Consumer-resource model
This article, Consumer-resource model, has recently been created via the Articles for creation process. Please check to see if the reviewer has accidentally left this template after accepting the draft and take appropriate action as necessary.
Reviewer tools: Inform author |
In theoretical ecology and nonlinear dynamics, consumer-resource models (CRMs), also known as resource-competition models, are a class of ordinary differential equations-based ecological models in which a community of consumer species compete for a common pool of resources. Instead of species interacting directly, all species-species interactions are mediated through resource dynamics. Consumer-resource models have served as fundamental tools in the quantitative development of theories of niche construction, coexistence, and biological diversity. These models can be interpreted as a quantitative description of a single (or multiple) trophic level(s).[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]
A general consumer-resource model consists of M resources whose abundances are and S consumer species whose populations are . A general consumer-resource model is described by the system of coupled ordinary differential equations,where , depending only on resource abundances, is the per-capita growth rate of species , and is the growth rate of resource . An essential feature of CRMs is that species growth rates and populations are mediated through resources and there are no explicit species-species interactions. Despite this, there remains implicit dependence due to the interacting nature of the system.
History
Add a bunch... Developed and introduced significantly by Robert H. MacArthur and Richard Levins.
Models
Niche models
Niche models are a notable class of CRMs which are described by the system of coupled ordinary differential equations,[8]
where is a vector abbreviation for resource abundances, is the per-capita growth rate of species , is the growth rate of species in the absence of consumption, and is the rate per unit species population that species depletes the abundance of resource through consumption. In this class of CRMs, consumer species' impacts on resources are not explicitly coordinated; however, there are implicit interactions.
MacArthur consumer resource model (MCRM)
The MacArthur consumer resource model (MCRM), named after Robert H. MacArthur, is a foundational CRM for the development of niche and coexistence theories.[citation needed] The MCRM is given by the following set of coupled ordinary differential equations:[9][10]where is the relative preference of species for resource and also the relative amount by which resource is depleted by the consumption of consumer species ; is the steady-state carrying capacity of resource in absence of consumption (i.e., when is zero); and are time-scales for species and resource dynamics, respectively; is the quality of resource ; and is the natural mortality rate of species . This model is said to have self-replenishing resource dynamics because when , each resource exhibits independent logistic growth. Given positive parameters and initial conditions, this model approaches a unique uninvadable steady state (i.e., a steady state in which the re-introduction of a species which has been driven to extinction or a resource which has been depleted leads to the re-introduced species or resource dying out again).[8] Steady states of the MCRM satisfy the competitive exclusion principle: the number of coexisting species is less than or equal to the number of non-depleted resources. In other words, the number of simultaneously-occupiable ecological niches is equal to the number of non-depleted resources.
Occasionally, the MacArthur consumer resource model is extended to the asymmetric MacArthur consumer resource model (aMCRM) by changing the relative weights by which resource abundances are depleted through consumption:[11]Restricting recovers the original MCRM.
Externally-supplied resources model (eCRM)
The externally-supplied resource model (eCRM) is similar to the MCRM except the resources are provided at a constant rate from an external source instead of being self-replenished. It is described by the following set of coupled ordinary differential equations:[9][10]where all the parameters shared with the MCRM are the same, and is the rate at which resource is supplied to the ecosystem. In the eCRM, in the absence of consumption, decays to exponentially with timescale .
Tilman consumer resource model (TCRM)
The Tilman consumer-resource model (TCRM), named after G. David Tilman, is similar to the eCRM except the rate at which a species depletes a resource is no longer proportional to the present abundance of the resource. The TCRM is the foundational model for Tilman's R* rule. It is described by the following set of coupled ordinary differential equations:[9][10]where all parameters are shared with the MCRM. In the TCRM, resource abundances can become nonphysically negative.
