1881–1896 cholera pandemic
Fifth cholera pandemic | |
---|---|
Disease | Cholera |
Bacteria strain | Vibrio cholerae |
First outbreak | Ganges Delta in West Bengal |
Dates | 1881–1896 |
The fifth cholera pandemic (1881–1896) was the fifth major international outbreak of cholera in the 19th century. The endemic origin of the pandemic, as had its predecessors, was in the Ganges Delta in West Bengal.[1][2] While the Vibrio cholerae bacteria had not been able to spread to western Europe until the 19th century, faster and improved modes of modern transportation, such as steamships and railways, reduced the duration of the journey considerably and facilitated the transmission of cholera and other infectious diseases.[1][3]
In addition, the growing colonial rule of the British in India, and France's colonial war in Indo-China,[4] with its increased military presence and economic exchanges multiplied the connections both inside Asia and between Asia and Europe. Therefore, cholera for the first time could spread significantly outside its original source habitat on the Indian subcontinent, where it had been home for centuries.[1][3] The fifth cholera pandemic would be known in Europe as the 'eastern plague'.[4] A better insight in the disease and improved sanitation limited mortality largely in Europe and North America, although some substantial outbreaks in Europe did happen.[5]
During this pandemic, there were significant scientific advances that improved the control of the disease. German microbiologist Robert Koch isolated Vibrio cholerae and proposed postulates to explain how bacteria caused disease. His work helped to establish the germ theory of disease.[6] In 1892, the Russian-French bacteriologist Waldemar Haffkine, developed a cholera vaccine.[7]
The spread of the pandemic
In 1881, the cholera bacterium spread both East and West, and eventually reached Europe and Latin America.[2][8] From its endemic origin in the Ganges Delta in West Bengal, there was a virulent outbreak in the Punjab and Lahore in northwest India in the years 1881-82, with a very serious death rate. Other early outbreaks occurred in Korea in 1881, and in Thailand in 1882. Mecca (Arabia), with its yearly influx of Muslim pilgrims, was hit during both these years. Further eastward outbreaks occurred in China (also in 1883), and in Japan, followed by the Philippines in 1882-83.[2] In the following years cholera in Asia hit China in 1888, 1890, and 1895; Japan in 1885, 1886, 1890, 1891, and 1895; Korea in 1888, 1890, 1891, and 1895; and the Philippines in 1888-89.[2]
In 1883 it reached Egypt and in the course of a few months, tens of thousands of victims died.[1] Further westward cholera outbreaks occurred in April 1884 in the naval base Toulon,[4] France, with smaller outbreaks in Marseilles, Paris, and other cities, affecting 10,000 people all over France.[2] In 1885, some of the same areas were again infected. Italian migrant workers brought cholera from France to Italy, with a serious outbreak in the city of Naples in August-September 1884.[9] There were minor outbreaks in Italy in 1886-87 without causing epidemics.[2] The outbreak provoked a poisoning "phobia" directed primarily against Gypsies.[10]
The pandemic also spread to Spain, with a minor outbreak starting in Alicante on the Mediterranean coast.[11] But with a more virulent one at the end of 1885, with 160,000 cases and about 60,000 deaths.[2] In 1890 there was another smaller outbreak. According to The New York Times in 1890, cholera had swept away about 120,000 of the inhabitants in the country.[12] Quarantine measures for ships and immigrants based on the findings of the British physician, John Snow, prevented cholera outbreaks in Great Britain and the United States.[2][8][13] However, the disease reached Latin America with serious outbreaks in 1886 (Argentina), 1887 (Chile), and 1888 (Argentina and Chile).[2]
The pandemic reappeared in 1891 and originated in Bengal when 60,000 Hindu pilgrims arrived at a small village to celebrate a bathing festival unknown to the authorities. The pilgrims caused new immense cholera outbreaks in northern India during 1891, with more than 580,000 cholera deaths in Assam, Bengal, and Uttar Pradesh.[14] The disease continued westward in 1892, across the Punjab (with 75,000 cholera deaths), and raged on through Afghanistan and claimed 60,000 lives in Persia,[14][15] and then reached Russia which suffered a staggering morbidity rate, exacerbated by the Russian famine of 1891–1892.[16] Cholera's penetration in Russia began at Baku, a port on the Caspian Sea. The disease spread upstream along the Volga to reach Moscow and St. Petersburg, where morbidity was relatively minor. The official death toll for 1892 was 300,321. The epidemic faded during the winter and 42,250 cholera deaths were recorded in 1893.[16]
