Jump to content

User talk:63.155.31.38

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Haoreima (talk | contribs) at 19:50, 28 November 2023 (Silk Road (marketplace)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

October 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Pickersgill-Cunliffe. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to A Gnome Named Gnorm have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:08, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok. Thank you. Wasn't sure if that would stick, I thought it might find itself welcomed given the context. 63.155.31.38 (talk) 01:23, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Silk Road (marketplace)

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Silk Road (marketplace), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Haoreima (talk) 09:45, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I respect your decision, but I would suggest that my edit was in fact constructive. "The prosecution" speaks more accurately to the point than the vague "the government."
The other sentence in my opinion contained relatively poor writing, and in my opinion my edit improved readability. 63.155.31.38 (talk) 10:06, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I understand your concerns too. I believe that it will be more constructive to have a community consensus regarding the matter in the article's talk page Thanks! :-)