Talk:History of sushi

Please cite sources

Looks like there's a lot of interested people with a lot of good information out there.

However. One of the fundamental guidelines of contributing to the Wikipedia is to cite your sources.

Please.

Who knows: you might learn something new. :-)

DanielVonEhren 02:09, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

New article

I've just split the Sushi article in two by separating its History section into a separate article (this one).

The initial words are a simple cut-and-paste from the sub-sections on the Sushi page. This means that at the moment this is a poorly structured article: no real introduction, no context, and therefore no clear flow. I intend to rectify that over the next few days, but if anybody want to beat me to it, please do.

DanielVonEhren 16:33, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This little note may be a little unnecessary, but I want to say that I'm really happy are adding to this article (except the parts about rat urine). The new information going in here is great.

DanielVonEhren 20:45, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hi this is Charles from Japan. This is an interesting article, and I dont want to seem too critical, but I think the claim that sushi originated in China is absurd. Someone appears to have done some digging to come up with all these old Chinese characters, but none of it is explained, except that none of them refer to what we know of as sushi - which, as the second part shows, was clearly developed in Japan. The Chinese had nothing to do with the development of sushi, for Pete's sake.

Why can't the Japanese be given credit for their own national dish? Everything here didn't originate in China, you know. Yes, ramen originated in China. Sushi originated in Japan and it's unfair to the Japanese to say otherwise.

Finally, the standard Romanization for ?? is ritsuryô. You're using an outdated system. So, take my adivce and dump the whole first section on China, clean up the romanization, dispense with all the fancy characters that have nothing to do with the subject, and give credit where credit is due.

Hi Charles. You should give yourself an account and sign in. :-)

As to your comment "Take my advice and dump the whole first section...": While your idea might be a little extreme, you should be bold. Go forth and snip away (we can always revert).  :-) :-)

DanielVonEhren 20:59, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I have little expertise on the subject, but I have to be critical of this article as well; it's entire point seems to be to claim a Chinese origin for sushi. Sushi refers to a wide range of dishes in Japan, and similarly prepared rice-and-fish dishes have a history in Southern Korea as well (and probably the coastal regions of China). But the most important developments that led to the sushi we know today all took place in Japan--and many of them fairly recently.

The analysis of old Chinese characters often amount to little more than folk etymology, and should be used with caution. Overall, I am suspicious that parts of this article might have been written with a predetermined conclusion and the "everything originates from China" mentality. Perhaps the best solution might be to add that similar dishes were prepared in Japan's coastal neighbours as well, while being careful to pronounce any definite claims that the idea originated in one of those places. --Iceager 00:43, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

These old characters prove nothing. Equating the language to the characters used to write it is a common fallacy in the Orient. The problem is that the Japanese often took Chinese characters and applied them to something different from the original item. This was one way of adapting the Chinese writing system to write their own language. (In other cases they made up their own characters, or just took characters for their sound). It does look like someone Chinese has come up with a new way of claiming that everything originated in China.

Bathrobe 4 April

Well, well, it looks as though this was not written by a Chinese history megalomaniac but by a European! In fact, the soberest reaction (see further down) comes from a Chinese who expresses surprise at the statement that sushi was invented in China and requests evidence showing that the Japanese actually imported "鮨" and gradually improvised it. Toytoy has also clarified the fact that the characters used don't actually prove anything. I heartily agree with the overall thrust of Toytoy's rewriting of the article.

Bathrobe 4 April

Believe it or not, fishermen eat raw fish on the sea is ancient and almost global. However, even in most harbour cities, without the fast delivery infrastructure, no one dares to eat raw fish. The Japanese taste of raw fish is therefore unique. Chinese fishermen also eat raw fish. But those of us who are not living by the sea eat only cooked fish before the invention of refrigeration. People living by lakes or rivers may enjoy fresh freshwater fish. However, you don't want to eat them raw because these fish are known to contain parasites. I am Chinese. As far as I know, some costal people in China and Korea do enjoy raw fish but they are not mainstream. -- Toytoy 03:04, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)

Transliterations

It would be helpful if articles would provide transliterations of terms in non-Western scripts would provide transliterations. Either Wade-Giles or Pinyin will do - but do indicate which. Septentrionalis 20:00, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hi Pmanderson. Can you help with the transliterations? I myself am utterly clueless on Japanese; I could use help with quite a lot of translations, transliterations, and looking-up-of-glyphs. I don't put them in here or elsewhere because I don't have the knowledge.

