Talk:Maassluis Steendijkpolder metro station

	Netherlands portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Trains Stub‑class Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New station

Since we are clearly going for a 3RR block, I would like to remind the IP editor that WP:V does not mandate removing material on the first sight (with some exception such as vandalism and BLP). The editor is expected first to try finding sources, then add {{cn}}, and only after a reasonable time sources still do not appear, and there are doubts that the information is correct it can be removed. Ymblanter (talk) 14:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material. Your behaviour is extremely inappropriate for someone who is apparently an administrator. You cannot possibly be unfamiliar with the verifiability policy, so your behaviour can only be deliberately disruptive. 80.3.192.137 (talk) 14:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you try to find sources which support the claim? Or do you have other reasons to think the claim is incorrect? Ymblanter (talk) 15:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material. I don't think you care about the content at all though. You are just trying to be a bully. 80.3.192.137 (talk) 21:46, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]