User talk:Lilijuros

Welcome!

Hi Lilijuros! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — TheresNoTime (talk • she/her) 16:40, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TheresNoTime, thank you. Lilijuros (talk) 16:46, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 15:46, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I'm aware Lilijuros (talk) 15:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AE

Youve been reported to arbitration enforcement, see WP:AE#Lilijuros. nableezy - 20:38, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violating the WP:ARBECR in place in the topic area, even while the matter was being discussed at WP:AE, and more generally for perpetuating a battleground atmosphere, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.

-- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 00:39, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

את יהודיה?@Tamzin Lilijuros (talk) 08:29, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

כן. But I don't see what that has to do with anything. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 11:32, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

היא גם תומכת בחיזבלנור כמו נבליזי, וחוסמת בסיטונאות כל מי שהוא לא פרו-פלשתינאי. תזהר פה., היא לא לטובתך. אתה צריך להתנצל ולהימנע מעריכות כלשהן על סכסוך ערבי-ישראלי עד שיש לך 500 עריכות. זה אחד מהשטיקים שמשממשים פה את הפרו-פלשתינאים לעיף מכאן עורכים יהודים. 37.48.32.132 (talk) 14:09, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamzin, I understand now my actions and realize I was under an agitation. I'm sorry and take responsibility for my actions. Yet, isn't a limit-less block to harsh compared to my comment? On the heb wikipedia in which I'm a senior and deedful user, such a hard response will never be enforced on such comment, but as a response to harder comments. 2A01:73C0:501:C153:0:0:6B8:DC1 (talk) 14:20, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]