Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Feminism
| Main page | Talk page | Members | Resources | Popular pages |
|---|
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Feminism and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 2 months  |
 | Feminism Project‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | WikiProject Feminism was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 7 March 2011. |
Requesting Copyedit Help at Alliance Against Sexual Coercion
Hi, I found this article via the Random Article link. I've been trying to improve it and I looked into the history and it looks like it was started as a part of a class wikipedia article creation project. It needs more copyediting and work but I am not sure I am able to do everything it needs. Thank you for any help you can give? I hope what I have done so far is useful. Saikyoryu (talk) 01:09, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- I copy edited as much as I could but I don’t have the expertise yet to do much else. Had a hard time finding other sources as well, and there’s definitely still some tonality problems. Hope I was able to help :) Dolphianity (talk) 15:58, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Proposal to split MOS:GENDERID from Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography
Comments invited.
Bluerasberry (talk) 19:11, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Requesting inputs at AFD - Islamic Bill of Rights for Women in the Mosque
Requesting inputs at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic Bill of Rights for Women in the Mosque (2nd nomination) discussion. - Bookku (talk) 05:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Wife-selling needs a review..
Hello all, I recently stumbled upon the article wife selling, and it definitely needs a rewrite:
- Intro is too long, too general, and lacks references.
- While this may have been practiced /is perhaps still practiced, it wouls likely be good to differentiate a little. In most parts of the world, it is no longer possible to "sell a wife", to get a divorce, cover for debt, etc
- The part on the Roman pater familias is inaccurate at best, and likely wrong.
In short, the article needs looking at. Likely a rewrite/correction of most of the article. Eptalon (talk) 20:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
article Human nature needs improvement per MOS:GNL and WP:GENDER
I was surprised to see that the article Human nature needs improvement per MOS:GNL and WP:GENDER -
article has many instances of "man" being used to mean "human being", "mankind" being used to mean "humanity", etc.
Please help improve this article per MOS:GNL and WP:GENDER. Thanks.
- 189.60.49.251 (talk) 06:21, 16 September 2023 (UTC)