Microbial consumer resource model (MiCRM)
The microbial consumer resource model describes a microbial ecosystem with externally-supplied resources where consumption can produce metabolic byproducts, leading to potential cross-feeding. It is described by the following set of coupled ODEs:where all parameters shared with the MCRM have similar interpretations; is the fraction of the byproducts due to consumption of resource which are converted to resource and is the "leakage fraction" of resource governing how much of the resource is released into the environment as metabolic byproducts.[13][8]
Multi-trophic Model
The multi-trophic consumer-resource model extends the typical paradigm of consumer-resource models which describe single trophic levels to describe multiple trophic levels. A description of an ecosystem with two-level trophic structure consists of primary producers with abundances , primary consumers with populations , and secondary consumers with populations . In an example ecosystem, the primary producers could be plants, the primary consumers could be herbivores, and the secondary consumers could be carnivores; in this example, plants self-renew or are supplied externally, herbivores only consume plants, and carnivores only consume herbivores. Such a two-level trophic structure can be described by the following set of coupled ODEs:[14]The form of the multi-trophic CRM has similar structure to the MCRM, specifically in that the primary producers are self-renewing. This model can be generalized further by allowing for any number of intermediate consumer/predator species where species in the th trophic level consume only those in the th trophic level and are consumed only by those in the th trophic level. Such intermediate-level trophic interactions could be described by the following set of coupled ODEs:[14]
Experimental results
Connection to Lotka–Volterra models
The (asymmetric) MacArthur consumer resource model can be written in the form of a generalized Lotka–Volterra model:For the aMCRM, there are species where is identified with for is identified with for . In this form, the relevant Lotka–Volterra parameters are,Some but not all consumer resource models can be written as generalized Lotka–Volterra models.
Symmetric interactions and constrained optimization
MacArthur's Minimization Principle
For the MacArthur consumer resource model (MCRM), MacArthur introduced an optimization principle to identify the uninvadable steady state of the model (i.e., the steady state so that if any species with zero population is re-introduced, it will fail to invade, meaning the ecosystem will return to said steady state). To derive the optimization principle, one assumes resource dynamics become sufficiently fast (i.e., ) that they become entrained to species dynamics and are constantly at steady state (i.e., ) so that is expressed as a function of . With this assumption, one can express species dynamics as,where denotes a sum over resource abundances which satisfy . The above expression can be written as , where,
At un-invadable steady state for all surviving species and for all extinct species .[8][15][16][17][18]
Minimum Environmental Perturbation Principle (MEPP)
MacArthur's Minimization Principle has been extended to the more general Minimum Environmental Perturbation Principle (MEPP) which maps certain niche CRM models to constrained optimization problems. When the population growth conferred upon a species by consuming a resource is related to the impact the species' consumption has on the resource's abundance through the equation,species-resource interactions are said to be symmetric. In the above equation and are arbitrary functions of resource abundances. When this symmetry condition is satisfied, it can be shown that there exists a function such that:[8]After determining this function , the steady-state uninvadable resource abundances and species populations are the solution to the constrained optimization problem:The species populations are the Lagrange multipliers for the constraints on the second line. This can be seen by looking at the KKT conditions, taking to be the Lagrange multipliers:Lines 1, 3, and 4 are the statements of feasibility and uninvadability: if , then must be zero otherwise the system would not be at steady state, and if , then must be non-positive otherwise species would be able to invade. Line 2 is the stationarity condition and the steady-state condition for the resources in nice CRMs. The function can be interpreted as a distance by defining the point in the state space of resource abundances at which it is zero, , to be its minimum. The Lagrangian for the dual problem which leads to the above KKT conditions is,The above Lagrangian does not constitute a Lyapunov function.
Geometric perspectives
Talk about ZNGIs[4]
Complex ecosystems
Steady states and attractors
References
- ^ Chase, Jonathan M.; Leibold, Mathew A. (2003). Ecological Niches. University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226101811.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-226-10180-4.
- ^ Pimm, Stuart L. (September 1983). "TILMAN, D. 1982. Resource competition and community structure. Monogr. Pop. Biol. 17. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. 296 p. $27.50". Limnology and Oceanography. 28 (5): 1043–1045. Bibcode:1983LimOc..28.1043P. doi:10.4319/lo.1983.28.5.1043.
- ^ Levins, Richard (1968). Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. (MPB-2). Princeton University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctvx5wbbh. ISBN 978-0-691-07959-2. JSTOR j.ctvx5wbbh.
