Talk:Class (knowledge representation)

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cognitive science (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Libraries Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Relationship between other class articles

I would try to conceptualise the `class` Wikipedia articles as : Class (knowledge representation) uses Class (set theory); and Class (computer science) implements Class (knowledge representation). Does that seem reasonable? John Vandenberg ^(chat) 23:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Proposal

Could we merge Class (philosophy) with this article? They describe the same things and the other article barely has references. @TomT0m @Fgnievinski @Bruceanthro @Phrygas Lectrician1 (talk) 19:35, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Class (philosophy) contains important flaws - it does not adequately distinguish class, type, set, kind. I'll offer an edit. Phrygas (talk) 18:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]