Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements/PTG/state-of-matter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Gonnym (talk | contribs) at 19:12, 15 August 2023 (-deleted). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
PTG (talk)
Periodic Table Graphics
Themes
(the sciences)
WT:ELEM
Graphics
(the presentations)
Blocks
(BLOCK) (talk)
Micro-PT
(MICRO) (talk)
See also this parallel talk
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elements § Emergency edit: remove fontcoloring State-of-Matter
Current version (~2020)
Developing
    • Set: "2021-som1" (edit)
    • Theme=000000
    • Set-page=000000
    • Set-tests=[[2021-som1/tests]]
    • Status=dev
    • Descr=solve wl-blue contrast issue
    • dob=2021-01-23

State of Matter theme

[edit]
  • In this theme, as a science, there is discussion on SoM should be noted as "of the real world material" (like O2, diamnd/graphite C), or plasma-phase (more physical) property. WT:ELEM.

Emergency edit: fontcolors into black (2021-01-23)

[edit]
See also this parallel talk: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elements § Emergency edit: remove fontcoloring State-of-Matter

Details (2021-01-23)

These two edits did it:
[1] ({{Element_color}})
[2] {{Periodic table legend/State of matter}}
Mainspace articles affected:

2020

[edit]

Color set

[edit]
By font color
  • A  solid → #000000 
  • A  liquid → #000000 
  • A  gas → #000000 
  • A  unknown phase → #000000 
Wikilink blue
  • A  wikilink → #0645ad 
  • A  wikilink visited → #0B0080 Note: wikilink, visited
Legend=empty by Emergency edit.

Contrast

[edit]
sort name bg font ratio conf
w3c
lum
[0–1]
Hue
[0–360]
HSL
Sat
[0–1]
HSL
Lum
[0–1]
HSV
Sat
[0–1]
HSV
Val
[0–1]
RGB dec
[0–255]
note
61 s-block #ff9999 #000000 10.27
AAA
0.46 0 1 0.8 0.4 1 255-153-153 AlkMetal
61 s-block #ff9999 #cb0000 2.9
none
H, He
61 s-block #ff9999 #646464 2.89
none
Unk
61 s-block #ff9999 #0645ad 4.17
none
wl
62 p-block #fdff8c #000000 19.86
AAA
0.94 61 1 0.775 0.451 1 253-255-140 solid
62 p-block #fdff8c #007000 5.99
AA
Br
62 p-block #fdff8c #cb0000 5.61
AA
N, O, F etc.
62 p-block #fdff8c #646464 5.6
AA
Unk
62 p-block #fdff8c #0645ad 8.06
AAA
wl
63 d-block #99ccff #000000 12.44
AAA
0.57 210 1 0.8 0.4 1 153-204-255 solid
63 d-block #99ccff #007000 3.75
none
Hg
63 d-block #99ccff #646464 3.5
none
Unk
63 d-block #99ccff #0645ad 5.05
AA
wl
64 f-block #9bff99 #000000 17.16
AAA
0.81 118.8 1 0.8 0.4 1 155-255-153 solid
64 f-block #9bff99 #646464 4.83
AA
Unk
64 f-block #9bff99 #0645ad 6.97
AA
wl
65 g-block #fd99ff #646464 3.15
none
0.51 298.8 1 0.8 0.4 1 253-153-255 UNK all in g-block
65 g-block #fd99ff #0645ad 4.54
AA
wl

Combinations not present

[edit]
sort name bg font ratio conf
w3c
lum
[0–1]
Hue
[0–360]
HSL
Sat
[0–1]
HSL
Lum
[0–1]
HSV
Sat
[0–1]
HSV
Val
[0–1]
RGB dec
[0–255]
note
61 s-block #ff9999 #007000 3.1
none
----
63 d-block #99ccff #cb0000 3.51
none
----
64 f-block #9bff99 #007000 5.17
AA
----
64 f-block #9bff99 #cb0000 4.85
AA
----
65 g-block #fd99ff #000000 11.18
AAA
----
65 g-block #fd99ff #007000 3.37
none
----
65 g-block #fd99ff #cb0000 3.16
none
----

Blind PT

[edit]
𨧀

"xxxline-height:1em;"

2021-som1

[edit]
(lol name/id: has nothing to do with SoM because we don't want to go back to (SoM)-fontcolors). -DePiep (talk) 01:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SOM-icons

[edit]
April 5, 2021
Group 1 2   3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Hydrogen &
alkali metals
Alkaline earth metals Pnicto­gens Chal­co­gens Halo­gens Noble
gases
Period

