Jump to content

Talk:Spinosaurus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WaspDragon2000 (talk | contribs) at 17:45, 12 October 2023 (Semi-protected edit request on 12 October 2023: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Good articleSpinosaurus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 5, 2007Good article nomineeListed
June 27, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

The snout

Please consider referencing: Romain Vullo, Ronan Allain, and Lionel Cavin. Convergent evolution of jaws between spinosaurid dinosaurs and pike conger eels. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 61 (4), 2016: 825-828 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4202/app.00284.2016

I thought maroccanus was a subspecies?

Title 155.4.124.213 (talk) 20:56, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Photo

The Field Museum recently installed a cast of FSAC-KK-11888. It includes the new material (tail paddle) and is displayed in a swimming pose. I wanted to see what others thought before incorporating in the article since questions have been raised about the "semi-aquatic" behavior and the fact that this specimen may not be Spinosaurus.

3blindMies (talk) 12:37, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks better than our current taxobox photo, which is also in swimming posture. It's not like it couldn't swim at all even if it wasn't semi-aquatic, so there's nothing inaccurate about it. Might you have a version with background as well? Can also be useful. FunkMonk (talk) 13:07, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Here's a cropped version with the background.
  • 3blindMies (talk) 21:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Nice, I see it's of course more busy with the background. Either way, these are an improvement, so I think the infobox image should be replaced. FunkMonk (talk) 11:54, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    New images look nice, though perhaps the image without background could be cropped more tightly, as currently there's lots of unused space above and below? --Slate Weasel [Talk - Contribs] 19:00, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, thought the same. FunkMonk (talk) 20:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected edit request on 12 October 2023

    WaspDragon2000 (talk) 17:45, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]