User talk:Aksi great
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
Capt. Sunil Khokhar
Regarding my edits, the fact remains that notability was not claimed at all in any way in the article in queston for Capt. Sunil Khokhar. If someone were to simply write two sentences and say they received the Congressional Medal of Honor I would react the same way. Both are proud achievements, but notability requires more than hearsay: "A topic is notable if it has been the subject of at least one substantial or multiple, non-trivial published works from sources that are reliable and independent of the subject and of each other." --BaseballDetective 12:23, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- You are simply wrong. Even following your links to WP:BIO it clearly states "The following criteria make it likely that sufficient reliable information is available about a given person. People who satisfy at least one of these criteria may merit their own Wikipedia articles, as there is likely to be a good deal of verifiable information available about them and a good deal of public interest in them." It does not say that it should be done in absence, but it in fact states that outside verifiability should be EASIER if someone falls in such catategory because there would be pubically accessible records. In this case there is (1) a link to a dead page and (2) a link to a bodybuilding competion in the name of the person. Nowhere near notable or verifiable. --BaseballDetective 12:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Again, the links that were removed were not arbitrary at all. In this case there is (1) a link to a dead page and (2) a link to a bodybuilding competion in the name of the person. Nowhere near notable or verifiable. But do I enjoy reading each excuse you're making for what is simply a poorly put together article that has no notability cliams whatsoever. --BaseballDetective 12:39, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Hkelkar
Hi Akash - pls see this. I was gonna file for checkuser, but thought I'd let you check this out first. Rama's arrow 12:54, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
re:RFCU
Everything's archived now.--Ed ¿Cómo estás? 01:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Look Who is Back: User:Kapilshastri
The same user who has been warned and banned is now attempted to assert himself on Wiki again and again and again. [1] --07:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by BaseballDetective (talk • contribs).
Help
If there has been vandalism, do I just revert it or what? Thanks—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Teh roflmaoer (talk • contribs).
Mega cities
Hi! Thanks for the budget reference. It will be needed to prove that there are 7 megacities. We need some improvement of Hyderabad now. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:24, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Help (again)
If there has been a user who has been vandalising, but he does not have an account, how do I warn him? Teh roflmaoer 21:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Fear the Fire
Please go through this section [2]. It is regarding my block. You have really made a mistake.. and if it is intentional, I will have to take help from some other admin..
You have listed User:70.113.116.46 and User:70.113.94.221 as Sockpuppets of User:Sundaram7 where as I have clearly proved that they are sockpuppets of banned User:Hkelkar. But now they are removed... Who removed those?? If it was you, why dint you take any action on my account too..???? Please see point (3) on my arguments, if it is not convincing for you, I will try to give more proofs.. Please tell me on what basis did you establish me as a sockpuppet of User:Sundaram7 --- 59.160.207.14 06:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Can you block this guy for sockpuppetry as well. Thanks. --KZ Talk • Vandal • Contrib 07:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 12 | 20 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| WikiWorld comic: "Wilhelm Scream" | News and notes: Bad sin, milestones |
| Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Careful.
Pl. be careful about exercising editor's administrator's rights. I am reverting vandals. Followers of Pandurang Shashtri want to kill old deciples and yet glorify Pandurang Shashtri & Swadhyay Parivar. I think, you are from Ahmedabad and should know this.
swadhyayee 17:35, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Yes, Wikipedia policy can be interpreted anyway. When Hemendra and others remove contents, you don't find it content dispute and have no objection. Check what is the contribution of Hemendra as an editor? Has been here only to remove facts about Swadhyay Parivar. Be fair and honest Aksi, pl. don't be carried away in haste. swadhyayee 01:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Deshgujarat
અક્કીભાઈ અમે મહેનત કરીને કામ કરી રહ્યા છીએ ત્યારે આપ શ્રી કેમ દેશ્ગુજરાતની લીંક કાઢી નાંખી રહ્યા છો ?
અમારું કન્ટેન્ટ ઓરીજીનલ છે
કંટેંટ સાઈટ પર અવાઈલેબલ છે
કોઈનું નુકસાન કરતા નથી
કશું કમાતા નથી
ઉલટાનો પોતાનો ટાઈમ આપીએ છીએ ગુજરાતની નેટ પર પ્રેઝન્સ માટે
આવામાં વિકિપેડીયા પર આપ ગુજરાતી થઈને અમને મદદ કરો એવી આશા તો રાખીએ જ છીયે પણ ભઈ અમારી ઢગલાબંધ લીંકો રીમૂવ કરીને અમારી મહેનત પર શૂં કરવા પાણી ફેરવો છો? અમારો કેટલો ટાઈમ જાય છે લીંક રીસ્ટોર કરતા ?કમસેકમ આ તો બંધ કરો ?
અમે દોડાદોડ કરીને જે કંન્ટેન્ટ ભેગુ કરીએ છીએ એની પાછળની મહેનત વિશે જરા વિચારી જુઓ. અને એમાં તમને કશું ખોટું લાગતું હોય તો કહો, અમે તો હંમેશ એ સાંભળવા માટે આતુર હોઈએ છીએ.
તમને ખબર છે વીકીપીડીયાની દેશગુજરાતની લીંક દ્વારા ગુજરાતનો વિકાસ જોઈને ગુજરાતમાં કેટલું બધું નવું કામ કરવાની લોકોને પ્રેરણા મળી છે ?
ક્રુપયા હવે લીંક ડીલીટ કરવામાં નહીં પરંતુ આપની વગ અને આવડત દ્વારા ગુજરાતના હિતના આ કામમાં મદદ કરવાની રાખો ભાઈ એવી વિનંતી.
જય ગુજરાત જપન પાઠક
japanpathak@yahoo.com japanpathak@gmail.com—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.96.144.149 (talk • contribs).
- (Translating the message for others to read. It is in Gujarati - Aksi_great (talk) 13:48, 22 March 2007 (UTC)) - Brother Aksi, we are working hard, why are you removing links to deshgujarat.com? Our content is original, our content is available on the site, we aren't harming anyone and are not earning anything from it. We are spending our own time to increase the presence of Gujarat on the net. You are a Gujarati on wikipedia and we expected some help from you. But why did you remove numerous links and destroy our hard work? A large amount of time goes in restoring the links. At least stop removing them. We work hard to gather content. At least appreciate the hard work that goes behind it. If you have felt wronged, then please tell us. We are always eager to help. Do you know that by seeing the deshgujarat links on wikipedia, people will appreciate the growth of Gujarat and be inspired to do new work? We request you to stop deleting the links and help us in this work using your knowledge and experience. Victory to Gujarat. Japan Pathak.
Akasi, I feel you to be un-reasonable.
Akasi, I think you are un-reasonable. Who removed the contents and links from Swadhyay Parivar? What's wrong in my writing on your talk page about vandal in response to your notice? Does Hemedra get merit for not approaching you on your talk page? What's your answer to Hemendra's contribution except removal of weblinks from Swadhyay Parivar? Do you call it regular editing and edit-war?
swadhyayee 14:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
I am not seeing sense when you can't make out difference. swadhyayee 14:15, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Is it applicable to me only?
Is it applicable to me only? Have you noticed, Hemendra removed web-links? I think you have some problem with some people and you would abuse your admin powers and influence. swadhyayee 14:47, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Did you notice since when these web-links existed on article page? Check, they are not incorporated by me. Hope you will be fair. swadhyayee 14:48, 22 March 2007 (UTC)