DanielVonEhren 20:59, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I think the chinese and japanese characters are interesting, but make the article very hard to read. Can we go for simplicity? Sniffandgrowl 00:53, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I don't know if you shall use transliteration. These words were used over 2000 years ago. Their pronounciations were totally different from today's. -- Toytoy 00:55, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)

Does precision of the translation matter to the English reader? I think we should go for neccessity. Interesting as it may be, attempting to preserve the original flavor of the terminology is having a confusing effect on the flow of the article. Sniffandgrowl 01:29, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The fish-themed mug

Can anyone take a picture of the mug filled with Kanji letters with the fish radical? In Japan, some sushi restaurants are using this kind of mug.

• The "fish" radical: 魚 (usually placed on the left side of a word at half-width)
• Words with the fish radical: 鱔, 鯉, 鱖, 鯖, 鮪, 鯽, ... (dozens of them; fish names; many are obsolete today)

These mugs are educational. Most educated Japanese cannot read, possibly, 50% of the word -- Toytoy 00:55, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for this interesting article

I ran across this interesting article when I was looking up something else. I was attracted by the claim that sushi originated from China, which I heard for the first time. The only other origin place for sushi that I heard before is Korea.

Firstly, I need to disclose that I am a Chinese. I am having hard time in linking "鮨" with sushi. Could the author clarify his rationale that "鮨" was the early version of sushi? Similarity is not good enough. For example, we can find things similar to hamburg exisiting long time ago in China, but it would be very difficult to argue that hamburg originated from China. To support the Chinese origin claim, evidence of showing that the Japanese actually imported "鮨" and gradually improvised it is needed. There have been all kinds of exchange among Chinese, Koreans and Japanese for thousands of years. The mutual influence is abundant. It would not be surprising to find similarities among things from these countries. Invention never starts from complete scratch.

I look forward to learning more history of sushi, but I couldn’t care for less which people actually invented it.

--Hong 01:00, 2005 Apr 4 (UTC) MA, USA

The edomai sushi (江戶前寿司; Tokyo-styled sushi; fish on top of rice) is generally recognized as invented by Hanaya Yohei (華屋与兵衛; 1799 - 1858) at the end of Edo period (http://homepage3.nifty.com/maryy/eng/yohei.htm). The umbrella term sushi has been used to describe multiple kinds of food over ages. Many foods in Japan are still called whatever-sushi today. However, there's usually only one kind of sushi outside Japan.

The sound sushi can be written in Japanese in at least four ways:

• 寿司: Kanji; totally unrelated with Chinese language; used in Chinese speaking world "壽司" (traditional Chinese) or "寿司" (simplified Chinese)
• 鮨: Kanji; Chinese-related; not used by Chinese speakers
• 鮓: Kanji; Chinese-related; not used by Chinese speakers
• すし: hiragana; Japanese phonetic syllabary

The two Chinese words were borrowed as written forms of sushi (the sound) regardless of their original meanings. You can borrow the English word "Wikipedia" as the written form of sushi of Japanese. When you see the word "Wikipedia" in a Japanese text, you read sushi. Its China connection is actually very remote. -- Toytoy 01:37, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)

I found this article (http://homepage3.nifty.com/maryy/eng/sushi_kanji.htm) pretty useful. -- Toytoy 01:41, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)

More ideas

More can be written on this subject:

• Technological improvements: Tokyo is a harbour city. It is easy to obtain fresh raw fish in Tokyo. However, without refrigeration, fish such as lean tuna meat had to be preserved in soy sauce 100 years ago.
• Mostly preferred part of tuna: Lean "red meat" (赤身; akami) -> fatty belly meat (toro) after the WW II.
• Whale meat: An acquired flavor for the post-WW II generation. It becomes a hotly debated subject today.
• Serving: Two on a plate rather than one. The definition of the unit "貫" (かん; kan). Whether one kan means one or two sushi.
• Red vinegar -> white vinegar (after 1960s): In fear of imported stale south Asian rice (yellowish in color).
• The abolishment of street-side sushi food stands. (Possibly around the WW II; food safty issues). The rise of sushi restaurants (料亭).
• The invention of conveyor belt sushi. The downfall of "traditional" sushi restaurants.
• The "Californian" sushi.
• Sushi professionals' dialects (e.g. アガリ agari for tea; シャリ shari for rice ...) It is possibly somewhat impolite for an outsider to use these terms.
• Different stage-specific names (from birth to mature) of some fishes (http://home.k06.itscom.net/aki/shuse.htm).

This is an interesting subject. -- Toytoy 02:05, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)