User talk:Cramyourspam

A (not very good(dark choc FTW!!)) for you!

just wanted to give you a cookie and ackowlegement for being an editor! 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 19:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Sally Mann 2.jpg

The file File:Sally Mann 2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, unnecessary crop of File:SallyMann.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:23, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 23:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Solomons maryland bronze sculpture on watch navy training center.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Solomons maryland bronze sculpture on watch navy training center.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Ирука¹³ 02:16, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1) it's public art in a public park.

2) the problematic bit is less than 30% of the overall image, so it's fine under US copyright law

please undo your takedown action

Cramyourspam (talk) 06:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1. Agree.

2. Disagree. — Ирука¹³ 07:03, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

US copyright law allows for derivative images if the original is less than 30%. it's a US site and US artist.

i'll add:

3. educational/journalistic/documentary fair use

Cramyourspam (talk) 07:48, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]