User talk:Gorbeh

Welcome!

Hello, Gorbeh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Khoikhoi 18:43, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Yeah, thanks for helping me out on those two pages. I've a had some disputes with those users in the past. I didn't know that "Fars" was an Arabized word, that's very interesting. I mean, why should we have the page be moved to "Fars people" if it's an Arab word? It just doesn't make any sense.

I'm trying to stay neutral, as there are so many distortions due to nationalism it's ridiculous. Keep in mind that we shouldn't have everything be towards the Persian POV as well. ;) Thanks again! --Khoikhoi 18:39, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am a proud Persian. But the big majority of Persians are not blind nationalists. I myself was a wikipedian at the beginning of 2005 and I started many pages and biographies about persians. In most cases I have just refered to them as Iranian and very rarely I mentioned their ethnicity. However I am quite sure that you can not find even one page about one Iranian kurd in wikipedia where his ethnicity was not mentioned. I am a persian and I love our culture but I rarely use the word persian just to make Iranian kurds and arabs happy. Persians consider Kurds as Iranian, historically, culturally and officially. But as you may have noticed some Iranian Kurds are reluctant to consider themselves as Iranian. They hate Iran and Persians. There is also one point that may be interesting for you. There is no problem between Kurds and Persians in Iran. The problem is between Shia people (persian and azeri and kurds) and Sunni kurds. The problem is mainly Shia-Sunni problem. Shia Kurds live in Kermanshah province of Iran and Sunni Kurds live in Kurdistan province and West Azerbaijan province. Up to now there were no protest or demonstration ... in Kermanshah. and all protest and oppressions by central regime happens in regions where Sunni Kurds live. Our Oil minister and government spokeman etc were Shia Kurds during last 8 years. But Sunni Kurds do not consider Shia Kurds as proper Kurds! In summary there is no problem between Kurds and Persians and we are culturally very close. Our regime is neither Persian nor Kurdish prone. It is only Shia prone. The government tried a lot to destroy persian names and also delete persian culture from books and public sphere. These information might be interesting for you. It is a long time that Persians are putting blind nationalism aside. But Kurds see our regime as a persian regime ! You may find it interesting that Iran's leader is Azeri, previous president was arab and her wife is also arab (daughter of Musa Sadr from lebonan). The heads of military forces are arabs and azeri. Our Previous parliament speaker was Lur and the head of Judiciary system is also arab! Why Kurds call this regime a persian regime ???? Just because every body speak Persian language ! Yes because this is the only language through which all iranians can communicate in practice (just like English in today's world). It is interesting the during thousand years many ethnic groups occupied Iran but they adopted Persian as their official language. Finally I would like to mention that no Persian will try to destroy Kurdish culture as they (persians) consider it an integral part of Iranian culture. Any ways ! that's a long story. Thanks for your helps and wish you best. Take care. -- Gorbeh 09:18, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Iranian continent

I think the decision was reached already to change name to Greater Iran --Kash 12:30, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Persian people

The user Aucaman has been vandalizing Persian people, as well as several other Iran-related articles, claiming that "modern Persians are mix of Arabs and Mongols" editing the article, or adding a dispute tag, based on his own personal assumptions and conclusions without any valid source to support such outrageous revisionist theory. If you have an opinion on this topic, please join the Talk:Persian_people, so we can reach a consensus for the removal of the "dispute tag".

Iranian Watchdog'

Aucaman and a few others like Heja Helweda and Diyako have been repeatedly and systematically vandalizing the Iran-related topics such as Persian people and Iranian peoples, propagating false information, maliciously editing/disputing/deleting without one shred of proof to backup their wild claims, applying the strawman falsification approach, trying to establish new 'facts" based on their own personal assumptions and beliefs.

