Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClearTrial (2nd nomination)

ClearTrial

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. articles about what staff members have done independently are not coverage about this business. Like the last spam that was deleted the same year this was recreated by a new SPA this is just spam. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: borderline G11. Owen× ☎ 14:48, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:37, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect: An article about a company, recreated by a WP:SPA 4 months after the previous AfD deletion decision. The several 2011 postings - probably primary - seem insufficient to demonstrate that notability was attained. The firm's 2012 takeover is mentioned at List of acquisitions by Oracle so a redirect could be an WP:ATD. AllyD (talk) 20:05, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I'm okay with a Redirect per AllyD, ideally accompanied with a page protect set to extended-confirmed. I doubt this SPA will give up. Owen× ☎ 22:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]