User talk:Surtsicna

m²

Hello, Surtsicna, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 17:03, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox peerage title

Template:Infobox peerage title has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox family. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.

"Matilda of Wales" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Matilda of Wales has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 7 § Matilda of Wales until a consensus is reached. estar8806 (talk) ★ 14:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Duchess of Gloucester

Hello, Surtsicna,

Thank you for creating Duchess of Gloucester.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for the article. Please consider adding citations to the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lightburst (talk) 01:55, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Phallichthys tico

Hello! Your submission of Phallichthys tico at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yakikaki (talk) 15:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Justices of the High Court of Australia

Hi Surtsicna, I've got another ongoing move discussion that's encountered some resistance. Would love to read your input on it. Cheers! Woko Sapien (talk) 14:03, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Phallichthys

On 7 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Phallichthys, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Phallichthys (literally 'penis fish') species are so called because the males (example pictured) have "comparatively huge" sex appendages? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Phallichthys. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Phallichthys), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ...

... for helping me keep an eye on Swenglish, such as "the Crown Princely couple". It's quite a task. Sincerely, SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:29, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing, SergeWoodzing. I am impressed by, and grateful for, the considerable expansion of that article. Correcting a bit of Swenglish is a small price to pay for such an effort. Surtsicna (talk) 17:50, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. She certainly deserves a good article, or her legacy does, as popular and appreciated as she was. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:56, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tvrtko

Hello!

About your recent edit on Tvrtko I - isn't he the first of 3 sons, making him the eldest, not the elder? 93.87.123.180 (talk) 14:07, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I see that you may have counted Dabiša or Ostoja, but the sentence is about the sons of Vladislav and Jelena. If Dabiša and/or Ostoja were Tvrtko I's half-brothers, they were certainly not the sons of Jelena. Surtsicna (talk) 17:48, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thank you for the clarification. 93.87.123.180 (talk) 19:15, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Phallichthys amates

On 9 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Phallichthys amates, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that merry widows like soft bottoms? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Phallichthys amates. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Phallichthys amates), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 12:03, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Poecilia catemaconis

Hello! Your submission of Poecilia catemaconis at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Panamitsu (talk) ^{Please ping on reply} 05:39, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Poecilia gillii

On 11 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Poecilia gillii, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that small Poecilia gillii males have longer sex organs than larger males, to facilitate mating with females that flee from them? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Poecilia gillii. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Poecilia gillii), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Love your quirky DYK hooks! I wish I had the creativity to make some actually decent hooks myself.... #prodraxis ^connect 15:26, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Prodraxis! That is so kind. Sometimes I get inspired and I appreciate the love! Surtsicna (talk) 16:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Phallichthys tico

On 12 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Phallichthys tico, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the dwarf merry widow is not very brave? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Phallichthys tico. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Phallichthys tico), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 16:57, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Poecilia chica

On 13 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Poecilia chica, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that dwarf mollies hit rock bottom when they grow up? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Poecilia chica. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Poecilia chica), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 12:35, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy/Tribute in biographies

Hello. I've seen you've deleted sourced and well referenced Tribute/Legacy Headings on Lalla Latifa & Lalla Salma's pages.

Legacy/Tribute is part of a biography for a wikipedia project. E.g.: Augustus, Saladin, Henrietta Maria of France, Napoleon III. Augustus has paragraphs of his Tribute/Legacy Heading detailing the month of August as tribute to his person. And not everyone as a religious worship place as tribute, it is a huge part of one's legacy/tribute to have a mosque named in one's honor. --~~~ AvaBrandon2000 (talk) 19:43, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Princess Anna of Saxony (1903–1976)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Princess Anna of Saxony (1903–1976). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.