Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Taiwan 1000

Attributing translations

Hi! At AfC, a reviewer had asked if some drafts that were submitted by one of your participating members were copyright violations. Being familiar with Chinese language, I managed to find that the drafts in questions were translations from zhwiki. I subsequently processed these drafts into the mainspace. However, as these drafts weren't tagged with this project's tracking category or banner, it wasn't immediately apparent that this project is connected in some manner. This was until I recently found more drafts with your project category.

I have yet to these drafts, however, as a start if these drafts are translated from the corresponding articles in zhwiki, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example: Content in this edit is translated from the existing Chinese Wikipedia article at [[:zh:Exact name of Chinese article]]; see its history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk pages of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, please add attribution retrospectively for that also, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

您好！在WP:WPAFC,有位审核员怀疑一些与这专题参与者有关的草稿（Draft:LÜ Bing-Chuan）有侵犯了版权的可能行。由于对参考来源的语言不了解，他便问了其他审核员。因为我了解中文语言，所以还是能在zhwiki找到了原文。我最终批注了这些草稿，也在页面历史里，讨论页里放了原文来源的编辑，模板。由于这草稿没有显示这专题有关的信息，当时也没注意到这专题。直到今天在别的草稿看到了这专题的分类。

我还没开始评估这些草稿。但如果这些草稿是从zhwiki上的原文所翻译的，为了避免类似的版权问题或怀疑，请您在这些草稿上放些原文来源的信息。您可以单独列出该编辑，在编辑摘要中声明Content in this edit is translated from the existing Chinese Wikipedia article at [[:zh:Exact name of Chinese article]]; see its history for attribution.。您也可以在草稿的讨论页上使用{{Translated page}}模板放相当的信息。

谢谢 – robertsky (talk) 20:48, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 17:21, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:WikiProject Taiwan 1000 Draft

Hi there! I started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation#WikiProject Taiwan 1000 Drafts about the Category:WikiProject Taiwan 1000 Draft, and would appreciate input from members of this WikiProject. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 15:38, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]