User talk:2d37

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1;

This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article.

Welcome

Uh, hi. I'm surprised no one has posted the usual welcome template here with all sorts of helpful information. But if you'd like, I can find it & add it here.

In any case, no editor should lack a Talk page. So that's been fixed. -- llywrch (talk) 16:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'm guessing the usual welcome template would be {{welcome}}, or at least one of the many templates at WP:Welcome templates — but I've spent too many nights already reading through project space when I should have been sleeping, so I think I'll let those alone for now :-). —2d37 (talk) 06:34, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DiscussionTools update

Hello,

The Editing team has scheduled a major update to mw:Extension:DiscussionTools (the new Reply tool) for next week's deployment train. Since you invoke the feature from a script (I do, too), you're probably going to see that update next week, before it's officially released in the mw:Beta Feature system. The new update will use a similar system for starting a ==New discussion==. As before, full-page wikitext editing will not be affected. There is more information on the project page at mw:Talk pages project/New discussion.

You don't have to do anything about this; I just didn't want you to be surprised. If you encounter problems next week, please ping me or leave a note on the talk page for the project. Thanks, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 22:18, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Access dates

Hi, re your comment as to why some access dates were commented out, the position is that if a permanent ID is present, like a DOI, they aren't needed. See Help:Citation Style 1#Access date. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:18, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. (For future reference: this was in relation to my edit summary in Special:Diff/1030111269.) —2d37 (talk) 08:10, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Application of MOS:LANG to loanwords

Hi 2d37

At Sweet potato cultivation in Polynesia you have encased numerous words of Māori origin in {{lang}}, per MOS:LANG. This is quite correct in some cases, but in some other cases it seems incorrect to me. I want to check your thinking about this. MOS:LANG says, "Non-English words or phrases should be encased in {{lang}}". However, Wikipedia:Manual of Style says, "Non-English names [of organisms] that have become English-assimilated are treated as English". It says further, "A non-English proper name should generally not be italicized, unless it would be for some other reason".

Words that you have treated as non-English include kōwhai, kūmara, mana, pūkeko, tohunga and waka, all of which are listed at List of English words of Māori origin. Many proper names have also been treated as non-English, including names of places (e.g. Aotearoa and Whakatāne), people, tribes and canoes.

On reconsideration, would you agree that these cases can be treated as English and not be encased in {{lang}}"? Thanks. Nurg (talk) 02:39, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In thought I am reluctant to agree, but in action I defer to your greater experience. I confess I did not expect MOS:LANG, saying nothing about capital letters, to be subject to an exception buried in WP:MOS § Capital letters. Would you object if I move this thread to the article's talk page? —2d37 (talk) 23:30, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have no objection to you moving this thread to the article's talk page. Nurg (talk) 08:57, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, 2d37. Thank you for your work on 2021 Italy wildfires. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:18, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Thank you, but I did not write 2021 Italy wildfires. Most of the history for that article is at Special:PageHistory/2021 Italian wildfires. My one substantive contribution to the article was Special:Diff/1040237015. —2d37 (talk) 20:29, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Archives (Index)
1