User talk:KHarbaugh

Hello, KHarbaugh! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! —innotata 16:18, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

DS notice for Murder of Seth Rich

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Geogene (talk) 23:43, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, KHarbaugh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, KHarbaugh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Larry C. Johnson

You are skating on thin ice, KHarbaugh--you could be blocked for edit warring, for instance, or worse, you could be blocked/topic banned for violating guidelines related to "post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people"; you've been warned already about that. I strongly suggest that a. you stop trying to insert that material against consensus, and b. that you consider what Wikipedia is. It is not, for instance, a free-speech zone or a place where someone can go and set some record straight without citing reliable sources. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 19:07, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 23:44, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I called this "disruptive editing" because it involved edit warring, use of unreliable sourcing, NPOV editing and using article space as a forum, and on top of that personal insults in this post. As for the question you asked me on my talk page, I think you should look at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American_politics_2#Principles, specifically "Consensus", "Behavioral standards", "Neutrality and sources", and "Edit warring", because you fell foul of all of those. Drmies (talk) 23:50, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi. What in the post you referenced (and deleted) did you consider a "personal insult"? Thank you. KHarbaugh (talk) 21:26, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Correction: Having read the Wikipedia page on "Personal attacks", I can see where my comment ran afoul of its guidelines. No need to spend time answering my question, I will resubmit the original comment in a less contentious style. KHarbaugh (talk) 21:35, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnicelebs.com as a source

Hi KHarbaugh. I noticed that you recently used ethnicelebs.com as a source for biographical information in Adam Schiff . Please note that there is general consensus that ethnicelebs.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See User_talk:XLinkBot/RevertList#EthniCelebs.com). Geni.com appears similarly unreliable. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 17:19, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea how reliable those pages are. But I do know that many on the web are asserting that Adam is a descendant of Jacob Schiff, the well-known NYC financier. It would clearly be good if Wikipedia could give an authoritative "Yes or No" to that issue. KHarbaugh (talk) 17:30, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also, clicking on the link you provided, User_talk:XLinkBot/RevertList#EthniCelebs.com , takes me to the top of that page. At this time, there does not seem to be an entry for EthniCelebs.com on that page. Is your information out of date, or is that page out of date? KHarbaugh (talk) 17:56, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, KHarbaugh. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Ross Street and Max Kelly, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. — MarkH₂₁^talk 03:51, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Consider helping with an article?

Would you consider helping here? Talk:Investigation of UFO reports by the United States government Jjhake (talk) 16:42, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jjhake I'll do what I can. Not sure how much I can do. KHarbaugh (talk) 17:07, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for considering and anything that you might be able to add. It's a massive and messy topic and you seem to follow the news reports. Jjhake (talk) 17:12, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I was wondering if you would kindly give your opinion regarding the following. much apprecialted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:David_Grusch_UFO_whistleblower_claims#Credulity_thy_name_is_Daragahi?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:David_Grusch_UFO_whistleblower_claims#Wording_edit_for_the_summary Westerosi456H (talk) 00:14, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Westerosi456H I appreciate and applaud your efforts. On the specific issue of BD (I can't remember how to spell his name), I do not desire to venture an opinion. I have no basis to offer a judgement.

But, again, I applaud your efforts to uncover relevant information. KHarbaugh (talk) 00:46, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Grusch article

Hi friend,

I was not able to edit this article for some reason, wondering if you're able to make this edit.

"Milley added that he was not that surprised that such ideas would circulate and be believed by some within an organization as large as the U.S. military."

I was not able to find this sentence anywhere in the 2 sources given in the article. Lonestar-physicist (talk) 03:48, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was also wondering if you could please add the following in responce to intercept article leaking his medical records:

"This riled up lawmakers like Burchett, who said in a response to the above tweet on August 8, "Trying to discredit a decorated veteran like David Grusch shows the desperation of the group trying to hide the truth. They will fail."

https://www.foxnews.com/us/lawmakers-demand-truth-about-secret-ufo-programs-letter-inspector-general Lonestar-physicist (talk) 03:53, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lonestar-physicist I was able to find it in the web archive version of the Wash Times article. But I don't want to add it myself to the Wikipedia article - not sure how much it matters. KHarbaugh (talk) 04:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you. could you please remove the following from article? It wasn't in any article/

"Milley added that he was not that surprised that such ideas would circulate and be believed by some within an organization as large as the U.S. military." Lonestar-physicist (talk) 13:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lonestar-physicist

In https://web.archive.org/web/20230807023919/https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/aug/6/joint-chiefs-chair-mark-milley-claims-alien-recove/

the following appears:

"[Gen. Milley] said “a lot of people have different perspectives” on various issues in an organization as large as the Defense Department."

The reference at https://web.archive.org/web/20230808124653/https://americanmilitarynews.com/2023/08/gen-milley-denies-govt-covering-up-aliens-ufos/

says:

"Milley emphasized the variety of perspectives within an organization as vast as the Defense Department."

In comparison, the current Wikipedia article says:

"Milley added that he was not that surprised that such ideas would circulate and be believed by some within an organization as large as the U.S. military.[43][44]"

I agree the statements are not exactly the same.

I don't know who added the statement to Wikipedia.

But I don't think I should be the one to change it, if it needs changing.

I don't have full background on this.

If you are really concerned about this, you should add a comment to the Talk page section on Milley. KHarbaugh (talk) 15:02, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, now I see who made that addition.

It was Jjhake here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1169597173

He initiated this page, and has been "mother-henning" it. KHarbaugh (talk) 15:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That URL worked earlier, but not now.

Anyhow, it was on 10 August. KHarbaugh (talk) 15:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. Lonestar-physicist (talk) 16:06, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see yes that's it Lonestar-physicist (talk) 16:06, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi

Washington post just publihsed the following, Since the article of Grusch is extended protected, I was wondering if you deem appropriate to add the following from the article to Grusch article:

“The American public has a right to learn about technologies of unknown origins, nonhuman intelligence, and unexplainable phenomena,” Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said in July.

https://archive.ph/FpaQi#selection-1297.0-1302.0 Scott-matthews-301 (talk) 21:25, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]