User talk:Keneris
Вандалізм 213.174.20.251
Доброго дня перегляньте внесок IP-адреси 213.174.20.251 вандалить статті про українські прошу скасувати увесь внесок та запитуйте до адміністраторів до блокування IP-адреси на 1 рік. Олег Гарбуз 2008 (talk) 14:58, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Note: I have reverted these edits which were made by an editor named 213.174.20.251 (see: Спеціальна:Мобільна різниця версій/39487715 and Спеціальна:Мобільна різниця версій/39487713) ☀DefenderTienMinh☽ (talk) 15:10, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Вандалізм 176.105.165.8
Доброго дня IP-адреса 176.105.165.8 знову вандалить статті про українські телеканали змінює назви прошу запитати до адміністраторів та заблокувати IP-адресу на термін 1 рік та скасувати увесь внесок!!! Олег Гарбуз 2008 (talk) 12:48, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
June 2023
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Vachirawit Chivaaree, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 15:01, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- By "unsourced or poorly sourced" do you mean grading sources of information? By Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources I was able to find out that The Diplomat is a good source. In this source, from the third paragraph begins the very thing that was entered into the article. Foreing Policy, which is not in the list of these sources, says the same thing. Next comes CNN, also recorded as a reliable source. Then there are the really non-scored sources, but they have this information in them. I'm from Ukrainian Wikipedia, we don't have a procedure for grading sources, so please explain it to me. Where am I wrong? Keneris (talk) 16:28, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- Well, there's also Twitter, and dzrhnews, whatever that is--but there are more problems; I picked one of the templates. For some reason you removed the short description and placed a web citation template in there. Then, the entire article is loaded with trivial celeb stuff, it suffers from promotional editing, and your whole thing is basically about a tweet. Plus, "Controversies" (or "Scandals") sections are discouraged. Put all that together and you have, in my opinion and that of others, something that doesn't improve the article. Does that make sense? Drmies (talk) 02:37, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Actually, the short description was removed by me due to a technical error, I apologize for that. Twitter is indeed an unreliable source, but CNN comes next, which is already a reliable source. Still, if it all comes to the Tweet that CNN wrote about, it might be relevant. Also, please clarify which rule/discussion does not recommend sections of "Controversy". In Ukrainian Wikipedia, this is a normal and acceptable section of an article, so it's not clear to me. Keneris (talk) 10:24, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- I had to call in auxiliaries to find it; I remember it wasn't easy to find last time, and it is so self-evidently good advice: see here, WP:STRUCTURE. Drmies (talk) 20:39, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- Actually, the short description was removed by me due to a technical error, I apologize for that. Twitter is indeed an unreliable source, but CNN comes next, which is already a reliable source. Still, if it all comes to the Tweet that CNN wrote about, it might be relevant. Also, please clarify which rule/discussion does not recommend sections of "Controversy". In Ukrainian Wikipedia, this is a normal and acceptable section of an article, so it's not clear to me. Keneris (talk) 10:24, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Well, there's also Twitter, and dzrhnews, whatever that is--but there are more problems; I picked one of the templates. For some reason you removed the short description and placed a web citation template in there. Then, the entire article is loaded with trivial celeb stuff, it suffers from promotional editing, and your whole thing is basically about a tweet. Plus, "Controversies" (or "Scandals") sections are discouraged. Put all that together and you have, in my opinion and that of others, something that doesn't improve the article. Does that make sense? Drmies (talk) 02:37, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
September 2023
Hello, I'm Fyunck(click). I noticed that you recently removed content from Yany Kapu without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't remove proper redirects. It was explained once in a page summary when you moved a hot-topic article without any consensus, and now you blanked its redirect. Fyunck(click) (talk) 01:28, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
даун
пішов на хуй 194.44.182.163 (talk) 08:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)