Wikipedia:Simple Flying

There have been a number of discussions on Wikipedia regarding Simple Flying. While there is not yet agreement to depreciate it, there have been three discussions on the matter at the reliable sources noticeboard and there is a clear consensus that it is not a reliable source. It is also marked unreliable in the Unreliable/Predatory Source Detector (UPSD) script.

Simple Flying is widely viewed as a content farm which regularly publishes inaccurate and plagiarized articles. However, there are a number of articles on Wikipedia which link to this website.

There are many examples of Simple Flying's inaccuracies and failure to meet the WP:NEWSORG and WP:RS standards of having a "reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" and being "well established". Some of them are listed below.

Gary Leff posts: "That's just usual Simple Flying stuff, it's either ripped off or wrong, so it doesn't surprise me when both happen in the same piece."
Bloomberg's aviation reporter posts: "I really wish Simple Flying would stop ripping off our stories and suffice it with a simple "credit" right at the bottom of the story. It just doesn't cut it."
Ishirion documents some of their inaccuracies
Enilria on Patron documents another article with inaccuracies (not corrected)
Their "lead journalist" for Africa, contributing since 2018, graduated from high school in 2020. Hardly a professional news operation.
A video about SAS that refers to Singapore Airlines throughout
Articles where they discuss the A321XLR as operating (before it started commercial flying)
An article and video on the 747 where the video and the article contradict each other with the added bonus that it doesn't appear copyedited.
They're owned by a company with a business model of churnalism for ad and affiliate revenue. We wouldn't consider their other blogs to be reliable sources, why should Simple Flying be any different?