The busy ports of Hamburg in Germany, and New York City, the main exit and entry points for cross Atlantic emigration from Europe to the United States, were hit by serious cholera outbreaks in 1892. New York, the busiest port of the U.S. was hit by a combination of typhus fever and cholera in 1892 through Hamburg.[17] The main source of those epidemics were East European Jews, mainly from Russia, that tried to escape the appalling conditions, the 1891–1892 famine, and antisemitic restrictions (such as the expulsion of Jews from Moscow early in 1892) in their home country.[18][19] In Europe in 1892, the disease was alo prevalent in France. Germany and France were reinfected in 1893-94 but outbreaks did not reach epidemic levels.[2] Latin America again suffered attacks several times in the 1890s. Brazil was hit with cholera in 1893-95, Argentina in 1894-95, and Uruguay in 1895.[2] The pandemic also reached the African continent, with outbreaks in 1893 (Tripolitania, Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco, and French West Africa), 1894 (Sudan, Tripolitania, and French West Africa), 1895 (Morocco and Egypt), and 1896 (Egypt).[2]
Outbreak in Egypt
In late June 1883, the first cases of cholera in Egypt, recently occupied by the British Empire in 1882, occurred in the port city of Damietta on the Mediterranean coast and rapidly spread in the Nile Delta and throughout the country in the summer and autumn,[20] "notwithstanding cordons maintained with a degree of severity and cruelty almost unexampled".[21] In the course of a few months, 50,000[20] or 60,000[1] people died. The sources of the contamination most likely were Muslim pilgrims returning from Mecca and Indian troops serving in the British army.[1][2] The approach of the British administration in Egypt was determined more by concerns that trade out of Indian ports towards Britain risked to be quarantined, as well as economic concerns about spending on public health.[20]
The British administration therefore adopted an anti-contagionist stance, more favourable to British shareholders in Egyptian and Indian companies and shipping lines.[20] The rapid spread and the supposed inability of the population to deal with the epidemic itself was used to justify the newly established British administration of Egypt, despite the fact that Egypt had already developed a basic national health system before the British occupation that was praised by European observers. What was missing was an effective way to deal with the 1883 epidemic, which was compounded by European prejudices rooted in Orientalism, according to which the "Orientals" had no idea about health, science or hygiene.[20]
Outbreak in Hamburg
In the autumn of 1892 the city of Hamburg, Germany, was hit by a cholera epidemic lasting just over six weeks. Nearly 10,000 people died and many more suffered the appalling symptoms of the disease. No other city in western Europe was as seriously affected in this wave of the pandemic.[22] Although at the time it was fiercely contested, the infection of the city's water-supply was the main reason for the rapid spread of the cholera. The death rate of the population was 13.4 per cent according to the official statistics, but it may have even been higher.[23]
In 1893 violent riots broke out, because the public objected to sanitary officers trying to enforce regulations for the prevention of spread of the disease. The crowd beat to death a sanitary officer and one of the policemen sent to protect them. Troops were called out and dispersed the crowd with fixed bayonets.[24]
American author Mark Twain visited Hamburg during the outbreak. In a piece dated 1891-1892, he points out the insufficient information in local newspapers about the outbreak, particularly regarding death figures. Twain criticizes how impoverished individuals were forcefully moved to pest houses where many perished unrecognized and unceremoniously buried. He expresses disappointment at the global, and specifically American, lack of awareness concerning cholera.[25]
Scientific advances
In August 1883, the German government sent a medical team led by Robert Koch to Alexandria, Egypt, to investigate a cholera epidemic there.[6] As the outbreak in Egypt declined, he was transferred to Calcutta (now Kolkata) India, where there was a more severe outbreak. He soon found that the river Ganges was the source of cholera. He performed autopsies of almost 100 bodies, and found in each bacterial infection. He identified the same bacteria from water tanks, linking the source of the infection. Koch isolated Vibrio cholerae and proposed postulates to explain how bacteria caused disease. His work helped to establish the germ theory of disease.[6]
Prior to this time, many physicians believed the disease was caused by direct exposure to the products of filth and decay. Koch helped establish that the disease was more specifically contagious and was transmitted by exposure to the feces of an infected person, including through contaminated water supply.[26]
