Jump to content

Talk:Isotopes of europium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2a04:cec0:c027:cab3:fdca:a821:45d0:96b4 (talk) at 14:28, 20 November 2023 (Possible alpha decay of 149Eu and 150Eu). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconElements: Isotopes List‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this article, or visit the project page for more details.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Isotope Taskforce.

Low Half-life values of OO63Eu144 and OO63Eu140

The reported half-lives do not agree with the half-life trend line of the rest of the 63Eu Europium OO type isotopes.WFPM (talk) 23:42, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How would 153
Eu
decay to a much less stable isotope, 149
Pm
?

Because 149
Pm
is way too unstable, so shouldn't 153
Eu
be stable too? 80.98.179.160 (talk) 07:06, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is pretty normal: the obvious example is that 238U (half-life 4.468 × 109 years) decays to 234Th (half-life 24.1 days). The important thing is that the system of 149Pm plus an alpha particle is a lower-energy arrangement of 63 protons and 90 neutrons than a single 153Eu nucleus (just look at the binding energies), and so the decay is energetically allowed. Of course, it is kinetically hindered for other reasons. The beta-instability of 149Pm has nothing to do with it. Double sharp (talk) 07:15, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because 153Eu have a larger mass than a combination of 149Pm and 4He (atomic mass of 153Eu is 152.9212303, atomic mass of 149Pm is 148.918334, atomis of 4He is 4.002602) but the kenetic energy of alpha particle in this case is quite small meaning the half-life is quite largeCristiano Toàn (talk) 08:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At the order of 10140 year as stated in [1]. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 06:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could 150Eu possibly undergo β- decay to 150Gd?

This is energetically allowed, and also we observe a 89% probability of the β- decay of 150mEu. However, just like to case of 98Tc whose decay to 98Mo is unknown, do we know that it is impossible, or it's just we haven't observed that mode of decay? 129.104.241.214 (talk) 00:26, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

β- decay probability of 150mEu

This article [2] reports a 94.7% probability (instead of 89%) for the β- decay of 150mEu. Note that that article uses 150Eu to mean 150mEu throughout (see Abstract). 129.104.241.214 (talk) 15:54, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Possible alpha decay of 144,145,146,149,150Eu

According to [3], 146Eu, 149Eu and 150Eu should have respectively a partial alpha decay half-life at the order of 1023 years, 1013 years and 1015 years.

As for 144Eu and 145Eu, they have respectively an alpha decay energy of 0.16 MeV and 0.10 MeV, which are much too low, so their partial alpha decay half-lives should be long beyond imagination. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 06:14, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]