User talk:Mathmensch

Archives

March 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:21, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I did not even have the time to respond. I've written ~20 articles and a wikibook, I don't know what this is about. --Mathmensch (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the very worst kind of cyberbullying one could imagine to experience. The climate here is poisonous. --Mathmensch (talk) 14:23, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TonyBallioni: Let me at least explain to you where your "analysis" fails. I've come here because I was insulted several times. I've not misbehaved according to any policy, but merely stated that I wanted to refrain from editing. I do want to improve this site, by removing insulting edits and admins. But apparently, my efforts are in vain. Let me conclude by stating that now, I do wish to return to work on articles, but only those related to Cyberbullying. --Mathmensch (talk) 14:30, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And talk page access is removed. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:33, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to appeal using WP:UTRS now that your TPA is revoked. Any admin should be feel free to unblock you without consulting me. I'd encourage them to read the relevant ANI threads and this user talk thread. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:35, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Mathmensch (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20985 was submitted on Mar 23, 2018 15:29:11. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:29, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not a good idea to unblock right now as we'll probably get pointy or disruptive edits on cyberbullying topics. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:37, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree except I think it's more likely than "probably". I also don't think the user will necessarily restrict their editing to just that topic. As I told them at my Talk page (before the block), based on their comments, they would be better off somewhere else on the Internet. Editing on Wikipedia with the sole goal of slamming the project and its editors is not contributing to the encylcopedia.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:45, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they were clearly editing here to prove a point, and have continued that editing on meta after this block, being disruptive there and ~~following SarekOfVulcan to his meta talk page after he couldn't post on en.wiki anymore.~~ I don't think unblocking would be wise, but I'm also not going to stand in the way if someone else wants to on UTRS. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:53, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong sequence of events. I removed text from m:Don't be a jerk that they had added after the last go-round. It was after that edit that they showed up on my talk. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:03, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sorry. They were fighting with -revi after the block based on the text that revi later removed from the userpage, and I saw the contributions and must have gotten the time stamps mixed up. My fault. Still, not exactly being a productive contributor cross-project. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:06, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Mathmensch (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21575 was submitted on May 20, 2018 18:07:35. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:07, 20 May 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Mathmensch (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21577 was submitted on May 20, 2018 19:43:18. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:43, 20 May 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Mathmensch (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23379 was submitted on Nov 26, 2018 07:58:18. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 07:58, 26 November 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Mathmensch (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24377 was submitted on Mar 19, 2019 18:21:11. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:21, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Di

Template:Di has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 18:49, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #80742

I have reenabled talk page access so this user may make an unblock request here, as per UTRS appeal #80742. --Yamla (talk) 11:39, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Block appeal #?

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Mathmensch (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I hope that (given my numerous occupations and current extreme fatigue) it will be forgiven that I simply copy & paste my remarks from over at the UTRS page, which was closed due to apparent technical difficulties.

It has now been several years since my block was instated. I have spent the time constructively (for instance, I am creating my mathematics series over at the German wikibooks https://de.wikibooks.org/wiki/Mathematik_f%C3%BCr_Faule ), but it happens every day that I find a wrong proof on the English wikipedia. Yesterday, I found that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bessel%27s_correction#Alternative_1 omits important parts of the proof, and today, I noticed that in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runge's_theorem#Proof it is only possible to expand a function as a Laurent series about its poles, whence the iterative procedure given is not sound. I therefore ask for my user ban to be lifted ONLY FOR EDITING MATHS AND PHYSICS ARTICLES.
It goes without saying that respectful discussion is the preferred way of dealing with conflicts on Wikipedia. I certainly do hope that I have not been unknowingly rough to anyone, and will take further steps to decrease the likelihood of that occurring.
I will abstain from writing about what I percieve to have been unjustified user bans. --Mathmensch (talk) 22:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I hope that (given my numerous occupations and current extreme fatigue) it will be forgiven that I simply copy & paste my remarks from over at the UTRS page, which was closed due to apparent technical difficulties.
#It has now been several years since my block was instated. I have spent the time constructively (for instance, I am creating my mathematics series over at the German wikibooks https://de.wikibooks.org/wiki/Mathematik_f%C3%BCr_Faule ), but it happens every day that I find a wrong proof on the English wikipedia. Yesterday, I found that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bessel%27s_correction#Alternative_1 omits important parts of the proof, and today, I noticed that in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runge's_theorem#Proof it is only possible to expand a function as a Laurent series about its poles, whence the iterative procedure given is not sound. I therefore ask for my user ban to be lifted ONLY FOR EDITING MATHS AND PHYSICS ARTICLES.
#It goes without saying that respectful discussion is the preferred way of dealing with conflicts on Wikipedia. I certainly do hope that I have not been unknowingly rough to anyone, and will take further steps to decrease the likelihood of that occurring.
#I will abstain from writing about what I percieve to have been unjustified user bans. --[[User:Mathmensch|Mathmensch]] ([[User talk:Mathmensch#top|talk]]) 22:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I hope that (given my numerous occupations and current extreme fatigue) it will be forgiven that I simply copy & paste my remarks from over at the UTRS page, which was closed due to apparent technical difficulties.
#It has now been several years since my block was instated. I have spent the time constructively (for instance, I am creating my mathematics series over at the German wikibooks https://de.wikibooks.org/wiki/Mathematik_f%C3%BCr_Faule ), but it happens every day that I find a wrong proof on the English wikipedia. Yesterday, I found that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bessel%27s_correction#Alternative_1 omits important parts of the proof, and today, I noticed that in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runge's_theorem#Proof it is only possible to expand a function as a Laurent series about its poles, whence the iterative procedure given is not sound. I therefore ask for my user ban to be lifted ONLY FOR EDITING MATHS AND PHYSICS ARTICLES.
#It goes without saying that respectful discussion is the preferred way of dealing with conflicts on Wikipedia. I certainly do hope that I have not been unknowingly rough to anyone, and will take further steps to decrease the likelihood of that occurring.
#I will abstain from writing about what I percieve to have been unjustified user bans. --[[User:Mathmensch|Mathmensch]] ([[User talk:Mathmensch#top|talk]]) 22:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I hope that (given my numerous occupations and current extreme fatigue) it will be forgiven that I simply copy & paste my remarks from over at the UTRS page, which was closed due to apparent technical difficulties.
#It has now been several years since my block was instated. I have spent the time constructively (for instance, I am creating my mathematics series over at the German wikibooks https://de.wikibooks.org/wiki/Mathematik_f%C3%BCr_Faule ), but it happens every day that I find a wrong proof on the English wikipedia. Yesterday, I found that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bessel%27s_correction#Alternative_1 omits important parts of the proof, and today, I noticed that in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runge's_theorem#Proof it is only possible to expand a function as a Laurent series about its poles, whence the iterative procedure given is not sound. I therefore ask for my user ban to be lifted ONLY FOR EDITING MATHS AND PHYSICS ARTICLES.
#It goes without saying that respectful discussion is the preferred way of dealing with conflicts on Wikipedia. I certainly do hope that I have not been unknowingly rough to anyone, and will take further steps to decrease the likelihood of that occurring.
#I will abstain from writing about what I percieve to have been unjustified user bans. --[[User:Mathmensch|Mathmensch]] ([[User talk:Mathmensch#top|talk]]) 22:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Mathmensch (talk) 22:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]