This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot(talk | contribs) at 21:34, 13 January 2024(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Plants}}, {{WikiProject Alabama}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 21:34, 13 January 2024 by Cewbot(talk | contribs)(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Plants}}, {{WikiProject Alabama}}.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles
A fact from Acer floridanum appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 May 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the precise status of the Florida Maple (Acer barbatum) as an independent species, or a subspecies of Sugar Maple (A. saccharum) is not clear?
I've found a lot of interesting taxonomic information about this species. It's obviously not much right now, but I'm following the format of some of the better articles within the scope of the plant project and hopefully it can be greatly improved. A picture would be great. I'm not living in the range right now, so if someone could put one up that would be helpful. Djlayton423:28, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This should be moved back to Acer barbatum. One source cites it as A. floridanum, every other source still accepts it as A. barbatum. We can't make judgements as to what we think it should be, but rather we should go with concensus. It's listed as A. barbatum in every database I have looked at. Djlayton4 | talk | contribs21:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
