces in one article

Sometimes there is a lot of muscles covered in one article and sometimes each muscle get thier article, would it make sense to make a kind of guideline on when what makes sense? Claes Lindhardt (talk) 20:50, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]