hydro­genH1 he­liumHe2
lith­iumLi3 beryl­liumBe4 boronB5 carbonC6 nitro­genN7 oxy­genO8 fluor­ineF9 neonNe10
so­diumNa11 magne­siumMg12 alumin­iumAl13 sili­conSi14 phos­phorusP15 sulfurS16 chlor­ineCl17 argonAr18
potas­siumK19 cal­ciumCa20 scan­diumSc21 tita­niumTi22 vana­diumV23 chrom­iumCr24 manga­neseMn25 ironFe26 cobaltCo27 nickelNi28 copperCu29 zincZn30 galliumGa31 germa­niumGe32 arsenicAs33 sele­niumSe34 bromineBr35 kryp­tonKr36
rubid­iumRb37 stront­iumSr38 yttriumY39 zirco­niumZr40 nio­biumNb41 molyb­denumMo42 tech­netiumTc43 ruthe­niumRu44 rho­diumRh45 pallad­iumPd46 silverAg47 cad­miumCd48 indiumIn49 tinSn50 anti­monySb51 tellur­iumTe52 iodineI53 xenonXe54
cae­siumCs55 ba­riumBa56 1 asterisk lute­tiumLu71 haf­niumHf72 tanta­lumTa73 tung­stenW74 rhe­niumRe75 os­miumOs76 iridiumIr77 plat­inumPt78 goldAu79 mer­curyHg80 thalliumTl81 leadPb82 bis­muthBi83 polo­niumPo84 asta­tineAt85 radonRn86
fran­ciumFr87 ra­diumRa88 1 asterisk lawren­ciumLr103 ruther­fordiumRf104 dub­niumDb105 sea­borgiumSg106 bohr­iumBh107 has­siumHs108 meit­neriumMt109 darm­stadtiumDs110 roent­geniumRg111 coper­niciumCn112 nihon­iumNh113 flerov­iumFl114 moscov­iumMc115 liver­moriumLv116 tenness­ineTs117 oga­nessonOg118
1 asterisk lan­thanumLa57 ceriumCe58 praseo­dymiumPr59 neo­dymiumNd60 prome­thiumPm61 sama­riumSm62 europ­iumEu63 gadolin­iumGd64 ter­biumTb65 dyspro­siumDy66 hol­miumHo67 erbiumEr68 thuliumTm69 ytter­biumYb70  
1 asterisk actin­iumAc89 thor­iumTh90 protac­tiniumPa91 ura­niumU92 neptu­niumNp93 pluto­niumPu94 ameri­ciumAm95 curiumCm96 berkel­iumBk97 califor­niumCf98 einstei­niumEs99 fer­miumFm100 mende­leviumMd101 nobel­iumNo102
Legend: State of matter
Gas
Liquid
Solid
Phase unknown

Icons & templates

[edit]
Icon to indicate gaseous phase, b/w
Icon to indicate liquid phase, b/w
Icon to indicate solid phase, b/w
Icon placeholder, b/w
DePiep (talk) 22:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
{{Element cell-named/som-image}} -- cell

Icons background

[edit]

Icon images development

[edit]

These sets of icons are mentioned:

  • LP03, 2021-01-18 [3]
Solid: A black cube, like
Liquid: A black teardrop, like
Gas: A black cloud, like
Unknown phase: A black question mark, like
  • YBG, 2021-01-25 [4]
- a cloud for gasses
- a drop for liquids
- a cube for solids
  • DePiep, 2021-01-27
Icon to indicate gaseous phase, b/w
Icon to indicate liquid phase, b/w
Icon to indicate solid phase, b/w
DePiep (talk) 22:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • DePiep, Unicode characters
  • U+1F4A7 💧 DROPLET
  • U+1F322 🌢 BLACK DROPLET
  • U+286A BRAILLE PATTERN DOTS-2467
Responses & commentary
Worth thinking about: Plasma (physics) phase? -DePiep (talk) 22:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No. -DePiep (talk) 22:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Plasma is not needed in a PT context, though if there were any chance the icon set would be used in contexts broader that the PT, it would be a plus to have a coherent set of four. But not sufficiently a plus that it should derail progress.
Any of these would work for me. DePiep's has the interesting characteristic that when presented as shown above they look like a candle with a flame and smoke. YBG (talk) 07:40, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OK, won't create a plasm one then (Double sharp also note this at WT:ELEM). Will work on a PT-implementation. As I mentioned before, for recognisability when font-size small, I prefer the simple 2D ones. And yes, a candle :-) BTW, I think the gas-dots are not randomly enough, can't help thinking about domino tiles ;-) -DePiep (talk) 12:06, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think there might be some benefit to having 3-D effects visible at larger sizes provided they automagically disappear into invisibility at smaller sizes.
As to making the dots more random, consider these possibilities (1) remove the 2nd-from-bottom dot on the left; (2) make some of the dots a different size or different shape.
YBG (talk) 06:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
re "3D when in larger sizes" -- in which situation would this help? 2D-to-3D (icon-to-image!) does not make its legend superfluous (iow image still needs clarification). And when these are in here, there are about 5–9 data facts per cell. So imo no need for extra details. We surely should see a full PT mockup first (also, because I think that supports my points ;-) ). Working on this. -DePiep (talk) 22:20, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, my favourite is LP03's, but I'd be fine with any. Double sharp (talk) 08:00, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Se my reply to YBG above. -DePiep (talk) 22:20, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The more I think about it - and now especially that I've seen your example - the more I think that the 3D effect is helpful. These black rectangles look to me like so many scraps of carbon paper. YBG (talk) 06:30, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Double sharp (talk) 07:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
−1 We have to show 118 statuses, and showing a pattern with it. So better use icons/symbols, not images.
As with background colors, to do so icons or symbols can do this; a picture does not help at all. The profit is: once you know the mental-easy meaning of a well-chosen symbol, only once, one cannot unknow it and one will recognise it easily by looking not by 'interpreting'. Best illustration for this: A-B-C-... Would you be helpd reading a book or paper when the alphabet was 3D? Images? Above this, the cell has much more info (esp. text and numbers), which makes it hartder to distinguish details (like, giving meaning to serif/non-serif font distinction). All in all, the question here is presenting information, not eh documenting it. -DePiep (talk) 18:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Issues

[edit]

Information

[edit]

Now the result for Fl (predicted liquid) seems to be formally published: [5]. So if one wanted, one could definitely write a cited predicted state for the transactinoids too: all solid, except Cn and Fl liquids. (It may be useful in some cases even if we eventually decide not to do it for the main PT.) Double sharp (talk) 09:17, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]