Waldemar Haffkine, a Russian-French bacteriologist, focused his research on developing a cholera vaccine, and produced an attenuated form of the bacterium. Risking his own life, on 18 July 1892, Haffkine performed the first human test on himself. To definitively test the vaccine, he needed an area where cholera was common to conduct large trials on humans and moved to India in 1894. After Haffkine's experiments in Calcutta showed promising results, he was asked by the owners of tea plantations in Assam to vaccinate their workers.[7]
Society and culture
The pandemic had a significant impact on the cultural history of the affected regions. For example, the pandemic inspired the creation of the "cholera waltz"[27] which was a satirical dance that mocked the government's response to the outbreak.[28]
The pandemic led to the introduction of new laws and regulations aimed at controlling the spread of the disease. For example, many countries introduced quarantine measures for ships arriving from affected regions.[28]
The pandemic was perceived as a threat to the social order and was often associated with the lower classes. The disease was also linked to poverty, filth, and immorality.[28]
The stigma associated with cholera led to the isolation and quarantine of infected individuals and their families. This often resulted in social ostracism and economic hardship.[28]
See also
References
- ^ a b c d e f Snowden, Naples in the time of cholera, 1884-1911, p. 59
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Kohn, Encyclopedia of Plague and Pestilence, p. 15
- ^ a b Hayes, The Burdens of Disease, p. 136; pp. 180-86
- ^ a b c Snowden, Naples in the time of cholera, 1884-1911, p. 62
- ^ Aberth, Plagues in World History, p. 102
- ^ a b c Howard-Jones, N. (1984). "Robert Koch and the cholera vibrio: a centenary". British Medical Journal. 288 (6414): 379–381. doi:10.1136/bmj.288.6414.379. PMC 1444283. PMID 6419937.
- ^ a b Gunter, Joel; Pandey, Vikas (11 December 2020). "Waldemar Haffkine: The vaccine pioneer the world forgot". BBC News. Retrieved 14 December 2020.
- ^ a b "Cholera's seven pandemics". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. May 9, 2008. Retrieved 14 May 2020.
- ^ Snowden, Naples in the time of cholera, 1884-1911, p. 104
- ^ Aberth, Plagues in World History, p. 105
- ^ Cholera Invades Spain. Great Alarm at Madrid And In The Provinces. The Dread Disease Appears in Alicante, The New York Times, September 3, 1884
- ^ The Cholera In Spain, The New York Times, June 20, 1890
- ^ Hayes, The Burdens of Disease, p. 147
- ^ a b Kohn, Encyclopedia of Plague and Pestilence, p. 151
- ^ Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 6 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 262–267, see page 265, para 3.
1892–1895.—
- ^ a b Kohn, Encyclopedia of Plague and Pestilence, p. 283-84
- ^ Markel, Quarantine!, pp. 88-90
- ^ Evans, Death in Hamburg, pp. 279-82
- ^ Markel, Quarantine!, p. 11; p. 18
- ^ a b c d e Rose, Christopher (25 May 2020). "A Tale of Two Contagions: Science, Imperialism, and the 1883 Cholera in Egypt". Islamic Law Blog. Harvard Law School. Retrieved 11 November 2023.
- ^ Snowden, Naples in the time of cholera, 1884-1911, p. 83, quoting The Progress of Cholera, The Lancet (1883, vol. 2), p. 159.
- ^ Evans, Death in Hamburg, p. vii
- ^ Evans, Death in Hamburg, pp. 292-93
- ^ Cholera Riot In Hamburg; Sanitary Officers Again Attacked By A Mob, The New York Times, October 11, 1893
- ^ Blount, Roy K. (2010). A tramp abroad. Following the equator: other travels. New York: Library of America. p. 1145.
- ^ Evans, Death in Hamburg, p. 267
- ^ Holsapple, Cortell King (1938). ""The Masque of the Red Death" and "I Promessi Sposi"". Studies in English (18). Holsapple, Cortell King: 137–39. JSTOR 20779501.
- ^ a b c d Briggs, Asa (1961). "Cholera and Society in the Nineteenth Century". Past & Present. 19 (19): 76–96. doi:10.1093/past/19.1.76. JSTOR 649981.
Sources
- Aberth, John (2011). Plagues in World History. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-7425-5705-5.
- Evans, Richard J. (1987). Death in Hamburg: Society and politics in the cholera years, 1830-1910. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 0-19-822864-3.
- Hayes, J.N. (2009). The Burdens of Disease: Epidemics and Human Response in Western History. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0-8135-4612-4.
- Kohn, George C. (2001). Encyclopedia of Plague and Pestilence: From Ancient Times to the Present. New York: Facts on File. ISBN 0-8160-4263-2.
- Markel, Howard (1999). Quarantine! East European Jewish Immigrants and the New York City Epidemics of 1892. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-80186180-2.
- Snowden, Frank M. (1995). Naples in the time of cholera, 1884-1911. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-585-13106-1.