Jump to content

Talk:Demonic Males

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Johnsoniensis (talk | contribs) at 11:16, 16 September 2023 (gend). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBooks Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconGender studies Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 January 2021 and 19 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Anthro Lover. Peer reviewers: Leilakinson, Jessemerodio, Venturca.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The titre...

It sounds so... Mysandric. Is the book biased? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.176.80.65 (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The book is in no way misandric (not mysandric) and not biased at all. It is, in fact, the first book on human aggression which is free of ideology and sticks to empirical facts. It illustrates the role male aggression plays in our history and society, but does not fail to mention increasing female violence, especially among teenagers. In an - unfortunately - short passage the role of women in the evolution of male aggressivity is mentioned: the sexual selection by women of aggressive mating partners has produced the dominant expansive male who has shaped human history from Alexander the Great via Caesar, Genghis Khan, Napoleon, to Mussolini, Stalin, Hitler and Mao. Regrettably this book has not been met with the attention it deserves. Ontologix (talk) 04:43, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]