User talk:Taavi
This is Taavi's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
This user prefers to be notified by Notifications. Please use {{ping}} or {{reply to}} when you reply to this user. No talkback messages are needed. Please keep conversations in one place. |
Courtesy note regarding changes to EFFP template
There is currently a discussion at Template talk:EFFP regarding changes to a template that is used by your bot. Thank you.. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Bot down?
Not sure if you were already told or noticed, but MajavahBot appears to be unresponsive. It has not been archiving or commenting on any WP:EF/FP/R report since around ~19 hours ago (15:29, 11 July 2023 UTC), although it did edit its Bot status report page 2 hours later. – 2804:F14:8087:2401:A9B4:1D32:7E56:C04B (talk) 10:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- Seems your change fixed it: diff:1165000895. 👍 – 2804:F14:8087:2401:A9B4:1D32:7E56:C04B (talk) 10:52, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- Indeed. Quite ironically it was broken because I was working on adding checks that would catch these kinds of programming errors automatically in the future. Taavi (talk!) 10:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- I can't claim that is not relatable 😅. – 2804:F14:8087:2401:A9B4:1D32:7E56:C04B (talk) 11:02, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- Indeed. Quite ironically it was broken because I was working on adding checks that would catch these kinds of programming errors automatically in the future. Taavi (talk!) 10:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
MajavahBot 5 approved
Hello Tavvi! Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MajavahBot 5 has been approved. Happy editing! TheSandDoctor Talk 16:04, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Interesting Edit on TrueNAS
For some reason the version table was removed from this page. It was cited as not idependently sourced but it was sourced directly from their documentation.
In the case of this being a conflict, who would be best to source this information? A different site that is forwarded a list of version changes from iX themselves rather than directly the documentation that iXsystems puts together?
I am at a loss here on how this is considered "not based on independent sources"? Is the official documentation not considered a source of truth?|
Furthermore, how is the version release that lists fixing bugs that prevents users from using certain elements considered "promotional"? Wsoteros (talk) 19:38, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, Wsoteros. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information: we cover topics that reliable, independent (not: the company itself) sources cover, so I removed the changelog section as it was only sourced to the TrueNAS site itself. If you look at macOS Sonoma for example, you can see that it's mostly sourced to various tech publications and not Apple itself, so including that level of detail about that version is fine. If iXsystems wants to publish the full changelog somewhere they can do it on their own website for example. Taavi (talk!) 11:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the reply and my apologies for the frustration.
- We will stick to those guidelines for future edits. Wsoteros (talk) 14:08, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Poke
Module talk:ATP rankings § RUS and BUL. Just in case you missed the ping :-) Primefac (talk) 06:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)