Jump to content

Talk:Maassluis Steendijkpolder metro station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ymblanter (talk | contribs) at 15:16, 15 October 2023 (New station: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconNetherlands Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconTrains Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New station

Since we are clearly going for a 3RR block, I would like to remind the IP editor that WP:V does not mandate removing material on the first sight (with some exception such as vandalism and BLP). The editor is expected first to try finding sources, then add {{cn}}, and only after a reasonable time sources still do not appear, and there are doubts that the information is correct it can be removed. Ymblanter (talk) 14:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material. Your behaviour is extremely inappropriate for someone who is apparently an administrator. You cannot possibly be unfamiliar with the verifiability policy, so your behaviour can only be deliberately disruptive. 80.3.192.137 (talk) 14:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Did you try to find sources which support the claim? Or do you have other reasons to think the claim is incorrect? Ymblanter (talk) 15:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]