Jump to content

Digital scholarship

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GVogeler (talk | contribs) at 20:08, 22 December 2023 (→History). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

A digital learning environment

Digital scholarship is the use of digital evidence, methods of inquiry, research, publication and preservation to achieve scholarly and research goals.[1] Digital scholarship can encompass both scholarly communication using digital media and research on digital media. An important aspect of digital scholarship is the effort to establish digital media and social media as credible, professional and legitimate means of research and communication.[2] Digital scholarship has a close association with digital humanities, often serving as the umbrella term for discipline-agnostic digital research methods.

Digital scholarship may also include born-digital means of scholarly communication that are more traditional, like online journals and databases, e-mail correspondence and the digital or digitized collections of research and academic libraries. Since digital scholarship is often concerned with the production and distribution of digital media, discussions about copyright, fair use and digital rights management (DRM) frequently accompany academic analysis of the topic. Combined with open access, digital scholarship is offered as a more affordable and open model for scholarly communication.[3]

History

The concept of digital scholarship (DS) emerged early in the 21st century ([4][5]). DS is described as “discipline-based scholarship produced with digital tools and presented in digital form” ([6]). It is also considered as a research agenda concerned with the impact of Internet and digital technologies that are transforming scholarly practices. These include social and technological factors ([7]). In the 2010's research has taken mainly two approaches to the subject: The impact of digital infrastructures, in particular the internet, on scholarship, where Christine L. Borgman is reference researcher[8] and the role of the academic library has been discussed in particular[9], and the impact of digital scholarship on the institutions and organization of academia.[10][11][12][13] [14]

Outlook

According to Ernest L. Boyer in Scholarship Reconsidered, discovery, integration, application, and teaching are the four main aspects of scholarship.[15][16] The growth of digital media means that the main areas of scholarship can each benefit from expansions in their own way thanks to the infinite sharability of digital content.[17]

In education, the main areas of relevance are science, technology, engineering and math. It is said that students learn best in a classroom when they are actively engaged. The emergence of digital scholarship and digital media allows for another means for students to become engaged. Key areas of academia that digital media is used on are to illustrate concepts, model displays and reinforce 21st century skills.[18]

Critics cite concerns about the legitimacy[citation needed], accessibility and verifiability[citation needed] of digital scholarship and the erosion of authors' rights as reasons to be concerned about digital scholarship. As scholarly communication evolves, controversy over the definition and value of the term "digital scholarship" is likely to continue.

Digital scholarship must take all of cultural, economic, personal, and institutional responsibilities to take its position as academic scholarship and to realize the core purpose of higher education with the possibilities of our time.[19][clarification needed]

Intellectual property

Concerns with how to regulate digital scholarship have arisen across universities across the world. The explosion in availability and creation of scholarly works has led many universities to adjust their policies on how they will manage scholarship in the future. These universities feel pressured to take action because digital technologies have led to the easy reproduction and commodification of these creations.[20] Many universities are unclear how to address the copyrighting of online classes and media presentations. Current law does not cover these specific areas of media produced in the academic world.[21] In the past any printed work done by professors was considered their intellectual property, but now the question stands as to who owns these different forms of multimedia. One of the main concerns of faculty is that universities will soon take ownership of this digital media.

Universities have taken a growing interest in creations that have revenue-generating potential, like online classes or lecture slides, while also showing concern for products that may be used by comparable institutions, potentially reducing their competitive advantage.[21] In order to stay on top of others academically, universities have sought to keep the intellectual property created within the university away from others schools. Not only are universities using digital scholarship to make money and stay ahead, but they also have interests in protecting their brand.[21]

While universities attempt to protect digital scholarship, it is in many professors best interests for their creations to be seen by the world as to grow their brand and acclaim as a professor. Laws that may apply to digital scholarship are largely outdated but professors would like to use the argument of faculty ownership of traditional works as historical practice and practice compatible with mission of higher education as a public good.[21] Professors argue that it took time and serious effort to make the presentations, slides, media.[21] To date professors have been rarely questioned whether they have the right to bring their course outlines, lecture outlines, and lecture notes with them if they decide to leave the university where they created them.[21] Change over the ability of professors to bring digital scholarship with them is expected as universities have begun to take notice and assert copyrights.[21] Professors will argue that since they are the creators and authors of the product they are the owners according to law.

As of now most copyright laws in America indicate that the author or creator holds the copyright, but the same cannot be said for digital scholarship. The law explicitly states that if the work is within the scope of his or her employment then the work is the property of the employer.[21] Since the employer here would be the university, professors are technically creating work for hire. While faculty of universities appear to not be credited for their work, the primary reason for a university to take ownership of a faculty's work is that the member created the work using university funds mostly.[21] Solutions to the lack of clear laws regarding ownership of digital scholarship are not currently being created but many universities have created written contracts with professors over who owns future work or what they can do with previous work.

For example, in the U.S. Supreme Court case Stanford v. Roche, the court decided that Roche, a former Stanford researcher, was a co-owner with Stanford of patents for testing kits to detect HIV.[22] While this case does not deal with digital scholarship directly, it deals with the ownership of intellectual property of university employees when they leave. This case will set a precedent for future decisions with online classes, lecture notes, and outlines.

