User talk:Mellow775

The pro-Russian editors of Wikipedia entered into a conspiracy, they had no right to block me, because there was no malicious intent in my actions. I was guided by the book recommended by the Ministry of Education of Ukraine, which is a scientific guide for students of higher educational institutions. The conspiracy of pro-Russian administrators blocked me, and not some other reason. Wikipedia allows you to have two accounts as long as they are not vandalistic.

It was a conspiracy by Wikipedia editors. You are breaking the rules of wikipedia, because there was no evil in my actions!

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Liliylo per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Liliylo. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Courcelles (talk) 21:41, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mellow775 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

An attack by editors in a conspiracy. They blocked my account, violating wikipedia's rules, since I did nothing illegal. I was blocked because it was impossible to write about the Ukrainian language from Ukrainian sources. Please do your research. Mellow775 (talk) 18:42, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool indicates you share an IP address with Liliylo (talk · contribs). In this context, the block is legitimate. PhilKnight (talk) 19:02, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

==

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Mellow775 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Your reason here |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

==

1. I cannot have exactly the same address as another user. I wrote about my friend who first started these editorials, but it's not me. 2. Do you consider her actions malicious editing? Editing about the Ukrainian language from Ukrainian books - malicious intent? Don't deceive me! I know the rules! You had no right to block me! Why was I blocked? My Internet friend was not blocked and was not warned that these corrections cannot be made from the Ukrainian book. You have no right to act like that. It was a conspiracy by Wikipedia editors to remove a person who kills Russian myths. You are breaking the rules of wikipedia, because there was no evil in my actions! Mellow775 (talk) 19:42, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]