In order to prevent this situation, we need to create an Iranian Watchdog on Wikipedia and guard the integrity and quality of all the Wikipedia articles that are related to Iran and Iranians. Please let me know if you think that's a good idea. --ManiF 13:01, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gorbeh, I received your message on my talk page. Thank you for the warning. I think the creation of an Iranian Watchdog is essential for defending the integrity of Iran-related articles. Please include me in any watchdog plans. Houshyar 14:31, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for cabal mediation - Persians

Please voice your opinions and present facts and sources in the comment section here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-03-02_Persian_people

Iranian Wikipedians' Notice Board (WatchDog)

Please bookmark this page, for daily updates on the status of the Iran-related articles. Read notices posted by others or add your own notice by updating "Urgent view". --ManiF 16:34, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Please know it is extremely important that you go to the following page and sign your comments; of course, do so only if you agree that the user in question is abuses his editing privileges. It is very important that you please go to the following page and help me combat anti-Iranianism made by one particular user who is doing possible sneaky vandalism, yet certainly disruptiveness on most Persian related articles due to political and Zionist reasons, which have no place in an encyclopedia.The link that suports banning this user who is namely user Aucaman is here[1], and also Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-03-02 Persian people. Also, it is very important that you do not respond to any of the comments in that page, since we have chosen user Zmmz to be the spokes person who is representing us, give all your comments to him here[2], and he will submit it for you. It is important that we have one voice there.

It is extremely crucial that we as a cohesive group of editors, keep an eyes on the following articles, so that users like Aucaman, D, User:Heja helweda, and User:Zora who constantly inserts comments into the following articles like, Iranian are Arabs, Al Khwarizmi was an Arab, Rumi was not Persian, and Iran meaning, Land of Aryans actually comes from Nazi, Germany. So, please be active, and whenever possible check on the following articles;

Also, please go to this page [3], and vote for limiting the editing privileges of these users who vandalize all articles relating to Iran and Persia.

1. Iranian people article. We also need a lot of help on the Persian people, Iranian people, Persian Empire, and the Al Khwarizmi, Al Biruni

2. Persian people

3. Persian Empire

4. Al Khwarizmi

5. Al Biruni

6. Rumi

7. Angel

8. Parsi

9. Knight

10. Khuzestan

11. Safavids

12. Richard Nelson Frye, who is the Guardian of Persian history.

Finally, Please bookmark this page[4], for daily updates on the status of the Iran-related articles. Read notices posted by others or add your own notice by updating "Urgent view".

Please remember not write too much texts; rather, be short, to the point, civil, polite towards others, and above all factual. ThanksZmmz 05:03, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Diyako is trying to make an alternative ficticious definition of Newroz

User:Diyako has created an article on a Turkic-Nowruz without mention of its Iranian history and roots. Soon we will here Nowruz has nothing to do with Iran too. His article is Nevruz. This should be merged or edited properly. He has gone on the Turkish discussions to promote it.

Here is what user:Diyako has written;

Nevruz is the spring festival among Turkic-speaking nations, from Turkey to Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan etc. It is very similar to the Iranian festival of Norouz.

According to Turkish legends Nevruz dates back to era of Gökturks.

Th user Diyako is definnityl anti-Iranian and has an anti-Iranian agenda.

Nevruz is not very similar to the Irnian festival of Norouz it is Norouz!

He has claimed the Kurdish flag has nothing to do with Iran and is a crime to fly in Iran. The Kurdish flag is based on the Iranian flag it is even in the memories of the founders of the Mehbad Republic who wanted to showcase their Aryan and Mede heritage. Back then Kurds only had a oral history about their only know ancestors the Mede and Mede heritage, before other ancestors were accepted. The Sun is also very significant element of ancient Iranian and Zorasatrianism. Diyako is misleading everyone. Go to Kurdistan 20 years ago let alone 50 they will say we are Aryans and our own blood relatives are the Persians. The Kurdish flag is not banned in Iran and is based on Iranian colours. This user also claims the Iranians are only a lingustic group after he saw that the tide was against him that Kurds are in definition an Iranian people so he worked to undermine the definition of Iranian people and even Persians with user:Acuman.

69.196.139.250 21:29, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user is aditionally using the owrd Farsi in a provactive and degrading way nd has states that the "Farsi Editors" have no credibility and so on. He has full knowledge tht some find this term provacative, but uses it to insitage anger. See his discussion page.

69.196.139.250 23:24, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mosharekat.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mosharekat.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:07, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Dictators

You commented in the last Article for deletion discussion. This article is up for deletion again.

You are welcome to comment about the discussion for deletion. Ikip (talk) 09:22, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Javadtaba.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Javadtaba.jpg, which you've attributed to javad tabatabei. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]