Talk:2023 Brazilian Congress attack
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2023 Brazilian Congress attack article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
The contents of the Federal intervention in the Distrito Federal in 2023 page were merged into 2023 Brazilian Congress attack on 9 January 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
A news item involving 2023 Brazilian Congress attack was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 8 January 2023. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of 2023 Brazilian Congress attack was copied or moved into Reactions to the 2023 Brazilian Congress attack with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
Discrepancy Detected
As recent leaks show, there was involvememt from the GSI in regards to the 8th, as one of the high ranks from GSI, Gonçalves Dias was handing water and opening doors to "pro-bolsonaro" protesters inside the building. Not to mention, he made the whole GSI (an army branch) retreat BEFORE the whole chaos abrupted.
Flavio Dino KNEW about the attacks before they started, and did nothing to atleast inform of the threat.
There's a CPI (an investigation) planned to be voted, and for the most part PT who seemed to support it at first decided to back off and go against it, strange am I right? 177.124.122.220 (talk) 16:12, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Discrepancy 2; The whole attack wasn't incentivised by Bolsonaro, but instead from other parties. 177.124.122.220 (talk) 16:13, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Bolsonaro completely involved
see https://www.cnn.com/cnn/2023/01/13/americas/brazil-federal-police-election-result-bolsonaro-intl-hnk/index.html Elinruby (talk) 02:13, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Invasion
I suspect invasion is a too-direct translation of a Portuguese word. Doesn't seem like the right word here. Usually countries invade other countries, mobs don't invade buildings. Should probably change to "attack", since that is what the article is called. –Novem Linguae (talk) 22:46, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Novem Linguae Perhaps, the right word here would be "storming". Perhaps, something like "2023 storming of Brazilian Congress" or "2023 Brazilian Congress storming". Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 23:38, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- Sure, I'd be fine with that. –Novem Linguae (talk) 01:01, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Novem Linguae Sorry the delay to answer you. Should we move the article? Which do you prefer? "2023 storming of Brazilian Congress" or "2023 Brazilian Congress storming"? Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 15:38, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- It can stay at its current title if you want. Other storming articles also use "attack", such as January 6 United States Capitol attack. My main concern is changing "invasion" to something else such as "storming". Hope that makes sense. –Novem Linguae (talk) 15:51, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Novem Linguae So, pretty much, only changing "invasion" to "storming" wherever it appears in the text? Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 00:03, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- It can stay at its current title if you want. Other storming articles also use "attack", such as January 6 United States Capitol attack. My main concern is changing "invasion" to something else such as "storming". Hope that makes sense. –Novem Linguae (talk) 15:51, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Novem Linguae Sorry the delay to answer you. Should we move the article? Which do you prefer? "2023 storming of Brazilian Congress" or "2023 Brazilian Congress storming"? Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 15:38, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- Sure, I'd be fine with that. –Novem Linguae (talk) 01:01, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class Brazil articles
- High-importance Brazil articles
- B-Class history of Brazil articles
- High-importance history of Brazil articles
- History of Brazil task force articles
- WikiProject Brazil articles
- B-Class Crime-related articles
- Low-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- B-Class Law enforcement articles
- Low-importance Law enforcement articles
- WikiProject Law Enforcement articles
- B-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- B-Class sociology articles
- Low-importance sociology articles
- B-Class social movements task force articles
- Social movements task force articles