- ^ a b Mancuso, Christopher P; Lee, Hyunseok; Abreu, Clare I; Gore, Jeff; Khalil, Ahmad S (2021-09-03). Shou, Wenying; Walczak, Aleksandra M; Shou, Wenying (eds.). "Environmental fluctuations reshape an unexpected diversity-disturbance relationship in a microbial community". eLife. 10: e67175. doi:10.7554/eLife.67175. ISSN 2050-084X. PMC 8460265. PMID 34477107.
- ^ Dal Bello, Martina; Lee, Hyunseok; Goyal, Akshit; Gore, Jeff (October 2021). "Resource–diversity relationships in bacterial communities reflect the network structure of microbial metabolism". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 5 (10): 1424–1434. doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01535-8. ISSN 2397-334X. PMID 34413507. S2CID 256708107.
- ^ Posfai, Anna; Taillefumier, Thibaud; Wingreen, Ned S. (2017-01-12). "Metabolic Trade-Offs Promote Diversity in a Model Ecosystem". Physical Review Letters. 118 (2): 028103. Bibcode:2017PhRvL.118b8103P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.028103. PMC 5743855. PMID 28128613.
- ^ Stevens, Hank. Preface | Primer of Ecology using R.
- ^ a b c d e f Marsland, Robert; Cui, Wenping; Mehta, Pankaj (2020-09-01). "The Minimum Environmental Perturbation Principle: A New Perspective on Niche Theory". The American Naturalist. 196 (3): 291–305. doi:10.1086/710093. ISSN 0003-0147. PMID 32813998. S2CID 59316948.
- ^ a b c Cui, Wenping; Marsland, Robert; Mehta, Pankaj (2020-07-21). "Effect of Resource Dynamics on Species Packing in Diverse Ecosystems". Physical Review Letters. 125 (4): 048101. arXiv:1911.02595. Bibcode:2020PhRvL.125d8101C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.048101. PMC 8999492. PMID 32794828.
- ^ a b c Cui, Wenping; Marsland, Robert; Mehta, Pankaj (2021-09-27). "Diverse communities behave like typical random ecosystems". Physical Review E. 104 (3): 034416. Bibcode:2021PhRvE.104c4416C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.104.034416. PMC 9005152. PMID 34654170.
- ^ Blumenthal, Emmy; Rocks, Jason W.; Mehta, Pankaj (2023). "Phase transition to chaos in complex ecosystems with non-reciprocal species-resource interactions". Arxiv. arXiv:2308.15757. PMC 10491343. PMID 37693181.
- ^ MacArthur, Robert (1970-05-01). "Species packing and competitive equilibrium for many species". Theoretical Population Biology. 1 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1016/0040-5809(70)90039-0. ISSN 0040-5809. PMID 5527624.
- ^ Marsland, Robert; Cui, Wenping; Mehta, Pankaj (2020-02-24). "A minimal model for microbial biodiversity can reproduce experimentally observed ecological patterns". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 3308. arXiv:1904.12914. Bibcode:2020NatSR..10.3308M. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-60130-2. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 7039880. PMID 32094388.
- ^ a b Feng, Zhijie; Marsland, Robert; Rocks, Jason W.; Mehta, Pankaj (2023). "Emergent competition shapes the ecological properties of multi-trophic ecosystems". Arxiv: arXiv:2303.02983v1. arXiv:2303.02983. PMC 10029053. PMID 36945692.
- ^ Arthur, Robert Mac (December 1969). "Species Packing, and What Competition Minimizes". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 64 (4): 1369–1371. doi:10.1073/pnas.64.4.1369. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 223294. PMID 16591810.
- ^ MacArthur, Robert (1970-05-01). "Species packing and competitive equilibrium for many species". Theoretical Population Biology. 1 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1016/0040-5809(70)90039-0. ISSN 0040-5809. PMID 5527624.
- ^ Haygood, Ralph (March 2002). "Coexistence in MacArthur-Style Consumer–Resource Models". Theoretical Population Biology. 61 (2): 215–223. doi:10.1006/tpbi.2001.1566. PMID 11969391.
- ^ Case, Ted J.; Casten, Richard G. (1979). "Global Stability and Multiple Domains of Attraction in Ecological Systems". The American Naturalist. 113 (5): 705–714. doi:10.1086/283427. ISSN 0003-0147. JSTOR 2459962. S2CID 85016468.