Talk:Demonic Males
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Demonic Males article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Books Unassessed | |||||||
|
Evolutionary biology Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 January 2021 and 19 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Anthro Lover. Peer reviewers: Leilakinson, Jessemerodio, Venturca.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
The titre...
It sounds so... Mysandric. Is the book biased? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.176.80.65 (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- The book is in no way misandric (not mysandric) and not biased at all. It is, in fact, the first book on human aggression which is free of ideology and sticks to empirical facts. It illustrates the role male aggression plays in our history and society, but does not fail to mention increasing female violence, especially among teenagers. In an - unfortunately - short passage the role of women in the evolution of male aggressivity is mentioned: the sexual selection by women of aggressive mating partners has produced the dominant expansive male who has shaped human history from Alexander the Great via Caesar, Genghis Khan, Napoleon, to Mussolini, Stalin, Hitler and Mao. Regrettably this book has not been met with the attention it deserves. Ontologix (talk) 04:43, 4 March 2013 (UTC)