NEA Policy

The National Education Association (NEA), the largest professional educational association in the United States, updated its policy on digital learning in 2013. The policy stresses that students need to develop "advanced critical thinking and information literacy skills and master new digital tools", as well as "the initiative to become self-directed learners while adapting to the ever-changing digital information landscape". The NEA also believes that digital learning creates an environment in which learning can be more individualized to meet the needs of each student. The NEA mandates that all public schools must do their best to acquire necessary modern technologies and constantly revise teaching plans to incorporate technology where viable to best prepare students for the 21st century. The NEA's digital learning policy also states that technology must be used in an adaptive manner as to not become a distraction and to remain a tool, as well as that technology should not become a replacement for instructors, merely a supplement.[23]

Literature

Borgman, Christine L. Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, Mass. London: MIT Press, 2010.


References

  1. ^ Rumsey, Abby (July 2011). "New-Model Scholarly Communication: Road Map for Change" (PDF). Scholarly Communication Institute 9. University of Virginia Library. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-04-04. Retrieved 29 March 2019.
  2. ^ "The Challenges of Digital Scholarship". The Chronicle of Higher Education. 25 January 2012. Retrieved 30 July 2013.
  3. ^ Hornby, Amanda; Leslie Bussert. "Digital scholarship and scholarly communication" (PDF). University of Washington Libraries. Retrieved 30 July 2013.
  4. ^ Andersen, D.L.; Trinkle, D. (2004). "Valuing digital scholarship in the tenure, promotion, and review process – a survey of academic historians". Digital Scholarship in the Tenure, Promotion and Review Process, ed. by D. Andersen, M.E. Sharpe. London: 61–77.
  5. ^ Ayers, Edward (2004). "Doing scholarship on the web: ten years of triumphs – and a disappointment". Journal of Scholarly Publishing. 35 (3): 143–147. doi:10.3138/jsp.35.3.143.
  6. ^ Ayers, Ed (2013). "Does Digital Scholarship Have a Future?". Educause.
  7. ^ Weller, Martin (2011). The Digital Scholar: How Technology is Transforming Scholarly Practice. A&C Black.
  8. ^ Christine L. Borgman. Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, Mass. London: MIT Press, 2010.
  9. ^ McKenzie, Alison, und Lindsey Martin, Hrsg. Developing Digital Scholarship: Emerging Practices in Academic Libraries. London: Facet Publishing, 2016.
  10. ^ Andersen, Deborah Lines. Digital Scholarship in the Tenure, Promotion and Review Process. New York: Routledge, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315705170.
  11. ^ Costa, Cristina, und Mark Murphy. „Digital Scholarship: Recognizing New Practices in Academia“. In Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, herausgegeben von Michael Peters, 1–6. Singapore: Springer, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_259-1.
  12. ^ Hamey, Yvonne. „Developing Digital Scholarship: Emerging Practices in Academic Libraries“. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association 67, Nr. 1 (2. Januar 2018): 66–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2018.1429798.
  13. ^ Murphy, Mark, und Cristina Costa. „Digital scholarship, higher education and the future of the public intellectual“. Futures 111 (1. August 2019): 205–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.04.011.
  14. ^ Scanlon, Eileen. „Digital Scholarship: Identity, Interdisciplinarity, and Openness“. Frontiers in Digital Humanities 5 (2018). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fdigh.2018.00003.
  15. ^ Boyer, Ernest L.; Moser, Drew; Ream, Todd C.; Braxton, John M. (2016) [1990]. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate (Expanded ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN 9781118988305. OCLC 920469646.
  16. ^ Pearce, Nick; Scanlon, Eileen; Weller, Martin; Ashleigh, Melanie. "Digital Scholarship Considered". In Education, p. 35. [1] Archived 2014-03-12 at the Wayback Machine
  17. ^ Feeney, Mary & Ross, Seamus (1994). "Information Technology in Humanities Scholarship, British Achievements, Prospects, and Barriers". Historical Social Research. 19 (1 (69)): 3–59. JSTOR 20755828.
  18. ^ Teachers' domain: digital media (including video!) resources for the STEM classroom and collection. 2010. Knowledgeable Quest, 39 (2).
  19. ^ Ayers, Edward L. "Does Digital Scholarship Have a Future?" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 March 2014. Retrieved 5 August 2013.
  20. ^ Ross, Sheri (2012). "Intellectual Property Policies in Academe: Issues and Concerns with Digital Scholarship". Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
  21. ^ a b c d e f g h i Ross, Sheri V.T. (2012). "Intellectual Property Policies in Academe: Issues and Concerns with Digital Scholarship". Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
  22. ^ Lapin, Lisa (7 June 2011). "Stanford 'disappointed' in Supreme Court ruling in Roche case". Stanford News. Retrieved 20 March 2014.
  23. ^ "NEA Policy Statement on Digital Learning". National Education Association. Retrieved 2014-03-18.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Digital_scholarship&oldid=1191315458"