Talk:Puberty

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.

Template:Vital article

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Puberty article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3: 2 months

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Physiology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the physiology of reproduction.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Second post-natal HPG activation or "Mini Puberty"

Should there be a section about "mini puberty" if so we can redirect to the HPG axis article. NOKGRIMM (talk) 12:34, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question

People say puberty is delayed how? How can you be delayed puberty? 41.114.222.61 (talk) 20:58, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This page has pedo bait. Please remove them.

I've only just heard that this page contains actual images of naked children and this boils my blood so badly. I get that you're showing them for educational purposes, but even showing nude children is pedo bait. Sick bastards will be sexually excited by this crap, and then may put their hands on actual child or see actual CP. Please remove this. FreezingTNT2 (talk) 13:05, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see you're coming from there. We're not going to purge nudity because there's perversion. That's a line of thought that only lead to Burkas, and no less perverts.--Aréat (talk) 14:16, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Children don't have to wear burqas, but you are exposing their private parts to sick bastards!!!!! FreezingTNT2 (talk) 14:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Aréat Could we replace them with drawings of development instead? the pictures are for a medical education, but I see FreezingTNT2's point. Natasha862 (talk) 00:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly disagree. That would be against the usage on all pages about body parts and others medical theme. Please don't give credits to these messages basically calling pediatrician pedophiles. --Aréat (talk) 01:13, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree I think the minors should be removed because creeps and it looks old. Just replace with tanner diagrams. Trust me another kid doesn’t want to to see someone there age naked. Gex273 (talk) 00:29, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary Photos

There are images with kids naked with the developmental stages. The images are unnecessary and outdated, the images are over 70 years old. If you really want to have photos there just replace them with models or more up to date images. Gex273 (talk) 19:23, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]